Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    54,836
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. It was 1 year of Betts for 5 years of Verdugo, that's why it was a good deal.
  2. Do the math though. The difference in money between JBJ and Renfroe is peanuts compared to what it would have taken to sign E-Rod, for example.
  3. Yes, well, to get a player like Duggie you give to give something back like a Mookie Betts. Bloom isn't a miracle-worker. He's not going to get blue chip prospects for trash.
  4. And moon says JBJ is his favorite player.
  5. The explanations seem simple enough to me! But Old Red and moon will continue to be befuddled.
  6. Can't have it both ways. You either trust him or you don't. I'd say you don't.
  7. There haven't been any good $300M contracts yet. Of course, that's partially because they only started handing them out recently. But it remains to be seen if any will be good investments.
  8. You left out the improvement in defense. Our defense needed an upgrade somewhere.
  9. I’m not scratching my head at all. Bloom's approach is a little different, but I think he has an idea what he's doing.
  10. One other thing that occurred to me about trading Renfroe is that not only does he get a raise from 3.1 million to an estimated 7.6 million, but he'll get another similar raise for 2023, in his 3rd year of arbitration. So assuming you wanted to keep Renfroe the next 2 years, you'd be paying him 18-19 million for the 2 years, and then he's a free agent. So while it was a great contract for 2021, for 2022-23 it's not.
  11. Sure, everyone knows that. You're still better off having more of them than less of them, because some do hit paydirt.
  12. No, others have figured out why it was done.
  13. They're very different measurements for pitchers, though. And E-Rod's is about 2 wins different. 1.9 is fairly easy to replace, 3.8 is not. So it does create a bit of confusion using them both for pitchers, IMHO.
  14. I thought you were a Fangraphs guy.
  15. I'm not sure a player with a 3.8 fWAR like E-Rod is "easily" replaced.
  16. Nicely mixed and matched.
  17. It's not inconceivable that Bloom signs Ottavino or Robles, if the price is right.
  18. If you use the old-schooly numbers, sure. Based on new-schooly numbers we have to replace an fWAR of 3.8.
  19. I get what you're saying, but every year is different. And JBJ's upgrade on defense over Renfroe could win a game or two. And Bloom still has more work to do, presumably.
  20. Yeah, the 96 RBI were a fluke, as RBI often are. But of course some folks are going to fixate on certain numbers.
  21. Hey, you're right, we need Fred Flintstone back.
×
×
  • Create New...