Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    55,041
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Yeah, it's kind of playing with house money, considering no matter what his lifetime earnings from baseball will be well over $100 mill.
  2. Probably, although a couple of years after that couple of years, it might not. (I have no problem with that signing at all, was very happy they got it done.)
  3. Yes, I believe you're right.
  4. Whatever ideas we come up with will be different from Bloom's ideas. It comes as a shock when he does something obvious, like the Jansen signing...
  5. Of course. He could throw the last pitch of his career any time. But that seems to apply to most pitchers now.
  6. Most Qualifying Offers get turned down, so that doesn't really count. Do we know exactly how much higher the Red Sox offer was than the Rangers' offer? Is it that well documented?
  7. Texas made a great signing with Nate and an apparently horrific signing with deGrom. Pitchers seem to be the ultimate crapshoot.
  8. And now add another Yankee pitcher, Cordero, to the list of domestic abusers.
  9. Yes, a win-win trade that still makes me sad.
  10. Yeah, I think we're talking about 2 separate things. From the Dodgers perspective, I think they were looking at it as getting 60 games plus the chance to keep him. That's what I'm getting at. That's what made it a potentially great trade for them.
  11. I don't agree with this and never have. We didn't just trade 60 games, we gave up the chance of signing him to an extension, and we gave it up to the team that was in the best position to do it. It's quite possible the Dodgers wouldn't have made the trade if they didn't have designs on that. This doesn't have any bearing on what Bloom got back, though. Time has shown that he did well.
  12. Based on this, going into the past offseason, which you said was a big one for Bloom, were you expecting him to put together a .500 team, or something better? And why?
  13. The real argument, though, is that the Sox could have signed him for something a lot more reasonable if they were proactive about it.
  14. Well, not by your standards, I suppose.
  15. 4. I was merely engaging in pointless idle speculation about what-if scenarios that don't matter anyway with regard to Bogaerts, and I don't disagree with anything you said but am mildly surprised at how forcefully you jumped on that pointless speculation.
  16. And Bogaerts has been super durable. If anything he seems to want to play even when he's hurt. Just a model baseball citizen and nice guy. Even more so than with Mookie, I like to see Xander do well even if it's in another uniform.
  17. Sure, while moon focuses on petty minutiae, you're into important things like arguing passionately about the difference between "merely high priority" and "top priority".
  18. No sooner do you say that than Xander goes off. Last 2 games, 5 hits, 2 walks, 2 homers and 6 RBI. It was a ridiculous contract he got from the Padres, but I wish we could have signed him to something reasonable. And not signed Story. Not sure where Xander would have played when Mayer was ready, though.
  19. Bloom could have made better moves. We could easily compile a list of moves that would have been better than signing Story, trading for JBJ and going over the tax line as a result, signing Kluber etc. Some of it would be hindsight and cherry-picking, of course. But it's not like he had no options. I think everyone gets that he inherited a very weak farm. It's the moves involving spending on major league players that can be questioned.
  20. Sale's remaining AAV is about 34 million, so the acquiring team would be on the hook for 17 mill. If he gets back on the mound before the deadline it might be a possibility, but that in itself seems like a long shot.
  21. Can't blame people for being dissatisfied when the team is on its way to another last-place finish. The rebuild and compete thing is only half working.
  22. Can't see him going if we're still in it.
  23. Last year they were 3 back of the last Wild Card at the deadline and didn't sell except for Vazquez. And a lot of people said they should have sold a lot more, of course. I don't think they'll be in any rush to sell this year either. But it's in play.
  24. I finally put him on permanent ignore. Feels good.
×
×
  • Create New...