Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

notin

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    53,472

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by notin

  1. notin
    Not the point. The point is going right back to the exact same method that failed the night before by giving up 3 earned runs in 0 IP against the bottom of the lineup and then trying it again against the top. No one is saying DFA Jansen. Just saying one night off when the team needs a win…
  2. notin
    I agree. As I said before, Schreiber has been watching for two days without getting the call…
  3. notin
    Or he was hoping Jansen would be ok after getting right back on the proverbial horse. The problem is, he flopped last night against the bottom of the lineup, and tonight he had the top…
  4. notin
    As good as Kutter has been, he does have options and he can be demoted due to the overcrowding…
  5. notin
    No. It was a one way street today…
  6. notin
    There’s no rule that you have to use your closer in the ninth inning, especially one day after he collapsed and gave up 3 runs without getting an out. Schreiber has watched Jansen give up 6 runs on one inning in this series and can’t get handed the ball despite being the best RP on the team one year ago…
  7. notin
    Didn’t Bloom get him Schreiber, too?
  8. notin
    But only the Sox opponents are watered down!
  9. notin
    Their closer collapses?
  10. notin
    That’s the thing with closers. It’s the “everybody needs to know their role” mentality that makes you do the same thing over and over and expect different results. Why not let Schreiber get a save? Oh wait, he isn’t a closer!!”
  11. notin
    So… Brasier closing?
  12. notin
    Of course, at some point the Sox might as well give Hamilton a look. If nothing else, he’s a defensive upgrade over Valdez…
  13. notin
    You could write that entire post and not change a word (except “Mets”) about CC Sabathia, and he was a mountain of a human being. Stature might have contributed to Pedro’s decline, but it’s hard to say. Pitchers are capable of just falling apart. I’ve said it before - nothing ruins a pitcher more than pitching…
  14. notin
    The same Rays who just picked up Zack Littell?
  15. notin
    Tommy LaSorda once said almost exact same thing about a young Dominican righty that the team went on to deal away for Delino DeShields…
  16. notin
    It would have made more sense to keep Littell…
  17. notin
    Certainty possible, but if his fear was the long term health of the game, he certainly knew any contract was a risk anyway. I mean, if MLB folded, what good is a guaranteed deal from them?
  18. notin
    The Sox pitchers with options are Bernardino, Bello, Schreiber and Winckowski. I do hope they DFA Brasier before demoting the last 3. But it’s not a guarantee…
  19. notin
    The Sox offered Mookie the same AAV but for 2 fewer seasons. At the time, that wasn’t enough. It’s certainly possible COVID played a factor (although not sure how), but his demands from Boston were $400mill over X years. Did he come down from that with LA? Or just accept their offer? But it’s looking like Boston still did OK in that deal as compared to other superstar trades. (Who will truncate that sentence and then blast me for it?) What did Baltimore get for Manny Machado? Or Pitt for Gerrit Cole? Or Oakland for Chapman and Olson? And none of them were making $25mill, let alone paired up with an additional salary dump…
  20. notin
    Betts’ $25mill salary was part of the trade package. And probably a big part of the reason only two teams made offers for the relative bargain…
  21. notin
    The “why” Mookie was dealt current make Verdugo an afterthought in the deal. He was the one player in both iterations of the trade. LA was able to include him likely because Mookie was taking his position. I didn’t “equate” him with Mookie in the same way I don’t “equate” Cameron Maybin with Miguel Cabrera. But the deal was about getting back as much as possible while offloading Mookie (and his $25mill salary) and as much of Price as possible. Also, are you really counting the 52 games Verdugo played in 2017 and 2018 combined at 2 full seasons?
  22. notin
    None of which makes Verdugo a PTBNL. Nearly every (or, if you prefer, every) deal of a superstar for prospects or young talent has netted next to nothing as a return. Verdugo is looking like the rare exception and can join the small list of worthwhile players acquired for a star player, alongside Randy Johnson, Grady Sizemore, Cliff Lee, and Brandon Phillips…
  23. notin
    By the end of the year, the best teams will win around 60% of the games (give or take a few percent) and the worst teams will win around 40%(ish) of their games. Just like every year…
  24. notin
    Has he moved on from Purple Haze? I will give Dalbec credit for having the best walk up songs in MLB…
  25. notin
    It’s not even parity. The same teams are hoarding expensive talent. Calling the league “watered down” is ridiculous. The talent level in the league now is probably at its highest ever and climbing, thanks to a complete shift into full time baseball for lots of kids growing up and the expansion of the game (not MLB, just baseball) globally. The only thing that might have “watered down” the game is the elimination (or, if you prefer, reduction) of steroid usage. But that’s not exactly a bad thing…
×
×
  • Create New...