Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Thanks, but at the same time that's a pretty low bar! :D :D

 

That’s why I added the line about summing it better than I was capable of...

  • Replies 318
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Actually wasn't referring to you at all!

I respect your perspectives, & always have.

 

LOL :0

 

Granted, it was a total throwaway line.... it just felt right with the totality of the discussion. An obligatory swipe at the generation that can school us on many a thing....

 

Again, LOL :0

 

I just enjoy triggering them because they're so much god dambed smarter.

 

Anyway.... All my other points stand! Not because I'm smart, I'm just almost always right.

 

;)

I get it. Thanks for the clarification. Now that you have clarified that the post wasn't directed at me, the posters who complimented your post, will probably delete their complimentary posts.
Posted
well, give me some names, bright eyes.

 

I think you are missing point.

 

It is not the trades we made, it is the fact that we made the trades.

 

We drained the minor league system because Henry switched gear and went bipolar on us.

Posted
N I am on record for not trading Betts unless or until the Sox were out of contention this year. I am on record on not giving up their best baseball asset unless they got the bone fide pitching prospects or starting pitching they needed if they were going to make a trade prior to the trading deadline. I am against giving up the 2020 season without competing. That is what I am on the record for. All the rest is just quiters rationalizing a bad deal by a new GM who got schooled by his mentor and former boss.

 

you forget one simple fact in all these words you typed. the owner of the team mandated a LT reset and you (the GM) needed to shed $20MM from the payroll. we can pretend that isn't a fact if you want. then your words might....might...have meaning......

Posted (edited)
I don't think you have ever made a post I agree with more. This is just flat out spot on IMO. Better summary than I am capable of...

 

JFC. i feel like the world may end now.

FTR - i also think S5's post was pretty freaking perfect.

Edited by Slasher9
Posted
When Bloom was introduced they had a conference call with season ticket holders. Kennedy was also present. The ticket renewal period was still open. Bloom was asked directly about Betts, and after what has since transpired, it looks very much like he just lied to us with the nodding approval of top brass. He was also very optimistic about fielding a competitive squad in 2020. People can call it what they want but, based on the statements at that meeting, I was convinced that Betts would not be traded for financial reasons and that Bloom would have to be overwhelmed to trade Betts. I feel that he was very misleading.

 

A700 - i feel bad for you on this one as you have been a season ticket holder. but even you have to admit you saw the writing on the wall after the JH "mandate" for the 2020 season as you did not renew your season ticket plan. i agree with you the Red Sox should NOT have raised a single ticket price this offseason. to me that is the biggest mistake they have done that should not have happened. now that they have traded #50 they should send every season ticket holder a $50 food/drink voucher for every seat they have a season ticket for....

Posted

Henry slashing payroll and increasing ticket prices for a mediocre team shows that he's no longer in touch with reality. (That's really been in question since his offseason ranting in '11-'12 to me.)

 

I understand the need to get under the lux tax. I don't agree with how they went about it and all the double speak this offseason. I give him all the credit in the world for 04, 07, 13 and 18, but he can be damn embarrassing sometimes.

Posted
Henry slashing payroll and increasing ticket prices for a mediocre team shows that he's no longer in touch with reality. (That's really been in question since his offseason ranting in '11-'12 to me.)

 

I understand the need to get under the lux tax. I don't agree with how they went about it and all the double speak this offseason. I give him all the credit in the world for 04, 07, 13 and 18, but he can be damn embarrassing sometimes.

 

So what do you think they should have told the public about their real plans this offseason?

Posted
So what do you think they should have told the public about their real plans this offseason?

 

sometimes silence is golden. the silence and/or the bad news about mookie being traded is easier to swallow if ticket prices are not raised.

to me DD saying "everyone is healthy" and within a week 4 players going under the knife is far more egregious......

Posted
So what do you think they should have told the public about their real plans this offseason?

 

Nothing.

 

Instead, they went with "we're cutting back payroll to get under luxury tax." Later on "we are going to compete this year, we don't have to cut payroll, it's not our intention." Of course they went with the "we're going to compete" as it got closer and closer to tickets going on sale. Then, they waited until well after tickets went on sale to the general public before they went through with the trade. I believe they intentionally held off on the trade until they were satisfied with ticket sales. Is that a conspiracy theory? Sure, but I believe it.

Posted
sometimes silence is golden. the silence and/or the bad news about mookie being traded is easier to swallow if ticket prices are not raised.

to me DD saying "everyone is healthy" and within a week 4 players going under the knife is far more egregious......

Universe to Red Sox Nation the FO lies!

Posted
Nothing.

