Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    106,944
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    143

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. He should play the full season at WOO
  2. We can't agree on what a #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5 are on this site, and then we all have different ideas on what numbers are more important than others, so asking us to place out pitchers into these categories is bound to get wild fluctuation. My methodology is to say you are a number one, if you are a top 30 pitcher in many of the stats that matter to me: ERA-/ERA+, fWAR more than bWAR, FIP and maybe K-BB%. (WAR factors in IP alot, so I don't need that included. A Number two is 31-60, #3 61-90 and so on... What I think is interesting about our SP'er ratings is than so many have pretty high ceilings. One could argue many have low floors, too. The pitchers we have with significant experience have already shown they can pitch well for a season or two, but again, almost all have a bad season or two, as well. Determining their ceiling could be just saying they can repeat their bast year. Only Gray is old enough to say that is unreasonable to expect or even hope for. Here is my floor-ceiling ratings for our SP'ers. High 1- Mid 1 Crochet Mid 2- mid 4 Gray Low 2- high 4 Bello High 3- low 4 Sandoval (Had a 3.7 fWAR in '22 & 2.3 in '23) High 3-mid/low 5 Crawford (2.4 in '23 not fully a SP) Mid 3- low 5 Harrison Mid 3- low 5 Dobbins Low 3- low 6 Criswell Mid 2-???? Early Mid 2-???? Tolle Mid 3-???? Perales
  3. Maybe we get Gore or Lodolo, but more likely no other SP'er.
  4. I have never said I wanted Cease. I've said the opposite. All I said was he is better than his 2025 ERA indicates, and when it was 4.55, that can be a 3-4 type pitcher.
  5. ERA does not account for park or defense, nor strength of opposing offenses. I like ERA- and ERA+, too. I was just responding to your point about the "other stats" not being based on actual numbers, FIP does. I like FIP, but not as much as some on this site. I like ERA- and ERA+ more than FIP, but not way more. If Gray is a #4 in ERA-/ERA+ and a #1 in FIP, I'd be fine calling him a very low 2 or higher 3. If Bello is a 1/2 in ERA-/ERA+ and a 2/3 in FIP, should we can him a solid #2? I wouldn't, and that shows the limitation of stats. To me, Gray and Bello have been 2's at times, 3's at times and 4's at times in the past 2 years. Bello should be getting better while Gray should be getting worse. If they end up our 3-4, I'm fine. I don't like either as our #2, so the bottom line- we agree. We just got there in different ways. I doubt we get a #2, so we better max out on our 2 big bat additions.
  6. All true, but there has been a lot of talk about Peralta.
  7. Good numbers. I like using 3 year sample sizes, however, with pitchers who have only been in MLB for 3 years, it can be a bit deceptive. As with 36 year old pitchers like Gray, maybe the past 1-2 year sample size is a bit more telling. With Bello, 2023 was better than 2024, so the two year sample won't vary much from the 3 year one. Same with Gray. On the 3 year sample size, you listed Bello as 84th in ERA, but he was also 45th in ERA- at 93, which is better than Kirby, Bassitt, Lodolo, Gore and others. 2025 only: (120 SP'ers with 100+ IP) ERA- 31. Bello 78 33. Gio 80 36. Ryan 81 46. Framber 90 50. Singer 91 53. Castillo 93 77. Gray 104 FIP 21. Gray 3.39 29. Cease 3.56 35. Ryan 3.69 38. Gore 3.74 40. Lodolo 3.78 62. Bello 4.12 64. Gio 4.17 I'd like Bello as our #4. Gray would be fine as our #3. That still leave the #2 slot open, but I doubt Brez & Co see it this way.
  8. FIP is based 100% on numbers. Numbers that do not involved the defense behind a pitcher.
  9. Agreed. They may still get Alonso thinking one can dh, but that damn Masa contract!
  10. Even if we could get it to under the $40M overline, it's not happening.
  11. We can't have Campbell (or Garcia) on the 26 to start just 30% of all games (vs LHPs.) They need to play everyday.
  12. Well said. Let's be thankful he wasn't sitting at our table for turkey.
  13. Give it up with that guy. Yes, errors are facts, but he assumes flg% is everything, and he won't budge or even try to understand the nuances to this great game of baseball.
  14. Yes, I posted those numbers, but those are just some that show him as a number 1 (2 at worst.) There are others that show him as a 3. When you are 36 and are coming off two down trending seasons, you have to think further decline is probable. If he was a 1-2, then he might be a 2-3 in 2026. If he was a 2-3, maybe he'll be a 3-4. If he was a 3-4....
  15. Sox sign Vinny Capra (infielder) to minor league deal.
  16. He may to play 1B.
  17. Maybe DD wants some other high-priced FA instead. That could be a way
  18. He can hit 24-26 and still not fill the power need. 24 is 12 more than we got from 2B and 2 more than we got from 3B. If we get Alonso or Schwarber plus Bichette, fine. I still think $240M/7 or 8 is too much. I might prefer Bregman at $150/5 of $170M/6. Polanco at $70-80M/4 might be best, because then we can afford Alonso, Schwarber or K Marte.
  19. With a $10M buyout, he may be back for 2027 (at $30M.) It's "only" $20M more.
  20. So is JH's yacht.
  21. MIL looking to cut salary. Peralta is a one & done, so maybe not too expensive.
×
×
  • Create New...