Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account
  • Red Sox News & Analysis

    A Plea For The Red Sox To Sign Juan Soto


    Maddie Landis

    It's great to look for surplus value, to be strategic, and to sign players who suit your roster needs. But you know what else is great? Getting the best player on the market.

    Image courtesy of © Gregory Fisher-Imagn Images

    Red Sox Video

     “It’s expensive to sign baseball players,” John Henry once said, much to the chagrin of Red Sox fans. Henry’s statement rings true. Free agent contract values are increasing each year. Last offseason, Shohei Ohtani signed a 10-year, $700-million contract to play for the Los Angeles Dodgers, which broke the previous record for the most expensive professional sports contract. Previously, Mike Trout’s 12-year, $426.5-million extension was the largest contract in baseball. 

    AD_4nXdhj_oI-y-RRk8Wp-geqBwm7di40HM09uWA48A3S2RT0zxjw8Nh9nRvDh5xiMK9Kcoj2CzhWczVBMhQAvcd2fzB7-QRfOZRdC24r0p2_lCYzukr3hsuhXSKkptCB4F4QXuW7oosyDAxqnN9FbwcxrGqDpuL?key=iWyCQ8moxyvefOTTuGVrdMPw

    Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the free agent market dipped following the 2020 season. Free agents affected by the shortened pandemic season “only” inked $1.36 billion total in contracts. However, since then, the total value of free-agent contracts has risen steadily. Some players, arguably, aren’t worth their gargantuan contracts. Others are. 

    Twenty-six-year-old future Hall of Famers like Juan Soto seldom enters free agency. The Athletic projects that Soto will garner a 12-year, $540-million contract. He’s worth every penny, and the Red Sox must pursue him. 

    Sure, money is paramount to Soto, but winning comes in at a close second. It’s important to point out that the Red Sox are behemoths in recent World Series history. Since 2004, they have a 16-3 record in the World Series. On the other hand, the Yankees possess a 5-6 record. Sniping the Yankees' primary offseason target is a dub by itself.

    The Yankees' core is not sustainable. The World Series accentuated their roster construction flaws, from their shoddy defense to their inefficiency on the basepaths. Moreover, the Yankees have the second-oldest roster in the league at an average age of 29.3. Their roster is constrained by several aging superstars in the middle of expensive, long-term contracts. Gerrit Cole (34), Carlos Rodón (31), and Giancarlo Stanton (34) are being paid at least $25 million per year until 2027 or 2028. Aaron Judge has about $280 million remaining on his contract.

    As I mentioned earlier, Juan Soto is 26 years old. He’s two years younger than Rafael Devers, Jarren Duran, Tanner Houck, Kutter Crawford, and Garrett Whitlock. Soto has shown that his floor is an All-Star caliber player in six MLB seasons. His ceiling is a perennial top-10 MVP candidate and Silver Slugger winner.

    Soto would be “just another guy” in the crowded dugouts of the Yankees or Dodgers clubhouse, but he could be the star of the Red Sox. The Red Sox have a young homegrown core. Any egregious long-term contracts don’t saddle the organization. They have a strong farm system. Sustainable contention looms over the horizon, but they need someone to push them over from mediocrity. 

    Over the past couple of seasons, it seems like the Red Sox are banking on the Big Four to impact the major-league roster immediately. Putting all their eggs in one basket is a risky move. At the very least, one of the Big Four will break out in the majors. Allocating some, not all, of their resources toward a generational talent provides them with a backup plan and insurance in case any of their prospects fail to perform in the majors. 

    Opponents argue, “But Soto is a left-handed hitter! The team has too many lefties!” The roster is notably lefty-heavy, but it’s not like the Red Sox lefties can’t hit against left-handed pitching. Triston Casas and Rafael Devers hold 114 and 98 wRC+ career splits against southpaws.

    Soto is frequently likened to Ted Williams for a reason. He has no trouble hitting the ball, regardless of a pitcher’s handedness. Look at his career splits against left-handed pitching. 

