Jays fans:
Hanley is still out, and the Sox offense has started the year much worse than expected. Hopefully Sanchez can take advantage. Fortunately, Wade Miley sucks.
Yes, 4 years is below market for Porcello. FanGraphs predicted he would get a 6 year deal as a free agent. This is one of the crucial points of this whole debate.
I think the Porcello debate has been boiled down to two basic points of disagreement.
1) The pro-Porcello-deal side says the increased AAV of $20 million is offset by the relatively short length of the deal.
2) The pro-Porcello-deal side says if he pitches as well as he did in 2014 for the 4 years of the deal, it will be a good value contract.
Yes and no. Porcello vs. Homer Bailey:
Porcello - higher AAV-yes, a new level for AAV.
Bailey - 6 years vs. 4 years for Porcello.
Bailey - $105 million vs. $82.5 million for Porcello.
Also (not that it means much, but you brought it up) Porcello is a number 1 on his own team now.
Man, WTF is up with the RISP. Didn't we suck all last year with RISP too? Sure is taking a long time to 'return to the norm', the old schooler in me says bitterly.
I've already agreed that Porcello is the first guy with his profile to make $20 million. In spite of that it's still a reasonable deal because of all the other arguments presented here, including the FanGraphs article projecting him for a 6 year $108 million free agent payday.
You've been using WAR a lot here, which is really good. But ERA is not a reliable measure, and you're mixing and matching new school with old school. Like I said, Porcello's WAR says he has been pitching better than a 4.3 ERA.
But you shouldn't be equating a 2.5 WAR with a 4.3 ERA. A 2.5 WAR indicates someone who has been pitching better than a 4.3 ERA would suggest. In Porcello's case some of that ERA with Detroit was attributable to bad defense.