If you're hitting .397, the worst OPS you can have is .794, which is an OPS+ of 115-120.
So yeah, you want that guy in your lineup, even if you don't know what his OBP or SLG are.
Arraez has a slash line of 397/447/485 for an OPS of 931, and an OPS+ of 157.
Most of the OPS comes from the BA.
Is that a good thing, bad thing or neutral thing?
You missed the post I was responding to. My point was that batting average still matters to players and fans.
But OK, let's look at OBP. What constitutes the greatest part of OBP?
BA is a starting point for measuring performance. If you have a .000 BA, there's no way the other numbers can be good.
We've focused on the Kluber signing because he's the only starter Bloom signed. The premise is that we badly needed an upgrade to the rotation but didn't get one. That would qualify as a blunder.
Just one of the inexplicable mysteries of the game, how you can go from scoring a lot and giving up a lot to the other extreme. Is it the teams you're playing against? Is it the weather? Who the hell knows?
Bloom's grade for 2023 is still incomplete. Maybe this team can get on another good roll.
3 consecutive good starts by Whitlock, Houck and Bello is very encouraging, although they were against a feeble Yankee offense without Judge.
"How big of a blunder can a $10M/1 year signing be?"
That's a fair question about Kluber. I would think the answer is, "big enough to cost us a spot in the playoffs" - which is big. Not saying that's what's going to happen, but you were asking for a hypothetical.