moonslav59

Slaten looks "core" to me. We can argue all day what "core" or "foundation" mean, but I think the guys I listed will have key roles on the team for their remaining controlled years. I can see MVP's point about "core" needing to be more than a utility type player, so I'll break it down, player-by-player. Devers, Duran and Houck are core in any sense of the word. I guess I can understand someone thinking we have only 3 core players that have unquestionable star status. Bello, Crawford, Whitlock and Slaten look to be significant plus pitchers, especially if used in correct roles. Wong needs to improve on defense to be viewed as a plus starting catcher, and maybe he will. It took VTek a long time to get to plus-plus on D. Just a little improvement would make him a very good back-up catcher, who can PH or play 2B, at times. (Teel offers some hope, but I would not call him "core," just yet.) Casas has yet to put up a monster year, but his 162 game line from 2023-2024 is .256 31 81 (.838 OPS and 126 OPS+) The guy turns 25, soon. If he is not core, then I guess I am willing to argue semantics. Story could be "core," if he remains healthy. His years of control are dwindling, which could be fine, as long as Mayer comes through. Mayer and Campbell are speculative core. I'll leave it at that. Meidroth has some hope for near-term contributions. Abreu and Rafaela both have a major flaw that needs fixing, in order to be called FT core players. Abreu needs to hit LHPs, but can still be a major plus, if platooned. Rafaela needs to hit .700 or .720 to be a FT player. That does not seem like an impossible task, at his age. As some sort of platoon, these two, combined could be viewed as one single "core" player. Maybe, someday they can be two. To me, Anthony seems to be a sure bet MLB core player, but I can understand wanting to wait on that label. Other pitchers all have flaws or too few years of control to be considered as core. On a 13 man staff, some should add value in limited roles: Gio & Hendriks have one year left and injury-recovery issues. Winckowski has some flashy numbers, along with others not-so-flashy ones. Out of 150 pitchers with 160+ IP since 2023, Wink has the 23rd best ERA- at 80. (He's 61st in SIERA at 3.98, 64th i XFIP at 4.01, but 126th in WHIP at 1.42.) Call him a useful mid-pen guy. Guerrero has a lot to prove. The rest might be useful pen depth but more like #11-13 or AAA guys. Penrod, Kelly, Bernardino, Weissert, Mata and I Campbell have some hope. Booser, Wilson, Fulmer, Shugart and others may not last the season. Priester, Fitts, Criswell and Dobbins look promising, to me, but not "core," just yet. Perales might be a full season or 1.5 away. I won't go down to AA and lower players, but we have some promise below our top 5-6 prospects. I think we have a decent core and foundation of players, at or pre-prime, who have 3 or more years of control. Many are not even to year one arbs and no key players are even at year 2. We have a 2-3 year window, where we will have a pretty big core of lower-cost players to supplement the FAs we should add.

I'm almost willing to take back anything with a heartbeat for Yoshida, if the money saved is used to add some value to the roster, or the player we get back has some hope of contributing at a position of higher need. When healthy, his "value" might be between $3M a year up to maybe $10M a year, if he is showing he can hit .780-.800. I'm not sure about Walker. Certainly his recent numbers show he has zero or negative value, aside from the contract, but if he shows signs he can rebound, maybe he'd be worth a risk.

It's what you want, but maybe 3-4 teams have that, now. Teams look to improve, sometimes with baby steps, and most teams look to do it cheaply. All it takes is one team to think Yoshida is better than the SH they have and what it would be worth to get him as an upgrade. When you look at the DHs from 2023-2024, Yoshida falls about in the middle in OPS. Probably 10-15 teams would view Yoshida as an upgrade over their DH, but they might prefer a DH who can play a position, too. My guess is maybe 5-10 teams would take him for $3-5M a year. Maybe 10-15 might take him at $1-2M a year. Just guessing. (Maybe 1-3 teams might want him at $5-7M a year, but who knows?)

He has a career 111 OPS+. He has value as a DH. It's just not $18M/yr value. Once he shows he's healthy, I think we could trade him with $10-13M a year for a single A player. There is no need to waste $5-8M a year by DFA'ing him.

60 Day IL or bench or trade

Watching my Packers, tonight, I could not help but think how blessed we have been with high quality QBs, almost every year since Bart Starr. A QB rating of 75 or better is considered very good to excellent. I'm not going year-by-year, but here are the QBs we have had on the roster and their career QB rating with the Packers, only. 1956-1971 Bart Starr 80.5 4 years off 1976-1985 Lynn Dickey 73.8 1 year off 1987-1992 Majkowski 73.5 1992-2007 Favre 85.8 2005-2022 Rogers 103.6 2021-2024 Love 93.4 37 straight seasons with a QB on the roster with a 73.5+ QB rating. 47 out of 48 seasons since 1976. 63 out of 68 seasons since 1956. SF has had some great QBs, but this stretch is pretty damn awesome.

We finished 3rd with this line-up minus Anthony and most of Story & Grissom. A DHam-Grissom platoon with Campbell should improve or 2B slot. Story + Mayer/Campbell should improve the SS slot. Add Higgy or Jansen and our catcher O should be better. Almost every other player "from last year" is on the upswing towards their prime years. Why do you assume no improvement?

