It's kind of funny to see so much talk about getting Moreland out of the 3 spot in a game in which had a hit and 2 walks. It was his 2-out, nobody on, single in the first that led to our 2 runs in that inning.
First of all, I don't get the L-R thing you have there. JD Martinez is a pretty good #4 hitter, no?
From what I have gathered, you basically put your 5th best hitter in the 3 spot. It looks like Cora is doing that with Moreland/Pearce in the 3 spot.
One of the Cold Hard Numbers is pitches seen per at-bat.
Numbers won't show all the subtleties and nuances, I agree with that. Numbers will never be able to track everything. But generally speaking, large samples mean more than small ones.
Nope, Bogey has a .929 OPS in the 5 spot and a .504 OPS in the 3 spot (SSS with only 31 PA's).
He's killing it in the 5 spot and I assume it's a very comfortable spot for him, so leave him there.
You also manage differently with a lead than you do in a tie. The Red Sox had a win probability of 50% going into the top of the 7th. Cleveland had a 78% win probability going into the bottom of the 7th.
I'd be lying if I said I wanted him to do well.
Just because when a guy you trade away does well, a lot of people never stop moaning and groaning and bashing the GM about it.
The thing about Kelly is, he hasn't ever really been consistently good for long stretches. Early this year it looked like he might finally be arriving, but he couldn't maintain it.
His fWAR places him as a pretty average reliever I would think.
But with the protection thing, the numbers just don't show hitters doing better in relation to how good the hitter behind them is - no matter whether it makes them feel better at the plate or not.
Theory is one thing and hard cold numbers are another.
A guy with an .825 OPS against over 2.5 months is not THAT hard to replace. I would think the 'throw stuff against the wall' approach we often hear about for bullpens would be applicable here.
But I think the 'rising fastball' basically falls into the category of an optical illusion, rather than a denial or misinterpretation of statistical evidence.
I think that was when he was president of the Rangers, and it turned out to be all talk by Nolan that the manager and coaches didn't want to have anything to do with.