    Career

    BA

    OBP

    SLG

    RBI

    HR

    K%

    wRC+

    vs LHP

    .268

    .383

    .475

    191

    56

    18.0

    135

    Wouldn't you like to see the second coming of Ted Williams spend the rest of his career in Fenway Park? Slotting Soto into the lineup would exacerbate the lefty-dominant nature of the lineup, but his career splits mark a substantial improvement over Ceddanne Rafaela (62 wRC+), Masataka Yoshida (84 wRC+), and Jarren Duran (88 wRC+).

    It's also important to remember that injuries were part of the reason the lineup was so lefty-heavy. The holes Vaughn Grissom and Trevor Story left in the infield were filled by left-handed batters David Hamilton, Dom Smith, and Enmanuel Valdez , creating a false narrative that the lineup is too reliant on left-handed batters. It should look a little more balanced next year with (fingers crossed) healthy seasons from Trevor Story and Vaughn Grissom. 

    Assuming Wilyer Abreu is traded, imagine this lineup:

    1. CF Jarren Duran (L)
    2. LF Juan Soto (L)
    3. 3B Rafael Devers (L)
    4. 1B Triston Casas (L)
    5. SS Trevor Story (R)
    6. DH Masataka Yoshida (L)
    7. C Connor Wong (R)
    8. RF Ceddanne Rafaela (R)
    9. 2B Vaughn Grissom (R)

    Beautiful, no? 

    Along with Triston Casas and Masataka Yoshida, Soto will exasperate opposing pitchers, driving pitch counts up and opposing managers insane.

    Soto could provide some cushion for Raffy and alleviate him from the burden/expectation of carrying the team’s offense. Despite being the team’s highest-paid player and the face of the franchise, Devers is notably reserved and shies away from the media. He’s not an outspoken leader, preferring to stay quiet and let his work speak for itself. This is fine, but the Boston media is intense and passionate. Soto is a showy performer and doesn’t shy away from the spotlight. By taking center stage in the organization, he would reduce pressure from the media. 

    Lefties with opposite field power can take advantage of the Green Monster and Soto is no exception. He pulled the ball more frequently while playing in Yankee Stadium last year, but he's capable of spraying the ball all over the field.

    AD_4nXerD0VtsBEf9HdeK6W6p22V9n6uCZw7lmBYVBCHKk4oZBVaSwS7y5_QJEE5kS4nz2FqDXJbb95JchkCeOKngme10BpJGaMrDaVj-bp1yq_GkYXeHPe3yIow00j7QNMMIjKcB9IZJ-2-VBSfoQvkQvFbYkbL?key=iWyCQ8moxyvefOTTuGVrdMPw

    Soto would pepper Lansdowne Street with home runs. He could easily hit 50+ home runs playing 81 games at Fenway each year. Heck, he might surpass David Ortiz’s single-season record of 54 home runs.

    Speaking of which, like David Ortiz, Soto is Dominican. He plays for the Dominican World Baseball team. The Red Sox have a strong history of Dominican baseball stars. Pedro Martinez, David Ortiz, and Manny Ramirez’s contributions to the 2004 Red Sox will never be forgotten. This past spring, the organization recently updated its Dominican Academy and played an exhibition series in Santo Domingo (Soto’s hometown). Juan Soto grew up idolizing Manny, Pedro, and Big Papi. Why not join Rafael Devers and Brayan Bello to form a new Dominican trio?

    Smart investments matter for sustainable contention. You can’t put a brand-new 2025 Ferrari 812 GTS engine in a 1995 PT Cruiser and expect the car to run smoothly. You also can’t keep “fixing” glaring holes with Band-Aids and expect a winning product on the field. The Red Sox indicated they’ll stop cosplaying as a small market team and are ready to spend. Simply spending for the sake of spending isn’t sustainable. They must be cognizant of where they're allocating their resources. 

    That said, the Red Sox have a list of things that need fixing in the offseason. Their outfield was a bright spot on the team and doesn’t necessarily need any additional help.  However, landing a generational talent like Soto should take precedence over their other issues, and the Red Sox must be proactive. Pursue Soto and let the rest of the roster sort itself out.

