Bellhorn04
-
Posts
54,899 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
76
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Bellhorn04
-
Let's go O. Might need a barrel of runs tonight.
-
Who needs Lackey when you can get Kelly and Craig for him?
-
Thanks Ben.
-
Sorry man, I thought it was a joke on your part. You're correct though, I am a little touchy lately, and I apologize. Part of it is I'm getting too old for this personal tax season crap.
-
VMart wasn't traded.
-
Ah yes, 'doubling down' with a non-factual complaint.
-
Lester and Lackey. Grrrr. That is all.
-
4/18 vs. Blue Jays: Patriot's Day
Bellhorn04 replied to Youk Of The Nation's topic in Mike Grace Memorial Game Thread Forum
Station, you make some pretty good observations. -
4/18 vs. Blue Jays: Patriot's Day
Bellhorn04 replied to Youk Of The Nation's topic in Mike Grace Memorial Game Thread Forum
Considering that Farrell was pinch-hitting for Shaw against lefties in earlier games...old Johnny is full of surprises! -
This makes as much sense as anything.
-
Chase Headley has sucked almost as bad as Panda.* *(Not meant as any sort of justification for signing Panda, merely a general observation.)
-
Young has K'd in 6 of his 8 tries against righties. Wow.
-
Something that's starting to concern me a bit is Mookie's lack of walks. He has 1 so far, and he didn't have a single one this spring. Not sure what's up with that.
-
You never get grouchy?
-
So much for prospects LOL
-
But this case is different, because they needed a certain amount of time for Vazquez to show he was game-ready.
-
Sorry, what I meant was that it's total speculation that Panda was not a Ben move.
-
Maybe they would have moved Hanigan in that case. We don't know. For some time now this Vazquez-Swihart situation has been brewing. They can't both be our #1 catcher.
-
It's quite possible, but you have to admit this is total speculation. We needed a third baseman and Panda was the top free agent third baseman - you have pointed out this yourself when defending the Panda signing.
-
But how do we know that they weren't planning from the start for Vazquez to be the #1 guy as soon as he looked ready? Vazquez looks great to me.
-
It was a funny post but I don't really buy it. Everybody prefers a winning team. And most complaints about the past two seasons were justified.
-
Kimbrel is basically a country hardball kind of guy, isn't he?
-
Also this may have been the plan with Vazquez all along, to install him as the #1 catcher as soon as all systems looked to be go with him.
-
The at-bat by Hanley in the first was huge. Great to see that alertness and hustle by him. And then of course for Shaw to step up and cash in two runs from it. The things that win ballgames...
-
The team looks like there's some real hustle and energy there. Maybe I should lay off Farrell...when I see a team playing hard like that it usually reflects well on the manager. Early days, though, early days...
