Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Old Red said:

I told you they didn’t get it, and they still don’t. Bregman was plan A, and Alonso was the first choice to along with plan A. The Red Sox got neither, and went to cheaper options. It’s really not that difficult to understand?

Apparently it is for some here. Good thing there are astute fans like you and me here 😉

Old-Timey Member
Posted
12 minutes ago, Old Red said:

I told you they didn’t get it, and they still don’t. Bregman was plan A, and Alonso was the first choice to along with plan A. The Red Sox got neither, and went to cheaper options. It’s really not that difficult to understand?

“Plan A” just means what gets reported first.  No one on here knows all the orders of the conversations and back-and-forths.  I know you’ve tried to establish yourself as bring in the room where it happens, but the issue is you don’t really know how much you don’t really know…

Posted

I'd prefer Durbin, IKF & Monasterio over DHam, Drohan and maybe Harrison, but I do think we could have gotten Durbin or IKF plus Schwarber or Alonso and been much better.

I do notice you stopped saying Schwarber, Alonso, Breggie or Bichette.

I don't think the $6M spent on IKF prevented one of those signings, and I know you don't either. I'm not sure why you coach it that way.

You were fine with R Suarez, Contreras and Gray, but you wanted at least one more big bat. Some you listed (Schwarber & Alonso) are doing okay or well. Some are doing poorly to okay (Bregman) and some are off to horrible starts (Bichette and ESuarez.) Some of my suggested gets are doing poorly to okay, too.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
30 minutes ago, moonslav59 said:

I'd prefer Durbin, IKF & Monasterio over DHam, Drohan and maybe Harrison, but I do think we could have gotten Durbin or IKF plus Schwarber or Alonso and been much better.

I do notice you stopped saying Schwarber, Alonso, Breggie or Bichette.

I don't think the $6M spent on IKF prevented one of those signings, and I know you don't either. I'm not sure why you coach it that way.

You were fine with R Suarez, Contreras and Gray, but you wanted at least one more big bat. Some you listed (Schwarber & Alonso) are doing okay or well. Some are doing poorly to okay (Bregman) and some are off to horrible starts (Bichette and ESuarez.) Some of my suggested gets are doing poorly to okay, too.

This conversation has drifted too far.  The original point was the Sox could have added MULTIPLE elite hitters.  The counter was ALONSO AND BREGMAN ARE NOT ELITE HITTERS.  Just because they are better than 5 or 6 guys on the Sox does not make them elite hitters.  It doesn’t change whether or not they were Plan A or better than IKF.  Alonso and Bregman are above average hitters likely to become average hitters in the next couple of seasons.  I get the current lineup is frustrating.  These two (and Bichette) have been as well, not to mention in two or three years, the same people saying “release Yoshida and bring in someone better” will be spearheading the charge to “release Bregman and bring in someone better.”  And be calling Henry cheap because he isn’t willing to dump a player with $70million left on his deal.

Anyone bringing up IKF is a clear straw man.   And not even a good one.

Bringing Gasper into it caused my IQ to drop 30 points just reading the sentence.  My only hope is “maybe it’s a joke that isn’t funny.  Not every joke is funny.  It happens.”  Anyone seriously bringing up Gasper as the Sox substitute for Schwarber/Alonso should be slapped and sterilized.  We realize there’s no hope for you, but we also need to make sure it ends here.

The only “elite” options this past off-season were Tucker, who didn’t need to be the Sox radar.  And I can see an argument for Bichette.  Bo has struggled the last few seasons with injury, but he has shown himself to be a very good hitter and is the right age for a breakout.  But his recent health issues also make him a huge gamble.

Alonso and Bregman are the types of free agents best avoided.  I’m glad Boston did…

Old-Timey Member
Posted
1 hour ago, FredLynn said:

Apparently it is for some here. Good thing there are astute fans like you and me here 😉

Con Man was cheaper than Alonso. Ranger was cheaper than Bregman, and DUBin was just plain cheap. Some think plan A was just what was reported first. OMG, and Good Golly Miss Molly.🙈

Posted
48 minutes ago, moonslav59 said:

I wanted Alosno, too, and I'd have been okay with Alonso & Contreras, booting Masa and trading an OF'er for a 2B/3Bman (good bat or not.)

I think what some fans don't differentiate is that all these moves are 'okay', but never, ever consider the long-term results.  It's entirely possible that Alonso will out-play Contreras this year.  But over two years, Alonso could even be ahead by 1-2 WAR, but then you are stuck with his salary for three more years.

Posted
1 hour ago, moonslav59 said:

It wasn't a signing, and certainly did not prevent another addition. We claimed him off waivers and pay him the minimum.

Every team adds players like this and hope they never need to call them up.

Casual fans don't understand AAA depth.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
1 minute ago, JoeBrady said:

I think what some fans don't differentiate is that all these moves are 'okay', but never, ever consider the long-term results.  It's entirely possible that Alonso will out-play Contreras this year.  But over two years, Alonso could even be ahead by 1-2 WAR, but then you are stuck with his salary for three more years.