    Follow Talk Sox For Boston Red Sox News & Analysis

    Recent Red Sox Articles

    Recent Red Sox Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    3 hours ago, dgalehouse said:

    We need a dose of sanity here. I'm all for spending to put together a winning team, but this is getting ridiculous . Crazy money. Soto is getting way too much hype. He is very good, but Mookie is a better all around player. Soto is a good hitter, albeit a career .285 batting average. He walks a lot. Hooray. Let's pay him 3/4 billion bucks because he walks a lot. He has good, but not exceptional power. Never led the league in home runs. He is a mediocre defender. Not a big base stealer. While I would like to see him on the Sox, this hysteria is not warranted. 

    Not exceptional power?

    The list of players with 200 home runs before their age 26 season:

    1. Alex Rodriguez

    2. Jimmie Fox

    3 Eddie Matthew’s

    4. Mel Ott

    5. Mickey Mantle

    6. Frank Robinson

    7. Mike Trout

    8. Albert Pujols

    9.  Juan Soto

    Thats it.  In all of MLB history.  Just those 9. 

    I’d consider that to be exceptional power…

     

     

    29 minutes ago, notin said:

    Not exceptional power?

    The list of players with 200 home runs before their age 26 season:

    1. Alex Rodriguez

    2. Jimmie Fox

    3 Eddie Matthew’s

    4. Mel Ott

    5. Mickey Mantle

    6. Frank Robinson

    7. Mike Trout

    8. Albert Pujols

    9.  Juan Soto

    Thats it.  In all of MLB history.  Just those 9. 

    I’d consider that to be exceptional power…

     

     

    Okay. Call it exceptional if you want. His season high was 41 with the Stadium short porch.  He has played seven seasons at age 26. Not too many guys have done that.  But my point remains: People have gone way overboard on him. 

    44 minutes ago, notin said:

    Not exceptional power?

    The list of players with 200 home runs before their age 26 season:

    1. Alex Rodriguez

    2. Jimmie Fox

    3 Eddie Matthew’s

    4. Mel Ott

    5. Mickey Mantle

    6. Frank Robinson

    7. Mike Trout

    8. Albert Pujols

    9.  Juan Soto

    Thats it.  In all of MLB history.  Just those 9. 

    I’d consider that to be exceptional power…

     

     

    that's some nice company.

    3 hours ago, Duran Is The Man said:

    what does it meant to you? to me, it means he's screwing around when he needs to be signing players. we need starting pitching and, to date, not only have we not signed a starter, we're down one with the loss of Nick. the Dodgers signed Snell and will probably sign Sasaki. Henry, as usual, will sign some retread and call it good.

    It means to me, that no one GM ever gets all the prizes.

    That does not excuse us missing out on all of them. 

    I've laid down what I think is the minimum we need to do to feel like we can be relevant, again, and hope we can go a step or two above that suggestion. With 5-10 other teams in on the same guys we want, it's not easy.

    Why should we think JH can outbid other equally rich owners?

    Here is my minimum list:

    1 from Fried or Burnes

    1 from Bregman, Teoscar, Scott, Flaherty or Eovaldi

    Carson Kelly or the like.

    One step better: 2 from the second group or 1 plus Hoffman, Estevez, Santander or Walker/Alfonso

    or same as minimum, but trade for Crochet, Lopez or someone similar.

    Two steps better:  1 from Fried, Burnes and 1 from Bregman & Scott. A trade for someone like Crochet, plus Scott or Hoffman. (This ain't happening.)

    15 minutes ago, moonslav59 said:

    It means to me, that no one GM ever gets all the prizes.

    That does not excuse us missing out on all of them. 

    I've laid down what I think is the minimum we need to do to feel like we can be relevant, again, and hope we can go a step or two above that suggestion. With 5-10 other teams in on the same guys we want, it's not easy.

    Why should we think JH can outbid other equally rich owners?

    Here is my minimum list:

    1 from Fried or Burnes

    1 from Bregman, Teoscar, Scott, Flaherty or Eovaldi

    Carson Kelly or the like.

