Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    54,672

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    75

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Bellhorn04
    No, in a WS game back then it would be a fair play.
  2. Bellhorn04
    Cold.
  3. Bellhorn04
    Good questions.
  4. Bellhorn04
    Rose was a complete jackass and prick doing that in an All Star Game.
  5. Bellhorn04
    Personally I hate seeing any player get injured on the field. With the possible exception of a pulled hammy for a Yankee, I suppose...
  6. Bellhorn04
    Yes, you're 100% correct on that. You did say throwing at or beaned, so I thought you meant any part of the body.
  7. Bellhorn04
    If he had as much money to work with as the Sox do, that might be a whole other story.
  8. Bellhorn04
    I'm okay with pitchers throwing inside, or beaning a guy in the backside. No one should be okay with throwing at a hitter's head.
  9. Bellhorn04
    I don't know, but free agency pretty much started the next year, didn't it?
  10. Bellhorn04
    Who wants to increase HRs? It seems to me one of the biggest complaints now is about too many guys swinging for the fences.
  11. Bellhorn04
    It appears the ball isn't actually any deader. But the seams are higher I believe - which is probably part of the reason MLB cracked down on sticky stuff - the higher seams were sort of an appeasement to the pitchers. That's my conspiracy theory, anyway.
  12. Bellhorn04
    In one of those docs on the '67 Red Sox, Yaz talks about how tough Lonborg was. Yaz said Lonborg would come up to him and ask him if there was anyone he wanted beaned LOL And Lonborg knew there might be reprisal against him personally for beaning someone.
  13. Bellhorn04
    Agreed. And Lonborg had a great season in 1967. Over his career, he was a decent to good pitcher and no more. So we have Gibson and Pedro so far. And there would be a handful of others. We're talking about 'generational' talents.
  14. Bellhorn04
    No doubt.
  15. Bellhorn04
    When you lose a game you can usually point to several reasons. But a bad call against you can certainly be one of the reasons.
  16. Bellhorn04
    In terms of who is getting the most wins out of their payroll, the Rays are beating the (use favorite expletive) out of everyone.
  17. Bellhorn04
    Exactly what I'm saying.
  18. Bellhorn04
    Much of the talk about Bogaerts and Devers on this forum is about their mediocre to bad defense. Mookie was that extreme rarity, a complete player.
  19. Bellhorn04
    Please don't bring up Vazquez again LOL
  20. Bellhorn04
    Very true. Ironically, perhaps, it's the Marlins who have the 2 championships.
  21. Bellhorn04
    I would actually say no to that question. That approach of being close to the limit started in the Theo Epstein glory years. And I think it has a lot to do with our 4 championships. Nick, I do enjoy and respect your opinions here, but to me it sounds a little like you've got 'Rays on the brain', as in, why can't we be the Rays? First of all, I wholeheartedly agree that the Rays are doing a phenomenal job with their payroll limitations. But I don't see how you can dismiss the fact that we're the ones with the most rings this century, and they still don't have one.
  22. Bellhorn04
    You're right, I'm generalizing. I'm not talking about every single fan. But I do think you get a decent feel for the way fans think on forums like this. My point is mainly about Betts and how I don't blame him for not having any 'loyalty' to the Red Sox. If there is a two-way street, it's a cold-blooded one, IMHO. Players want money. Fans want performance.
  23. Bellhorn04
    But fans aren't loyal to the players. This forum makes that obvious. The emotional fans heap abuse on them for playing bad in a particular game. The rational fans talk about how they can be replaced cheaper next year. Am I wrong about that?
  24. Bellhorn04
    Inevitably, when people talk about how great and how mean the old-time pitchers they were, they talk about Gibson. Yes, Gibson was awesome. Now, give me a list of all the other pitchers of that era who were like Gibson. The Red Sox sure as heck didn't have them. The names I remember from listening on the radio starting in 1969 were more like Sonny Siebert and Ray Culp.
  25. Bellhorn04
    I'm trying for the perfect equilibrium where I accept the outcome. Zen Fandom or something like that. Mind you I can only do this because the 4 rings have made me fat and contented as a fan.
×
×
  • Create New...