Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    55,149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. The hit for tax purposes for 2024-2033 is actually $46 million. The cash payments are $2 million a year 2024-2033 and $68 million 2034-2043 (feels crazy just typing that). The tax hit is based on the estimated present value of the cash payments.
  2. According to Forbes it's about 10% less than the Dodgers. https://www.forbes.com/mlb-valuations/list/
  3. We're down to 3 big ones now-Devers, Story and Yoshida.
  4. The OPS slugfest between Dalbec and Grissom goes on.
  5. The good news is he's seeing a lefty tonight. The bad news is it's Fried.
  6. We need some Reverse Lock magic.
  7. It was a noble act of kindness by the Dodgers. John Henry may have even shed a tear.
  8. All you're saying is that in return for the $45 million salary relief on Price we got lesser prospects. That's pretty clear, but it has nothing to do with Betts.
  9. And taking Price probably factored into the quality of the prospects the Dodgers were willing to give up. But yeah, Betts was obviously going to the Dodgers with or without Price. Price was just a side piece.
  10. Not sure of the relevance of that either. All Denny said was you need to spend money to maintain the value of your house.
  11. Link please on the "necessary part". You're convinced they don't trade Betts unless Price is in the deal?
  12. The house analogy is a bit more apt, I think.
  13. $156 mill. He sat out 2020 and was not paid at all that year. Per FanGraphs his value for the years 2016-2019 was about $85 mill. There have been much worse busts.
  14. It wouldn't be as much as of an issue if we weren't racking up all these sub-.500 seasons. Another one this year would make 7 out of the last 13.
  15. Personally I think technology has peaked and is now going downhill.
  16. You think Ref suddenly and miraculously turned it around against RHPs at age 33? Does that actually make sense?
  17. You have some unique takes for sure.
  18. Which they probably will. It was just kind of interesting that the certainty of trading Jansen was leaked out.
  19. Sure, that's exactly what I said and a valid apples to apples comparison!
  20. Looks like they're doing some "upgrades". You know how that goes sometimes.
  21. Sure, just like Babe Ruth was "just one player". Why so much commotion about the Red Sox losing Ruth, huh?
  22. I'll take Price's WAR over Yoshida's and Grissom's, thank you very much! Plus Price did come through big in the 2018 postseason. We might have had a problem without him, yes...
  23. Texas had already heavily invested in the 2023 team though. They showed what "full throttle" actually means...
  24. Didn't care for the 3 division titles and the ring?
×
×
  • Create New...