    One step better: 2 from the second group or 1 plus Hoffman, Estevez, Santander or Walker/Alfonso

    or same as minimum, but trade for Crochet, Lopez or someone similar.

    Two steps better:  1 from Fried, Burnes and 1 from Bregman & Scott. A trade for someone like Crochet, plus Scott or Hoffman. (This ain't happening.)

    MLBTR  is saying we are not really in on Crochet

    16 minutes ago, Randy Red Sox said:

    MLBTR  is saying we are not really in on Crochet

    Just this evening...

    MLBNetwork’s Jon Morosi reported this evening that a Crochet deal coming together during the Winter Meetings this week is “increasingly possible.” What’s more, Morosi suggests that the Red Sox are “more willing” to listen on top shortstop prospect Marcelo Mayer than previously believed and could become a more significant factor in Crochet’s trade market if they make him available in trade talks with the White Sox.

    19 minutes ago, moonslav59 said:

    Just this evening...

    MLBNetwork’s Jon Morosi reported this evening that a Crochet deal coming together during the Winter Meetings this week is “increasingly possible.” What’s more, Morosi suggests that the Red Sox are “more willing” to listen on top shortstop prospect Marcelo Mayer than previously believed and could become a more significant factor in Crochet’s trade market if they make him available in trade talks with the White Sox.

    no way do i include Mayer in that deal

    57 minutes ago, Randy Red Sox said:

    no way do i include Mayer in that deal

    Maybe, if we get an extension as part of the deal. (I can't remember when that last happened.)

    I'm kinda losing my love for Mayer, but it does seem like an overpay for 2 years of guy who has very few seasons of showing he can pitch very well over many innings.

    I do think keeping Anthony and Campbell are more important, and with Wong looking crappy on D, I think we need to keep Teel.

    Makes you wonder what someone like Mookie would get today if he reached free agency at the age of 26.  Probably over 750 million.  

    As disappointed as I am, and I am, it's easy to see that money and say oh well I don't want to pay that.

    But that's where the market is going.  Baseball player inflation is high, about 11% the past decade.  That and paying for youth adds a premium as well.  Lets take Mookie as an example. 

    1.11^5=1.68 That's the inflation adjustment from 2025 to 2020.  Take Mookies 365*1.68 and you get $613 million dollars.  But that was for 12 not 15 years.  Mookies contract today, adjusting for inflation and years would be $766 million dollars. 

    I'm not saying we made the wrong decision not outbidding the Mets, but MY MAIN POINT here is this is where the cost for premium players as gone. I get betting on the wrong guy can burn a hole in your roster, but at some point if you're a billionaire owner you have to place your bets somewhere.  

    John Henry is like....playing the table minimum at the high roller table.  

    31 minutes ago, Hugh2 said:

    Makes you wonder what someone like Mookie would get today if he reached free agency at the age of 26.  Probably over 750 million.  

    As disappointed as I am, and I am, it's easy to see that money and say oh well I don't want to pay that.

    But that's where the market is going.  Baseball player inflation is high, about 11% the past decade.  That and paying for youth adds a premium as well.  Lets take Mookie as an example. 

    1.11^5=1.68 That's the inflation adjustment from 2025 to 2020.  Take Mookies 365*1.68 and you get $613 million dollars.  But that was for 12 not 15 years.  Mookies contract today, adjusting for inflation and years would be $766 million dollars.

    But is that inflation rate across the board for player salaries, or just for the top contracts?

    4 minutes ago, Bellhorn04 said:

    But is that inflation rate across the board for player salaries, or just for the top contracts?

    This deal makes the Ohtani deal look much better, and the Betts deal look like the steal of the decade.

    I do not see a major increase in secondary contracts, though. Most are coming in slightly higher than MLBTR's projected amounts.

