More than 50% of the "elite bats" from last winter are underperforming or vastly underperforming. When you then consider our track record on selecting "the right guy" with our largest FA bat signings, I do pause to wonder why we put so much hope into that avenue as "the solution." I'm not calling out posters for being wrong, as I was calling for major signings, too, but the results of major bat signings out of the gate does not look good:
In order by largest contract (age) OPS
Tucker (29) .739
Bregman (32) .677
Bellinger (30>31) .899
Alonso (31) .786
Schwarber (33) .893
Bichette (28) .571
None over .900, two doing well (800-900), one doing okay (750-799) and three doing poorly, including one very poorly (under 750)
2-1-3 (more bad than good)
______________
$60-$120M
Naylor (28>29) .681
Okamoto (29>30) .825
1-1
_____________
$25M>$59M
Realmuto (35) .677
Polanco (32>33) .532
Murakami (26) .947 (The only one over 900)
1-2
_________________
Total:
1 Great (Murakami- the guy nobody here wanted)
3 Good (over 800) Schwarber, Bellinger, Okamoto
1 Okay (750-799) Alonso
4 Bad (650-749) Tucker, Bregman, Naylor
2 Horrific (<650) Bichette & Polanco
____________
4 Good to Great
1 Okay
6 Bad or worse
Most of us wanted to see an effort, and the pivot from Bregman to Suarez was a gut punch to hopes for a good offense or better, but he has saved the pitching staff- he and the kids.