Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    54,803

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Bellhorn04
    It definitely does count.
  2. Bellhorn04
    I think all I did was point out that a number of teams had clearly abandoned the mantra of re-setting every third year.
  3. Bellhorn04
    It's like Whitlock wanting to be a starter. Sometimes management has to make the decision for the player, for the good of everyone...
  4. Bellhorn04
    Well, he's a highly paid DH, and expectations of highly paid DHs are, well...high. We had the best with Ortiz, and then we had another excellent one with JDM, and JDM was starting to catch his fair share of abuse in his latter seasons...
  5. Bellhorn04
    Why is Henry any different than all the CBOs he has sent packing? When Henry bought the Sox, we were lucky, but he was lucky too. He had a strong baseball and marketing man in Lucchino. And Lucchino brought in Epstein. Lucchino probably had more to do with our rings than Henry.
  6. Bellhorn04
    Hey, we've been demanding our butts off, but all we get from Henry and Kennedy is a scolding. 🙂
  7. Bellhorn04
    It sucks that Trout's brilliant career has been waylaid by injuries and playing on a crap team.
  8. Bellhorn04
    And I agree with you. But we've never heard the end of how Dombrowski put us on the road to ruin with Price and Sale. High-priced pitching has become absurdly risky. I'm not sure what the answer is, other than guessing right.
  9. Bellhorn04
    I really have my doubts they go after Burnes or Fried. I think their risk aversion about those kind of contracts is very real. (And may even be justified, based on the breakdown rate of pitchers). Hell, they wouldn't even beat $53 million to sign Imanaga.
  10. Bellhorn04
    But after the signing the consensus was that the Sox paid much more than Yoshida was worth. And that has proven to be accurate.
  11. Bellhorn04
    The Padres did an amazing job bolstering their pitching this year.
  12. Bellhorn04
    I don't think owners should be viewed differently from players or managers. We were all extremely grateful to Pedro for what he did for us, but most Sox fans think his departure after 2004 was for the best. Francona and Dombrowski were shown the door in spite of numerous winning seasons and championships. Success doesn't give anyone a lifetime pass to stick around and soak up adulation. The only difference is you can't fire or trade the owner.
  13. Bellhorn04
    And I can't help wondering if Henry has been feeling a little less motivated because the Yankees haven't won it all since 2009. The Yankees are always the elephant in the room for the Red Sox.
  14. Bellhorn04
    But I thought you were saying all JH did was set the budget and the rest was up to Bloom to figure out? In any case, you've admitted they could have done it, so it's kind of case closed.
  15. Bellhorn04
    Well, OK, they could have if Bloom "gutted". Any way you look at it, saying "they couldn't do it" is unequivocally FALSE.
  16. Bellhorn04
    Now that's the kind of plain language I'm talkin' about! 😀
  17. Bellhorn04
    Exactly what I'm trying to say! moon doesn't seem to get this distinction. He's using this circular logic of "we couldn't afford it because Henry slashed the budget!"
  18. Bellhorn04
    Well, what exactly do you mean by "We could not match LA?" The answer to that would be a great start to clarification.
  19. Bellhorn04
    Again, this is not about Bloom. I'm not blaming Bloom one iota. He had marching orders.
  20. Bellhorn04
    Well, I apologize if I'm misinterpreting what you're saying, but it's kind of confusing how you're expressing your point, i.e. Isn't slashing the budget evidence we "can't compete with the Dodgers?" If you replaced "can't" with "won't" or "choose not to", it would be much clearer. "Can't" implies a lack of ability, not a lack of desire.
  21. Bellhorn04
    Bringing Eovaldi into it is nonsensical. A $17 million per contract prevents the Boston Red Sox from retaining one of the best players in franchise history? That's just offensive.
  22. Bellhorn04
    Not really. Some would say it's just evidence they wanted to make more profit? You seem to be saying that they have only cut payroll because they had no choice in the matter - as if "they did it, so it must be right".
  23. Bellhorn04
    I think they have decided that a sort of watered-down "mea culpa" approach is the best they can do. They're trying to give the impression they're being "accountable". The one thing they will not do is admit that the lowered budgets have hurt the team's chances. Because that would be pointing the finger at JH.
  24. Bellhorn04
    Agreed. At this point I feel like all I can do is derive a twisted sort of entertainment from their messaging shenanigans.
  25. Bellhorn04
    As for the delay in trading Betts, I think there's an excellent chance they delayed because they didn't want to impact the decisions of season ticket buyers. Bloom did kind of lie in December when he said there were no plans to trade Betts. I think he phrased it a bit more ambiguously than that, something like, "I'm proceeding on the assumption he will be part of the 2020 team". At that point the media clearly had no idea that the Sox had actually been in discussions to trade Betts at the deadline in 2019.
×
×
  • Create New...