We don’t know what either team considered. It seems like Boston was paying him to be a player and not a leader, otherwise they could have played him at 2b, kept Devers at 3b, and avoided a lot of discord. But Breslow clearly valued certain baseball skills, and normally Bregman shows them.
I do think it’s difficult for Bregman to establish himself as a leader when he is still being booed as a cheater in many stadiums. There is a reason I NEVER bring up leadership aspects of a player - I have no idea what they are, or even if they exist outside of Alex Speier articles. To say it can’t be quantified is an understatement. And if it can’t even be quantified, how can it possibly be prioritized?
As for Refsnyder, he’s a role player making role player money. He got $6mill, roughly the same as Boston paid IKF. That’s actually becoming fairly common Experienced Bench Player money these days.
Is leadership just another made up reason to create a clueless false persona on Sox management? Seattle paid career minor leaguer/bench bat Rob Refsnyder, who has 15 more at bats than me and the same number of hits, $6mill, which is being justified by his leadership. Boston paid the same money to a light-hitting Gold Glover capable of playing 7 positions and been a starter in 3 different teams, but as no one has praised his leadership, he is left to be judged and disparaged for an offensive skillset he was never signed for…