Rizzo is the one guy I was disappointed that Bloom did not get. Hard to equate what players from the Sox farm.
The Fangraphs Future Value system at least gives me a way to compare, but even it has flaws. But let's use it.
Alcatara (FV: 50) and Vizcaino (FV: 45)gave the Cubs a decent return on Rizzo. From the Sox system ,in oprder to give them two prospects with a FV total of 95, we would need to include a one FV: 50 prospect and one FV 45 or 45+ (really a 45+ to "top" the Yankee offer).
Before the season, the Sox had two prospects with FV of 50 - Casas and Downs. Downs has not made hiself look like a good trade piece so far this year, so it looks like we would need to include Casas.
For the FV 45+: Mata and Jimenez. Has to be Jimenez, as Mata is out with TJ.
For the FV: 45 - Noah Song, Tanner Houck, Jarren Duran, Connor Seabold, Bobby Dalbec (it's a preseason ranking)
Realisitcally Duran has probably aded value and Downs has lost value.
The Cuba also took a pitcher in Vizcaino, and this is probably not a coincidence. Pitchers on this list that are not good trad include Mata and Song.
So to get Rizzo, it might have taken something like one of Casas or Duran and one of Houck or Seabold. Would you have dealt Casas and Houck? Or Duran and Seabold? Or who?
At least using this objective system. But the bottom line is, some sort of Potts/Groome package was not going to get anything done.,..