I agree, and that’s why I said at the time when the Red Sox first signed Bregman that the money was too much, but the length of 3 years was just right. 5 years was to many for Bregman.

Posted
1 hour ago, Old Red said:

Bregman was plan A, and Alonso was the first choice to along with plan A. The Red Sox got neither, and went to cheaper options.

I can't believe that people are still pining for Bregman.  For the price of Alonso & Bregman (1.6 bWAR), we got Contreras, Suarez & Durbin (2.8 bWAR).

Posted
1 hour ago, notin said:

No one on here knows all the orders of the conversations and back-and-forths.

Fred & Red apparently have inside sources in the RS FO.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Old Red said:

I agree, and that’s why I said at the time when the Red Sox first signed Bregman that the money was too much, but the length of 3 years was just right. 5 years was to many for Bregman.

So we made the right move not signing him?  And I assume everyone agrees that adding Contreras over Alonso was correct as well.

Is it that two rights make a wrong?

Posted
35 minutes ago, notin said:

Bringing Gasper into it caused my IQ to drop 30 points just reading the sentence.

Fred thinks we signed Gaspar for minor league pay as some sort of equivalent to spending $42M on Bichette.  But even worse, he is the last person on the planet that still wants Bichette.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
23 minutes ago, JoeBrady said:

So we made the right move not signing him?  And I assume everyone agrees that adding Contreras over Alonso was correct as well.

Is it that two rights make a wrong?

I already answered the Bregman question, and I said before the offseason started I would have signed Alonso, so no I don’t agree on Con Man. How it all works out time will tell.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
28 minutes ago, JoeBrady said:

Fred & Red apparently have inside sources in the RS FO.

NO ONE had to have inside sources inside the RS FO to know that Bregman was Plan A, and if they did most of RSN knew it. Obviously some on here didn’t.🙈

Old-Timey Member
Posted
46 minutes ago, JoeBrady said:

I think what some fans don't differentiate is that all these moves are 'okay', but never, ever consider the long-term results.  It's entirely possible that Alonso will out-play Contreras this year.  But over two years, Alonso could even be ahead by 1-2 WAR, but then you are stuck with his salary for three more years.

This would have been a great year to go for gold. We have our ace. We have Ranger and other good SPing. We have a stud in Anthony though he’s off to a slow start. We have a great setup man and closer in the pen. Had Henry spent on the pen and obtained a couple of very good offensive players (they were available) we could have made a deep run in the playoffs. Instead he urinated away that chance by once again going cheap and signing bums and also-rans. You don’t waste opportunities like this when you have the basis for a very good team. Unless of course your priority is to make as much money as possible and screw the team and its fans.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
1 hour ago, notin said:

This conversation has drifted too far.  The original point was the Sox could have added MULTIPLE elite hitters.  The counter was ALONSO AND BREGMAN ARE NOT ELITE HITTERS.  Just because they are better than 5 or 6 guys on the Sox does not make them elite hitters.  It doesn’t change whether or not they were Plan A or better than IKF.  Alonso and Bregman are above average hitters likely to become average hitters in the next couple of seasons.  I get the current lineup is frustrating.  These two (and Bichette) have been as well, not to mention in two or three years, the same people saying “release Yoshida and bring in someone better” will be spearheading the charge to “release Bregman and bring in someone better.”  And be calling Henry cheap because he isn’t willing to dump a player with $70million left on his deal.

Anyone bringing up IKF is a clear straw man.   And not even a good one.

Bringing Gasper into it caused my IQ to drop 30 points just reading the sentence.  My only hope is “maybe it’s a joke that isn’t funny.  Not every joke is funny.  It happens.”  Anyone seriously bringing up Gasper as the Sox substitute for Schwarber/Alonso should be slapped and sterilized.  We realize there’s no hope for you, but we also need to make sure it ends here.

The only “elite” options this past off-season were Tucker, who didn’t need to be the Sox radar.  And I can see an argument for Bichette.  Bo has struggled the last few seasons with injury, but he has shown himself to be a very good hitter and is the right age for a breakout.  But his recent health issues also make him a huge gamble.

Alonso and Bregman are the types of free agents best avoided.  I’m glad Boston did…

Nice rant. But it ignores the fact that bums like IKF, Gaspar, and Durbin are on the roster and more talented players like Schwarber, Alonso, and Bregman are not. BresLOW is incompetent. The end result is another last place team.

Enjoy it

Old-Timey Member
Posted
27 minutes ago, Old Red said:

NO ONE had to have inside sources inside the RS FO to know that Bregman was Plan A, and if they did most of RSN knew it. Obviously some on here didn’t.🙈

Brady doesn’t read the Flops media articles. If he did he’d have to acknowledge that nearly every media outlet had Bregman as the number one target, whether you agree with that position or not.

Posted
10 minutes ago, FredLynn said:

Brady doesn’t read the Flops media articles. If he did he’d have to acknowledge that nearly every media outlet had Bregman as the number one target, whether you agree with that position or not.

I think he was taking the lead from others on here who just can’t comprehend THE POINT. They seem to point in another direction altogether.🤔

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...