Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

User Name

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    18,192

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by User Name

  1. User Name

    The Cubs

    User Name replied to iortiz's topic in Other Baseball

    I don't believe in DeGrom honestly. Harvey would be a huge get.
  2. User Name
    Nope, and Sale isn't going anywhere anyway. Strasburg would be a terrible investment. He's been very inconsistent, has horrible mechanics (inverted W, and so does Sale actually) that have already lead to TJS , and is going to get stupid money/years from someone. The Red Sox would do well to pass on him.
  3. User Name
    You're massively overvaluing whtat Holt and Devers would bring back here.
  4. User Name
    I usually watch him on Saturdays. I'll have a gander tomorrow afternoon.
  5. User Name
    He's been below replacement level offensively every single year since 2011 against righties. If your OPS and wRC+ are below replacement level while you are playing a corner position, that is the definition of "actively doing harm". It was passable while he played CF, but it isn't while he's playing LF, and even less if he's being allowed to hit in game-defining situations. There are like seven layers of wrong there.
  6. User Name
    I'm not stupid, and I hate Panda. I've said many times I like calling things for what they are. I think some of his mistakes have been overblown, and I also think Hanley and Porcello will end up being good investments.
  7. User Name
    You're pretty good at exaggeration. We get it, you don't like the FO.
  8. User Name
    Dojji, you are employing a level of logical fallacy that makes me seriously doubt your cognitive abilities. Let me put it this way: He has had an OPS+ below league average, and has had OBP's below .300 against righties every year since 2011. He cannot hit righties. It is a fact. Deal with it.
  9. User Name
    If you know Holt is a borderline starter, what makes you think other teams don't see him the same way, and offered the Red Sox lower value than what they think he's worth? Other teams' front offices are not stupid.
  10. User Name
    Chris Young OPS vs righthanders: 2011: .694 2012: .707 2013: .614 2014: .720 2015: .585 He has sucked against righties since 2011, with his big "year" in 2014 resulting in a .720 OPS, (and looking like the actual outlier). There is a clear regression trend there. Check the numbers before you make the statements.
  11. User Name
    What are you talking about? Rasmus was a FA, they offered him a QO, he took it, and they made no effort to trade him afterwards. In fact, they were working on a multi-year deal before he accepted the QO.
  12. User Name
    Remy and DOB were talking about how Betances starts over 70% of his AB's with breaking balls, and Ortiz was sitting on that one.
  13. User Name
    Sarcasm isn't your strong suit. The point is that he can't hit righties, so he should see as little AB's against them as possible. Is that incorrect?
  14. User Name
    You know, we don't have to trade everyone just because we can. Holt is more valuable to the Red Sox than what they'd get back in a package. Even worse, they really need him. He's occupying a regular spot in LF, and he's the only guy who can currently spell XB. Marrero couldn't hit his way out of a party with all of Chris Brown's ex girlfriends.
  15. User Name
    It actually happened in reverse.
  16. User Name
    Tha yankeeess loooooseeee! Thaaaa yankeeessss loseeeee!
  17. User Name
    The MLB+ broadcast sucks
  18. User Name
    God I despise Brett Gardner.
  19. User Name
    The baseball Gods are in love with Owens tonight.
  20. User Name
    He's not living on luck, he's living on Holt. That's even better.
  21. User Name
    Hanley's hitting everything up-the-middle, to his pull side with power, or the other way with authority. Just looking great.
  22. User Name
    Haha f*** you, Castro!
  23. User Name
    If he can advance his fastball command, a good one. Otherwise, no future.
  24. User Name
    Owens is one of the most puzzling guys I have seen. Two legitimate swing-and-miss pitches (breaking ball, changeup) he can throw for strikes consistently, yet he can't command his fastball. That makes no sense.
  25. User Name
    Really Owens?
×
×
  • Create New...