Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    54,897
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Wins are all pretty to me now.
  2. I agree with mvp on this. They aren't going to exercise the option and then trade him. That's the kind of thing armchair GM's love to talk about but hardly ever happens in reality.
  3. I tried it a few times when I was a kid. You're right, if you flip 100 times the odds are actually against it coming out 50-50. But it will hover quite closely around 50% if you flip it 100 times or more - that's guaranteed.
  4. Pythagoras says we are the best team in the league. That'll be small consolation if we miss the playoffs. (See you over in the Lineup Discussions thread.)
  5. Red Sox Night games .826 OPS Day games .800 AL overall Night games .753 OPS Day games .739 OPS So we have just a little bit more of a dropoff in day games than the league in general.
  6. Both statements are just guesses without any statistical breakdown and comparisons to other teams.
  7. Now that's utter nonsense.
  8. OK, it's luck or randomness. But apparently it's a form of luck or randomness that can be sustained for a long time. If I'm flipping a coin it might come up heads the first 5 times in a row, but if I keep flipping it will correct to 50% very quickly. A good hitter might be able to hit .400 for 50 games, but he will regress to .300 by the end of the season. But a team who beats their Pythagorean record by 5 games might very well do it again the following season. The correction factor seems weak to me. That is my real point.
  9. I love numbers, but if Pythagorean record can be out of whack for as long a time frame as 4 years, it really doesn't mean very much IMO. Sure it works as a general correlation-common sense tells us it must-that's about it.
  10. There's a rumor that JF's 2 neurons mated and there's a little third one helping out now.
  11. Yes, when I checked GameDay in the 8th it showed Porcello still in the game at 130 pitches...I guess the operator was drunk.
  12. Big Dick is also getting over 7 runs a game in run support, which is rather incredible. Here are the runs they've scored for him in descending order, leaving out the boring ones: 16 13 13 12 11 10 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 5 5
  13. He missed about 2 weeks with the flu so that had a lot to do with it. Farrell figures tomorrow he's got Kimbrel, Kelly, Barnes, Ross and Abad to work with at minimum.
  14. 9th straight Quality Start for 20-game winner Big Dick Rick Porcello!
  15. I'll vouch for that Slasher, you haven't wavered a bit.
  16. I don't disagree. Porcello has been fantastic this year.
  17. If we don't have Buchholz next year, we have to do something about our lack of rotation depth. Guys like Owens and Johnson don't seem to be it, and Kopech won't be ready yet.
  18. You said by the numbers he wasn't the ace. I provided some numbers that say he is. That was the point of that post. I think Porcello has been a little better. But the expectations for Price were a lot higher so that tends to factor into perceptions. Porcello has really benefitted from run support too. When the team wins every time you take the ball it makes you look pretty damn good.
  19. Maybe Pythagoras can be beaten. 2013 Yankees were +6 vs. Pythagorean record 2014 +7 2015 -1 2016 +5 Total +17 for 4 years.
  20. FanGraphs has Price as our ace over Porcello, 4.5 WAR to 4.0 WAR. Prices has more innings and a better FIP.
  21. $13 million really isn't much of a commitment any more. We're paying that much for 2 years of a platoon outfielder (and Young is making that deal look good.) It's certainly possible you could do better with the $13 mill, there are also a lot of ways you could do worse. Or I could say 'let's just see what happens', which would be the most sensible position, but as always it's more fun jibber-jabbering and arguing about it.
  22. Has to be a coincidence. The wake-up call would have been when they signed Hill.
×
×
  • Create New...