Yeah, the rope-a-dope theory is pretty preposterous, I'm afraid. I could see one phantom DL, but 2 phantom DL's plus 4 games of fake 'ramping up the pitch count'? I don't think so.
Kelly yelled 'Let's go!' after his pitch, I think.
I've got no problem with the pitch CC threw. That was all within the code. But 'That was for you, bitch' is a little over the top, if you ask me.
It's conceivable there might be a market correction with relievers this offseason.
It happened to big-ticket DH types the last 2 years with Encarnacion and JDM.
Although some players with agents have taken alleged discounts over the years. Pedroia has an agent, for example.
The fact that you would rather have someone represent you than negotiate yourself doesn't necessarily mean you're after every last dollar.
Which is not to say Kimbrel won't be going after every last dollar when the time comes.
I see both sides.
I agree with those who say a good closer is important.
I agree with those who say $100 mill is too much for CK.
The real question, more than likely, is how DD is going to replace him.
I understand your position.
Personally I think Devers is a bit more likely to win a game for us with his bat than he is to lose one with his fielding, especially if you have a late inning replacement lined up.
But that could be wishful thinking on my part, admittedly.