Simply sign Soto, Bregman, Fried, Scott & Higgy. Trade: Abreu, Fitts & Kelly for Crochet 1. Duran CF 2. Soto LF 3. Bregman 3B 4. Devers 1B/DH 5. Casas DH/1B 6. Story SS 7. Anthony RF 8. Campbell 2B 9. Higgy-Wong C Bench: Rafaela, DHam, Grissom & Wong/Higgy SP: Fried, Crochet, Houck, Bello, Giolito RP: Scott, Slaten, Whitlock, Hendriks, Crawford, Guerrero, Winckowski, Wilson/Bernardino

A big stir of the pot- all over one no-name guy on X.

I agree, and this supports the view: Away numbers: ERA/ OPS Against/WHIP 4.07/.673/1.095 Miller (Career: 4.52/.714/1.146) 4.32/.727/1.092 Crawford (Career: 4.06/.701/1.104) Crawford has better 2023 and career road numbers, though.

More likely, Brez trades other players, so Yoshida becomes the best DH option, at least vs RHPs. I would guess Abreu and DHam will be traded, perhaps even if we don't promote Campbell or Mayer. C: Wong + _____ 1B: Casas (Romy) 2B: Grissom (Rafaela/Romy) SS: Story (Rafaela/Romy) 3B: Devers (Romy/Grissom) LF: Duran (Ref) CF: Rafaela (Duran) RF: Anthony (Ref/Raf) DH: Yoshida (Ref)

Agreed. My point has been, if he's healthy, he is ML ready.

I think our #9-18 pen depth may be better than most teams. If we add 2 solid pen arms, thereby pushing others down 2 slots, our 9-18 would look top 8-10, to me. Our issue is our top 2-3 pen arms.

Only the injuries have held him back.

Soto's numbers per 162: '23-'24: .281 39 111 (.415 OBP, .545 SLG, 166 OPS+) '20-'21: .322 34 108 (.471/.572/ 185 OPS+) Career: .285 35 102 (.421/.532/ 160 OPS+) 2018-2024 OPS (3500+ PAs) 1.014 Judge .953 Soto (.421 OBP is #1 and .014 ahead of Judge.) .945 Ohtani .931 Betts .925 Freeman .918 Harper 11. Devers .858 BB/K 1.10 Soto 1.02 Bregman 0.88 Jose Ramirez 0.87 Santana 0.83 Betts

I'd think if $600M/12 is that close to sealing the deal, we could go to $640M/14, if someone counters.

MLB OBP .312 in 2024 (and 2022) It was .320 in 2023. .312 is the lowest since 1972. It was over .330, every year, from 2004 to 2009. That's a 20 point drop from over a decade ago. It was above .340 3 times from 1996 to 2000. I think one could argue that .340 is the "new" .350 or even .360. Duran was at about .345 from '23 to '24, which is the 20 point from from your .365. Out of 115 batters with 1,000+ PAs since 2023, Duran places 38th at .343- just behind Jose Ramirez and Gunnar Henderson, but ahead of Bregman and Lindor. He's 49th out of 186 with 800+ PAs. 57th out of 271 with 600+ (top 21%)

Of course we'd all be concerned, same way were were with Pedey, JBJ, Beni and Betts. Many of the best prospects jump from AA to the bigs or have just a brief stay in AAA. Yes, it'a concern that he never got to play in AAA, due to the injury the day of his call-up. His injuries have slowed his ability to prove his readiness. I do think Anthony is "more ready," and Campbell was so great in 2024, that he seem "more ready," too. I do remember reading a few articles a year or two ago, that thought Mayer would be ML ready by 2024. The injuries got in the way. I do think if Story gets hurt, Mayer would take the job from Romy and DHam in a matter of days, or even hours. Bogey and Betts had less PAs at AA + AAA than Mayer, and Bogey only played 10 games at 3B before becoming our FT 3Bman in a playoff hunt season. We were concerned, of course, but he was "ready."

Yup. This could be a massive letdown, and when coupled with the loss of Betts, 5 years ago, could be the final nail in JH's coffin. He'd have been better off keeping any offers quiet.

He can also turn a BB into a 2B with a SB. His ability to score from 1B on a 2B cannot be forgotten, either. I'm not sure I have ever seen a baserunner take an extra base more than Duran did in 2024. Many times it looked easier than it was.

I like this train of thought. 2023-2024 GB% leaders (200+ IP) 60 Logan Webb 59 Fried 57 C Sanchez, F Valdez 55 Houck 54 Bello 53 Stroman 51 H Brown 50 Suarez, Bradish, Elder, Glasnow, Nate

While MIN is no big spender, they do seem to spend more than many teams. Would you do the same trade and add Story for Correa in the mix? MIN would save, a lot of $$$.

I've seen the data, which is based on league wide averages, and the differential is pretty significant. I do wonder, if the numbers change, if your leadoff guys has a .345 OBP and your #2 is at .420. MLB 2024 OBP 1. .327 2. .326

Let's see how quickly the posters who thought JH would never spend large and long, again change their views. I'm not trying to slight anyone. This trend has been long and steady, and it begs the question on why not just keep Betts at half the price? I think JH was hit by a 2 by 4, but it took him 3-4 years to feel the sting. Call him a thick skull or numbskull, but if he pulls this off, I think Sox nation will breathe a great big sigh. If we come up short... I can't even think about it, now. He'd have to sign Burnes, Fried, Scott and more....

15-20 more PAs than the 4 slot and maybe 35-40 more than the 5 slot might cancel that out.