The whole point is that instant replay shouldn't be used to detect if the foot lifted off the bag by a millimeter for a nanosecond after it hit the bag. It should be used to detect if the foot hit the bag before the tag (or the force out). It's a simple argument. If you disagree, that's fine, obviously.
Anyone who wouldn't want Max Scherzer on their team is insane, of course, but I fear the amount of money he'll command may be too. And the Dodgers are just the team to pay it, with Kershaw probably not coming back.
That's it, no more arguing from me on this topic, it's a little too political. I respect and understand the views of those who are opposed to this.
I think in the final analysis it's one of those "majority rules" issues.
The thing is, you're dealing with the vagaries of the baseball payroll system, with its built-in hefty instant raises.
I did a comparison not long ago between E-Rod and Stroman. It showed that Stroman's pitching fWAR per inning is about 5% better. But E-Rod is also 22 months younger.
Anyway, you're right that the question is whether that chunk of money could be spent better or not. Hard to say. Glad Bloom is the one who has to make the calls.
OK, but we're also allowed to look at whether it's fair to expect a sliding baseball cleat to maintain perfect contact with a canvas bag. It's not a serious issue like the one with balls and strikes.
Thanks.
This rule needs to be re-written too, methinks.
I mean, home plate isn't even a square, or rectangular shape - it's a rectangle and a triangle stuck together. , or an "irregular pentagon", that tapers to a point. Not ideal.
And now a question regarding the strike zone.
Does it actually say in the rule book that the strike zone is based on the entire surface of home plate, or is it only the front line of the plate?
If it's only the front of the plate, that would make robo calls of balls and strikes much simpler.