Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Community Moderator
Posted

Career .280 hitter with only 2 hr's since the start of 2010.

 

Gross. It's not like he's Vince Coleman on the base paths.

  • Replies 4.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Does being a poor home run hitter automatically mean you are a bad player..... let alone a bench fill in guy?

 

In Sweeney's case, YES!!!!!! The guy can't run, has no power or run producing potential and is a singles hitter playing in a power position. Cherington signing this dodo simply confirms the low regard I have for him as a GM. A crappy signing. OTOH, at least we don't have to face the spectre of seeing "Lazy Lars" Anderson polluting our lineup ever again. Chances are his stay in Chicago won't be too long either.

Posted
Sweeney's only bright spots at the plate last year were in April. In his last 151 plate appearances before hitting the self-destruct button on his season at the end of July, he posted a remarkably bad line of 200/253/271.
Posted
Sweeney's only bright spots at the plate last year were in April. In his last 151 plate appearances before hitting the self-destruct button on his season at the end of July, he posted a remarkably bad line of 200/253/271.

 

 

I thought he hit well through most of May, and didn't he have a concussion at the end of May? Not arguing, seriously asking????

Posted
What makes some defensive positions a "power position" and others not?

 

SS, 2B, CF are known as "up the middle" defensive positions. Typically defense is valued higher in these spots as they cover the most "fair" ground on the field and because of that get more defensive attempts over the course of a season. Power is not a must, just a plus at these spots. Inherently if your lacking at power in those "defensive" spots you look to add power in the less demanding defensive positions.

 

That's pretty much the basics of it. Obviously there are exceptions like Hanley, where his glove was passable at the high priority defensive position because his bat was so good.

Posted
SS, 2B, CF are known as "up the middle" defensive positions. Typically defense is valued higher in these spots as they cover the most "fair" ground on the field and because of that get more defensive attempts over the course of a season. Power is not a must, just a plus at these spots. Inherently if your lacking at power in those "defensive" spots you look to add power in the less demanding defensive positions.

 

That's pretty much the basics of it. Obviously there are exceptions like Hanley, where his glove was passable at the high priority defensive position because his bat was so good.

 

Thank you.

Posted

Well it's not quite that simple obviously. That's a good place to start understanding the issue, but if it was about number of defensive attempts, first base would be the biggest defensive position on the field instead of one of the presumptively less important.

 

It comes down to where you need your rangiest people and the fact that your rangiest people tend to be quick and light on their fight, which tends to contradict the possibility of also being a power bat. Usually your shortstop is one of your smaller, leaner players, and that makes it harder to muster the ballast to really put a charge into the ball.

 

That said if you have freak like Pedroia who is small, light and fast, but also knows how to sting the ball VERY hard, that's great, and if you have a big guy who's athletic enough to maintain decent range, like Tulowitzki, and maintain himself as a solid to elite up the middle defender, rock on. We're hoping Xander Bogaerts is going to turn into that kind of shortstop, and he's got a fighting chance. But your up the middle guys have to be able to move.

Posted
The addition of Sweeney is just a fill-in to compete with Nava as the backup LF. Just because we signed Sweeney does not mean anything. We can still sign another LF OF, even if the odds are slim. I just don't like the fact that we only have Nava and Sweeney competing for time in LF. I would much rather have a healthy Kalish over a door punching Sweeney.
Posted
Sweeney's only bright spots at the plate last year were in April. In his last 151 plate appearances before hitting the self-destruct button on his season at the end of July, he posted a remarkably bad line of 200/253/271.

 

You know Bellhorn, I'm still waiting for someone to tell me that I am wrong, that Sweeney will be fine as a possible platoon partner for lefty crushing but righty pansy Gomes. No one has come forth so that tells me this is one time just about all of us are on the same page. Of course, it might turn out that Sweeney will not be the one but rather Nava. Wow!!!!!! Some improvement there.

:dunno::dunno::dunno::dunno::dunno::dunno::dunno::dunno:

Posted
I thought he hit well through most of May, and didn't he have a concussion at the end of May? Not arguing, seriously asking????

 

For a short time I was convinced you were just trying to provoke some of us with some of the questions you asked, but no more. You're a straight shooter all the way so I will try to give you my take on why Sweeney is not what we need. He is a big guy but he has NO power---two home runs since 2010 according to MVP 78, who pretty much always knows about these kind of things. He has putrid speed so he can't run. Can't run and hit for power and he is a corner outfielder? Pardone senior but that is not what you need out in a corner outfield position. He is a good fielder and singles hitter but we saw how he faded even before he committed self hari-kari last summer. We can do better and we need a little more power out there that he can give---which is next to nothing.

Posted
Well it's not quite that simple obviously. That's a good place to start understanding the issue, but if it was about number of defensive attempts, first base would be the biggest defensive position on the field instead of one of the presumptively less important.

 

It comes down to where you need your rangiest people and the fact that your rangiest people tend to be quick and light on their fight, which tends to contradict the possibility of also being a power bat. Usually your shortstop is one of your smaller, leaner players, and that makes it harder to muster the ballast to really put a charge into the ball.

 

That said if you have freak like Pedroia who is small, light and fast, but also knows how to sting the ball VERY hard, that's great, and if you have a big guy who's athletic enough to maintain decent range, like Tulowitzki, and maintain himself as a solid to elite up the middle defender, rock on. We're hoping Xander Bogaerts is going to turn into that kind of shortstop, and he's got a fighting chance. But your up the middle guys have to be able to move.

 

With our questionable starting pitching Doj, I would think our middle guys have to be able to hit as well. See ya Jose.

Posted
It would help, but the big thing the big defensive players at the big defensive positions provide is a chende to make the pitching look better. If we weren't so obsessed with shortstops who "at least hit a little" we'd have taken a different and arguably better direction at short over the last several years, especially since the "offensive" shortstops we've brought since 07 (Lugo, Aviles) in have only been "offensive" in the sense that it offends me to watch them try to hit.
Posted
It would help, but the big thing the big defensive players at the big defensive positions provide is a chende to make the pitching look better. If we weren't so obsessed with shortstops who "at least hit a little" we'd have taken a different and arguably better direction at short over the last several years, especially since the "offensive" shortstops we've brought since 07 (Lugo, Aviles) in have only been "offensive" in the sense that it offends me to watch them try to hit.

 

Since Lugo left, most of the shortstops we've seen have been average defensively. If you look at UZR or any of those advanced stats, they're all very much dead-center average.

 

The real problem has been catchers-- all of which have been significantly below average defensively, and that does include Tek.

Posted
Tek was great at handling pitchers and game prep. He was average to tolerable as a defensive catcher for a period but as he aged he went from tolerable to "what was that" status. His throwing really tanked as he aged.
Posted

 

The real problem has been catchers-- all of which have been significantly below average defensively, and that does include Tek.

 

Posted
Your outrage doesn't make it any less true. :lol:

 

No personal outrage, lol. I generally agreed with you. For some odd reason Arty Spooners "how dare you" jumped into my mind as the reaction of Sox fans to you saying something negative about Tek.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...