Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

User Name

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    18,192

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by User Name

  1. User Name
    Pointing out that Buchholz f***ing sucks/gets injured every f***ing year and they should have had a backup plan for the inevitable is not whining. What you are doing about Price three months into his contract is whining. Pot, meet kettle.
  2. User Name
    Rushing Benintendi's timeline to fill a short-term need is anything but reasonable.
  3. User Name
    Sure, but if it quacks like a duck, and acts like a duck.
  4. User Name
    Among others actually.
  5. User Name
    It's not that they "didn't get to take" Buchholz. It's that they chose Miley over him. The context is different.
  6. User Name
    I can easily look up a post from not even a month ago where you agreed with the notion that the pitchers involved were Miley-Buch, but the Mariners chose Miley. Saying otherwise now is flip flopping.
  7. User Name
    I thoroughly dislike the Golden State Warriors basketball establishment. So yes, I am indeed in a heightened state of anger and agitation, brethren.
  8. User Name
    De La Rosa's underlying peripherals are terrible. He curiosly has a reverse split too. His ERA is like 7 runs higher outside of Coors.
  9. User Name
    This comment explains quite clearly to the rest of us that you did, in fact, play with barbies.
  10. User Name
    Kind of a flip-flopper aren't you?
  11. User Name
    If they wanted Buchholz, he would realistically be with the M's right now.
  12. User Name
    TBSB, you're either not as smart as you think, or terrible a trolling. Either way, stick to your day job.
  13. User Name
    That's not what I'm hinting at though. I'm confirming that, at the very least, the M's didn't want him.
  14. User Name
    And it was reported widely (we've had this discussion before) that the Mariners were offered one of Miley/Buchholz in the deal. They chose Miley.
  15. User Name
    Why do you always make those stupid statements? Stick to the discussion without being a douchey smartass. Leave the sass to the ladies.
  16. User Name
    Cameron is a great baseball writer and analytics expert, but he's A) Not a talent evaluator, B ) Doesn't have a more enlightened idea regarding Benintendi's ETA than any of us do, because projected timelines are just that: Projections. He's had just a couple AA at-bats. Pump the brakes on the Benintendi train.
  17. User Name
    Why does Farrell keep using Kimbrel stupidly? Why?
  18. User Name
    You are spouting nonsense. One article isn't the be-all and end-all of baseball analysis.
  19. User Name
    Dat fred reference.
  20. User Name
    Stop making dumb excuses. The ump was bad, full stop.
  21. User Name
    It would be! I bungled that up pretty good.
  22. User Name
    Dropping 21 to the Angels, and spotting 4-spots to the other team in the first inning several other times 06/10-07/1? Not really.
  23. User Name
    Exactly the point. As I told Hugh before, they're just your opinions. I just don't see it. From all indications, having Vasquez be the primary catcher was the plan all along. Then again, that's just my opinion.
  24. User Name
    Vasquez was the starting catcher, he gets injured. Swihart gets pressed into duty and struggles defensively. Vasquez comes back from surgery, and Swihart is clearly not ready defensively at the most important position in the diamond. What were they supposed to do?
  25. User Name
    Pedroia could hit 1.000/1.000/1.000 with a HR every AB and this team still wouldn't win consistently with the pitching problems it has.
×
×
  • Create New...