Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

...and whoever's playing the Yankees - 2008 Game Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
He blew the save and scummed a win out of it. 0-2 in save opportunities, lucky to come out 1-1. More often than not, when your closer gets a decision, it means he failed at his job.

 

FAIL

 

Mo hasn't blown a save yet this year ;)

Posted
Mo hasn't blown a save yet this year ;)

 

He flat out didn't get the job done, but that's OK because he has you and Jacko to sugar coat his suck.

Posted
He flat out didn't get the job done' date=' but that's OK because he has you and Jacko to sugar coat his suck.[/quote']

 

...and here comes the name calling. Look, there are plenty of legitimate reasons to bang on the Yanks. There's no need to fudge stats and attack the one guy who's been doing his job.

Posted
...and here comes the name calling. Look' date=' there are plenty of legitimate reasons to bang on the Yanks. There's no need to fudge stats and attack the one guy who's been doing his job.[/quote']

 

Fudge what stats? He came in twice in a matter of days in the 9th with the game on the line and gave up dongs. So if he's signed a new contract as a whiplash test dummy, yes, in fact, he's doing his job.

Posted
Fudge what stats? He came in twice in a matter of days in the 9th with the game on the line and gave up dongs.

 

Or, more specifically, twice in three consecutive games he yielded a home run in his single inning pitched that gave the hapless Royals the lead in the ninth inning.

Posted
Still no victory for Joba as a starter. He only gave up one run in 6 innings but he walked 4, gave up 6 hits and struck out only 2. I'm not blown away.
Posted
3 of the walks were in one inning, 1 intentional. Not one ball was hit hard. I was more impressed with Joba's sinker today. He was pitching to contact early on and it left him in for 6 innings rather than having him out after 5. Word is Wang and Joba are working on the 2 seamer. It didnt have Wang's bite, but he was throwing it 93mph
Posted
Moose is going for his 10th win. He has been much better than I had expected. I didn't think he had anything left.

 

Much better than I expected too....dammit....

Posted
Mussina after 6 innings is a problem. Ohlendorf at any inning is a problem. Quite a conundrum. I think Ohlie needs a dose of the minors. He got ruined by Girardi in April and May. He needs a confidence builder.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
When are you going to accept that Dorf on Baseball just might not be that good? Blaming the manager now because he sucks? Ridiculous. Blame the manager for using him in regards to winning / losing a ballgame. Don't blame the manager for him being, you know, not good and all.
Posted
Predictable. Girardi abused the kid early on. 20 innings in April. That is a 120IP pace for a kid who just converted to relief mid season last yr. He also was being used as our long man and setup man for some reason when we wanted to rest Joba. Regardless, he is a kid with a hard fastball and a plus slider. He was abused early on and it showed. Now I think his confidence is broken. Just like hansen, the stuff is too good to write him off as nothing. I'd ship him to Scranton for the forseeable future and see what Robertson can do. Funny thing is, while Ohlendorf was being abused, Veras and Ramirez were busy carving a nice niche out of our pen.
Posted
Ohlendorf at any inning is a problem. Quite a conundrum. I think Ohlie needs a dose of the minors. He got ruined by Girardi in April and May. He needs a confidence builder.

 

Predictable. Girardi abused the kid early on. 20 innings in April. That is a 120IP pace for a kid who just converted to relief mid season last yr. He also was being used as our long man and setup man for some reason when we wanted to rest Joba. Regardless, he is a kid with a hard fastball and a plus slider. He was abused early on and it showed. Now I think his confidence is broken. Just like hansen, the stuff is too good to write him off as nothing. I'd ship him to Scranton for the forseeable future and see what Robertson can do. Funny thing is, while Ohlendorf was being abused, Veras and Ramirez were busy carving a nice niche out of our pen.

 

Ross Ohlendorf, 2008 PECOTA Weighted Mean Projection: 5.95 ERA, 63 IP

Ross Ohlendorf, actual mid-season 2008 stats: 5.71 ERA, 34.7 IP

 

Ohlendorf has been used very slightly more than projected. His ERA is very slightly less than projected. Exactly how has he been ruined by Girardi?

 

See, from here it looks more as if Ohlendorf wasn't expected to be very good and he's roughly matched expectations. :dunno:

Posted
PECOTA is a putrid projection tool as are most tools projecting what a rookie pitcher will do. I'd look at stuff more than your tidy little cpu projections. The fact that he is new to relieving makes PECOTA obsolete in that sense since he doesnt have a track record to reliably follow.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Use your head, Jacko. What do most prospects do first when they hit the bigs? They get broken into the league in relief roles. Even the really good ones. There's 30 years of data where this transition has been made along the lines with what Dorf is going through. I can understand if you just have a hard time accepting PECOTA, but the reason you gave shows how little thought goes into your disagreement.
Posted
I understand that you can try to predict an adjustment period, but this one doesnt hold water. You have a guy who was just moved to the pen last july or so in the minors and now, you will have a pre-season ranking predicting how he will do in a full season at a higher level at the new role? Also, the idea of PECOTA and any other ranking system is based upon players prior performance and cannot accurately detail a player finally breaking out. As such, it cannot predict a player's performance at a new role when it doesnt have the data to make the prediction. It is a farse.
Posted
PECOTA is a putrid projection tool as are most tools projecting what a rookie pitcher will do. The fact that he is new to relieving makes PECOTA obsolete in that sense since he doesnt have a track record to reliably follow.

 

You clearly don't know what you're talking about.

 

Ohlendorf started fewer than half of his professional games in calendar year 2007, and he was originally projected to serve as a relief pitcher/spot starter by PECOTA based upon the actual use pattern of pitchers with similar records (and phenotypes) at the same age. BP then adjusted their projections based upon actual final depth charts (last updated in April), projecting 60 relief IP, zero games started, and the same 5.95 ERA.

 

PECOTA's MLE system was overhauled 2-3 years ago. It used to be their weakest area, but they're doing much better regarding minor league translations and projections in the past two seasons, IIRC. I know that PECOTA is ranked at or near the top of all systems each year.

 

***

 

But you criticize PECOTA as "putrid" and a "farse." Do you personally have a better record of projections? See, Jacko, when I thread-mine your past prognostications, your record appears worse than Nate Silver's PECOTA. If that's true, and PECOTA is "putrid," what adjective properly describes your projections? :dunno:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...