 

Instead, they went with "we're cutting back payroll to get under luxury tax." Later on "we are going to compete this year, we don't have to cut payroll, it's not our intention." Of course they went with the "we're going to compete" as it got closer and closer to tickets going on sale. Then, they waited until well after tickets went on sale to the general public before they went through with the trade. I believe they intentionally held off on the trade until they were satisfied with ticket sales. Is that a conspiracy theory? Sure, but I believe it.

 

 

Maybe that message was meant for other GMs to interpret “Not giving away Mookie.”

Posted
sometimes silence is golden. the silence and/or the bad news about mookie being traded is easier to swallow if ticket prices are not raised.

to me DD saying "everyone is healthy" and within a week 4 players going under the knife is far more egregious......

 

But the media and fans don't accept silence either. There was a lot of complaining that the Sox didn't really explain why they fired DD.

 

The whole mess started with Shaughnessy asking Henry point blank back in September about whether they intended to re-set the tax, or words to that effect.

Posted
But the media and fans don't accept silence either. There was a lot of complaining that the Sox didn't really explain why they fired DD.

 

The whole mess started with Shaughnessy asking Henry point blank back in September about whether they intended to re-set the tax, or words to that effect.

 

oh i agree. the media will always try and get someone to say something. the FO (especially the owner) needs to take a page out of the BB playbook. say words that dont mean anything or say nothing at all. i dont blame shaughnessy one bit. that was a great get by him....

Posted
Nothing.

 

Nothing doesn't work. As soon as they hire Bloom, and don't spend any money on free agents, the media would have a pile of stories about how they were obviously cutting payroll to re-set.

Posted
oh i agree. the media will always try and get someone to say something. the FO (especially the owner) needs to take a page out of the BB playbook. say words that dont mean anything or say nothing at all.

 

Yeah, like 'coach's decision' on Malcolm Butler not playing in SB. That really put that to rest!

Posted
Yeah, like 'coach's decision' on Malcolm Butler not playing in SB. That really put that to rest!

 

dammit. that one is my hot button. i will never forgive him for that one. but the point remains...we still havent received an answer from ANYONE on that one. not from the player, not from the owner, the HC, or any of the other coaching staff. it is still all just guesses and the question doesnt even get asked anymore.....

Posted
You can not blame the media for being the media. Besides the Red Sox did not become the brand that has become without publicity.

 

That's true.

 

The fans are the ones who have the option of whether to be reasonable or not.

Posted
Maybe that message was meant for other GMs to interpret “Not giving away Mookie.”

 

Couldn't that be done with a phone call?

Posted
oh i agree. the media will always try and get someone to say something. the FO (especially the owner) needs to take a page out of the BB playbook. say words that dont mean anything or say nothing at all. i dont blame shaughnessy one bit. that was a great get by him....

 

He works for the paper owned by Henry. This wasn't an accident.

Posted
Nothing doesn't work. As soon as they hire Bloom, and don't spend any money on free agents, the media would have a pile of stories about how they were obviously cutting payroll to re-set.

 

So? That has nothing to do with how Henry directly treated his ticket holders.

Posted
dammit. that one is my hot button. i will never forgive him for that one. but the point remains...we still havent received an answer from ANYONE on that one. not from the player, not from the owner, the HC, or any of the other coaching staff. it is still all just guesses and the question doesnt even get asked anymore.....

 

Malcolm has kinda sucked since leaving the Pats.

Posted
So? That has nothing to do with how Henry directly treated his ticket holders.

 

How's he supposed to treat the ticket holders exactly?

Posted
How's he supposed to treat the ticket holders exactly?

 

Don't say "we're cutting payroll" and then right before ticket sales begin state "I didn't really mean that, it's not our intention to cut payroll, we're going to compete."

 

That doesn't sound s***** to you?

Posted
Don't say "we're cutting payroll" and then right before ticket sales begin state "I didn't really mean that, it's not our intention to cut payroll, we're going to compete."

 

That doesn't sound s***** to you?

 

He didn't say it exactly that way.

 

When he said we're cutting payroll in September, that was probably the most honest statement. And he got ridiculed for it, because supposedly it put the team at a serious disadvantage in negotiations.

 

Subsequent statements were all pretty ambiguous. The message, as such, was that the primarily goal wasn't cutting payroll but being competitive. And they tried to explain that the competitive part included the future.

 

It was a mess, I'm not denying that. I just don't think any particular approach would have gone over well. Red Sox fans in general don't like cutting payroll or trading a Mookie Betts no matter how you dress it up.

Posted
Malcolm has kinda sucked since leaving the Pats.

 

yes, but i believe without doubt if he played in that super bowl vs the Eagles we would have won. we would have stopped a couple of those 3rd and long plays....nick freakin foles.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...