    Snell got $30M more than projected, but I count him as a first tier signing. Adames got an extra year, but the money was close. ($182M/7 vs projected $160M/6- more money/less AAV)

    The secondary signings, so far: Actual Contract/ MLBTR Estimate

    $63M/3--$60M/3 Kikuchi

    $67M/3--$51M/3 Severino (significantly more)

    $49.5/3--$42M/3 O'Neall

    $38M/3--$30M/3 Holmes

    $29M/2--$25M/2 Boyd

    $34M/3--$22M/2 Montas (significantly more)

    $20M/2--$8.5M/1 D Jansen (LESS)

    $18M/2--$17M/1 Conforto (significantly more AAV)

    $13.5M/2--$15M/2 Higgy

    $26M/2--$12M/1 Bieber (significantly more)

    Third Tier: (No estimate from MLBTR)

    $22M/2 Treinen

    $10.75M/1 Chapman

    $12M/2 d'Arnaud

    $8.5M/1 G Sanchez

    46 minutes ago, Bellhorn04 said:

    But is that inflation rate across the board for player salaries, or just for the top contracts?

    Interesting point, I also wonder how that inflation rate holds going back further?  I'd suspect the rate of inlfation comes down but is still much higher than the national average. 

    Shane Victorino would probably get $150 million 5 years in this market.  

    Bregman is probably going to get more than that, probably closer to Adames money.  Not comparing any of those players. 

    31 minutes ago, moonslav59 said:

    This deal makes the Ohtani deal look much better, and the Betts deal look like the steal of the decade.

    I do not see a major increase in secondary contracts, though. Most are coming in slightly higher than MLBTR's projected amounts.

    Snell got $30M more than projected, but I count him as a first tier signing. Adames got an extra year, but the money was close. ($182M/7 vs projected $160M/6- more money/less AAV)

    The secondary signings, so far: Actual Contract/ MLBTR Estimate

    $63M/3--$60M/3 Kikuchi

    $67M/3--$51M/3 Severino (significantly more)

    $49.5/3--$42M/3 O'Neall

    $38M/3--$30M/3 Holmes

    $29M/2--$25M/2 Boyd

    $34M/3--$22M/2 Montas (significantly more)

    $20M/2--$8.5M/1 D Jansen (LESS)

    $18M/2--$17M/1 Conforto (significantly more AAV)

    $13.5M/2--$15M/2 Higgy

    $26M/2--$12M/1 Bieber (significantly more)

    Third Tier: (No estimate from MLBTR)

    $22M/2 Treinen

    $10.75M/1 Chapman

    $12M/2 d'Arnaud

    $8.5M/1 G Sanchez

    For reasons I've already stated, the Betts deal is in a sense comparable to Sotos deal.  If you pay him for 3 more years accounting for age and add in the inflation rate the past 5 years you get over 700 million. 

    Here's the reality.  If Soto is still playing like an MVP 5 years from now no one is going to be calling this a bad contract. 

    I suspect in my lifetime I'm going to see all stars regularly being paid $100 million dollars a year. 

    15 hours ago, dgalehouse said:

    Okay. Call it exceptional if you want. His season high was 41 with the Stadium short porch.  He has played seven seasons at age 26. Not too many guys have done that.  But my point remains: People have gone way overboard on him. 

    It’s gone very overboard.  He will likely make more this year than the Tampa Rays.
     

    But Soto is inarguably among the best offensive players in the game today, and got there at a ridiculously young age.  That he played 6 seasons before turning 26 is not a mere write-off as to how he’s already putting up numbers with the games all time greats; it’s a crazy impressive accomplishment to even be in that position.  He’s most definitely on a path to Cooperstown.  
     

    I would have loved to get him in Boston, but I do understand not outbidding the Mets here.  Hopefully the Sox retain this newfound commitment to spending with the money no longer earmarked for Soto…

    31 minutes ago, notin said:

    It’s gone very overboard.  He will likely make more this year than the Tampa Rays.

    Is that on the overall FA market or on the Rays? The first CBT line will be up to about 350M by the time Soto's deal is done. Will the Rays and other small market teams still be under 100M at that point? If so, that's the real embarrassment considering the amount of money the small market teams are handed out from large market teams. 

