Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    54,836

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Bellhorn04
    "Might" is right. Your final verdict will depend on how Downs develops, right?
  2. Bellhorn04
    Needless to say he's a perfect fit. How high do you have to go to get him is the question.
  3. Bellhorn04
    Risk factors are everywhere. Lindor signs with the Mets for 341 million and turns in a .734 OPS. Mike Trout misses most of the season with a strained calf - a strained freakin' calf, on an innocent-looking play.
  4. Bellhorn04
    About risk factor: -Carl Crawford had a much higher WAR for his age when we signed him than Seager has. -Red Sox fans consider the Crawford signing one of the worst, if not the worst, in team history. -Crawford's deal of 142 million is less than half of what Seager is projected to get!
  5. Bellhorn04
    Seager is a fine player, obviously, but they're projecting him to get 300 million. Man, that's a lot of dough.
  6. Bellhorn04
    I count 9 teams that have given out contracts higher than 217 million.
  7. Bellhorn04
    I wonder if JH decided that the 217 million for Price was the highest he ever wanted to go. When you think about it a bunch of other teams have given out contracts higher than that. Even Seattle!
  8. Bellhorn04
    His existing contract has 4 years and $80 million left. Your offer is reasonable, but in the current market it's probably light. I'd go $150/6, but that would probably be light too!
  9. Bellhorn04
    The biggest spending years were 2018 and 2019.
  10. Bellhorn04
    Red Sox fans are no different. Probably no fans are.
  11. Bellhorn04
    Well, that's one way to look at it, I guess.
  12. Bellhorn04
    And I said E-Rod's isn't team-friendly.
  13. Bellhorn04
    ??? E-Rod's deal is not team-friendly.
  14. Bellhorn04
    Over 2019-2021 Pina had 432 PA's. Vazquez had 498 in 2021 alone. I get why you guys like Pina, but he'd have to be a BUC.
  15. Bellhorn04
    Is it possible that Houck, who has shown himself quite capable of 3-5 inning mow-downs, could be wasted as a 'conventional closer'?
  16. Bellhorn04
    We all have our own hot takes.
  17. Bellhorn04
    And he has also shown himself to operate at an unhurried pace even without the CBA concerns...
  18. Bellhorn04
    How many innings is Pina capable of playing, though?
  19. Bellhorn04
    Kyle and Corey are Seagers Pete is a Seeger Bob is a Seger
  20. Bellhorn04
    If the Yankees do sign C. Seager for the expected $30 mill AAV, they'll have $88 mill AAV in 3 players, Cole, Seager and Stanton, for a while to come.
  21. Bellhorn04
    I don't know, the fact that E Rod signed so quick might just mean the Tigers' offer was too good to resist. $77 mill and an opt-out after 2 years was a pretty sweet offer. Especially with all the so-called uncertainty with the new CBA etc. Maybe E-Rod's agent said 'I suggest you jump all over this, my friend!', and E-Rod had to agree.
  22. Bellhorn04
    All I can say is about E-Rod's deal is that it seems to be a good sign for the financial health of the game.
  23. Bellhorn04
    My concern about putting both these guys in the Opening Day rotation is that it's a little risky to do it with two guys at once.
  24. Bellhorn04
    MLBTR projected $27/3.
  25. Bellhorn04
    No. In 2019 they returned virtually the same team that won 108 and the WS. The only loss was Kimbrel. If you call that a semi-cliff year I really have no idea what your definition of a cliff is.
×
×
  • Create New...