Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

User Name

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    18,192

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by User Name

  1. User Name
    Rattle the pitcher and defense.
  2. User Name
    A trademark of Farrell-run teams.
  3. User Name
    Holt gon' give it to ya.
  4. User Name
    Is Price serious with this BS? Rodriguez sucks.
  5. User Name
    To think they're both still solid contributors. Baseball is funny that way.
  6. User Name
    Rhet was the other guy. I think the guys defending Beltre you, Kilo and I. Maybe ORS. I miss ORS.
  7. User Name
    Ok, it explains a lot.
  8. User Name
    Are you crazy? There was a contingent of people here all over Beltre. That TheMino guy and an old timer whose handle I can't remember.
  9. User Name
    Were you here during the Beltre hate period? That was a good one.
  10. User Name
    CP, I have an honest, non-snarky question for you. Are you new to baseball forums?
  11. User Name
    Well prepare to get your ass handed to you by the defenders of Farrell. Don't say I didn't warn ya.
  12. User Name
    Don't forget John Farrell.
  13. User Name
    In short, and to put this stupid issue to bed: People should be able to debate what they want, but the Talksox rules state (they should bring those back) that posts and topics specifically designed to antagonize or create flame wars are a no-no on site. I freely admit to creating controversy with the Papelbon posts, but those last a couple of posts and go away. This Cherington BS has been one giant buffet of antagonism for the last eight months. If you want to seriously debate the merits and problems of Cherington's tenure, go right at it, no one has a right to complain. If you want to antagonize another group of posters, make dumb black-and-white assertions and continue on a train of idiocy because neither side will budge on their viewpoint, cut that s*** out. It clutters the board, it's against the rules, and it's not interesting, current or funny.
  14. User Name
    Also, in the cruelest of ironies, he's not very good at detecting sarcasm/satire.
  15. User Name
    "This x 10000"
  16. User Name
    Unless it's something you don't like. You were the one calling me out earlier (for reasons I don't understand) for bringing out old stuff (what?) Be consistent.
  17. User Name
    The keyword is "debate". "Debating" and "baiting" or "beating a dead horse with the express intent of annoying a group of posters" is not the same thing.
  18. User Name
    No sir, you said it yourself: You're a bandwagon Mets fan.
  19. User Name
    That's like "cool" or "OK!" in spanish.
  20. User Name
    It's because Cherington is a polarizing subject. Y'all (and I'm including you) have a certain black/white way of looking at Cherington's tenure that illustrates the absolute worse in people. I don't understand why it's so hard to acknowledge he made mistakes (I'm looking at Kimmi) while also acknowledging he did some great things for this organization (I'm looking at you). If there was some level of objectivity regarding the subject, it wouldn't be such a sore sight whenever it's discussed. A lot of it is also written specifically to piss the other side off. Now I f*** around with the Papelbon s***, but that's between maybe 3,4 members and it dies down almost immediately. The Cherington idiocy has been going on for months. For the love of God, do like Elsa and let it go.
  21. User Name
    May I suggest a visit to the nearest psychiatric ward?
  22. User Name
    Yeah, I can. No matter how bad the Red Sox may be on a given year I am a Red Sox fan through and through. Honestly this explains a lot.
  23. User Name
    I'll get back to you with some ideas in a bit.
  24. User Name
    Don't tell me what I think. It's not about defending Cherington. Cherington, as a topic, is done. He's gone, se fue, it's over, goodbye.
  25. User Name
    I forgot about that: Sig bet, 2 out of 3: ERA, K's, and another stat or your choosing. Over/Under to be discussed.
×
×
  • Create New...