    Will the baseball economy crash at some point, have a slowdown or would we at least see more movement out of underperforming markets?  

    1 hour ago, notin said:

    It’s gone very overboard.  He will likely make more this year than the Tampa Rays.
     

    But Soto is inarguably among the best offensive players in the game today, and got there at a ridiculously young age.  That he played 6 seasons before turning 26 is not a mere write-off as to how he’s already putting up numbers with the games all time greats; it’s a crazy impressive accomplishment to even be in that position.  He’s most definitely on a path to Cooperstown.  
     

    I would have loved to get him in Boston, but I do understand not outbidding the Mets here.  Hopefully the Sox retain this newfound commitment to spending with the money no longer earmarked for Soto…

    With the $75M signing bonus counted in, Soto will make more than several teams in 2025.

    17 minutes ago, mvp 78 said:

    It's not a Soto problem. It's an ownership problem of small market teams. 

    The thing is, only one team gets to sign Soto. Even if all owners spent a lot, there would always be have and have nots, and contract prices would go up, even more.

    It seems one way to "fix" it is to have a cap and a hard floor: like maybe $160M to $240M, with the floor always being at least 66.6% of the cap. Maybe have situations where going over the cap is allowed, in certain situations.

    The penalty system is not working.

    According to spotrac, half the teams in MLB were under $148M (also under $170M.)

    5 teams were between $62M and $99M. Another 5 were between $100M and $119M.

    On the top side:

    NYY & NYM $308M to $314M (with deferred money keeping LAD lower.)

    HOU, PHI, LAD between $240M and $255M

    ATL, CHC, TEX & TOR: $218M to $237M

    SFG & BOS $188-202M

    STL, AZ, LAA & SDP $170M to $175M

    25 minutes ago, moonslav59 said:

    The thing is, only one team gets to sign Soto. Even if all owners spent a lot, there would always be have and have nots, and contract prices would go up, even more.

    It seems one way to "fix" it is to have a cap and a hard floor: like maybe $160M to $240M, with the floor always being at least 66.6% of the cap. Maybe have situations where going over the cap is allowed, in certain situations.

    The penalty system is not working.

    Right now, they can't even get to 100M for a floor. Setting a floor at 50% of the first CBT seems to make sense, but owners won't go for it unfortunately. Hard to fit in a hard cap as MLBPA doesn't want one. We're cursed to continue on in this doomed world they've created. 

    3 minutes ago, mvp 78 said:

    Right now, they can't even get to 100M for a floor. Setting a floor at 50% of the first CBT seems to make sense, but owners won't go for it unfortunately. Hard to fit in a hard cap as MLBPA doesn't want one. We're cursed to continue on in this doomed world they've created. 

    Yes, 50% is likely impossible to get an agreement on.

    Just some sort of cap might be impossible, too.

    26 minutes ago, mvp 78 said:

    Right now, they can't even get to 100M for a floor. Setting a floor at 50% of the first CBT seems to make sense, but owners won't go for it unfortunately. Hard to fit in a hard cap as MLBPA doesn't want one. We're cursed to continue on in this doomed world they've created. 

    Because fans dont get a seat at the table for MLBPA negotiations.

    If the small market teams are happy to collect a check from the big spenders, and the big spenders are happy to write that check, and the players are happy - then its working for all parties negotiating, even if its frustrating for us.  But thats kind of on our owners

    30 minutes ago, drewski6 said:

    Because fans dont get a seat at the table for MLBPA negotiations.

    If the small market teams are happy to collect a check from the big spenders, and the big spenders are happy to write that check, and the players are happy - then its working for all parties negotiating, even if its frustrating for us.  But thats kind of on our owners

    Personally, I don't care what players are being paid. It's very abstract to me. Worrying about it really obscures the frustration with Henry simply not paying the right players since 2018. 

    2 minutes ago, mvp 78 said:

    Personally, I don't care what players are being paid. It's very abstract to me. Worrying about it really obscures the frustration with Henry simply not paying the right players since 2018. 

    Agree. I think our problem has mostly been our decision making vs disadvantages with the financial structure.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...