Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Community Moderator
Posted
Of course he is, now that his options have dwindled to the point where only the Red Sox are a realistic landing point.

 

How could this happen to such an "above average SS" like Drew?!?

  • Replies 4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
There are very few good SS's in the game to begin with and there will be fewer available at the trade deadline. If you don't sign Drew now, you're not gonna get a shot at a player of his caliber at the deadline. That being said, you shouldn't need him. It's Bogaerts' time and you've built enough good will after the improbable title run to give the kid the appropriate time to develop at the big league level

 

Bogaerts isn't really the issue. A large % of Sox fans who would like Drew to be signed think Middlebrooks is the issue. The team that won the World Series had Drew at SS, Bogey at 3B and WMB on the pine.

Posted

I don't think that Drew's market will collapse to the point where the Red Sox would be the only team involved. What kind of deal does everyone have in mind? 1/10? I have to believe that there would be other teams that would be interested at that price.

 

I think he'll sign for 2/24 or 3/30 to play 2B for Toronto.

Posted
I don't think that Drew's market will collapse to the point where the Red Sox would be the only team involved. What kind of deal does everyone have in mind? 1/10? I have to believe that there would be other teams that would be interested at that price.

 

I think he'll sign for 2/24 or 3/30 to play 2B for Toronto.

 

Toronto has the #11 pick in the draft. I do not think they will find Stephen Drew to be worth a pick that low.

Posted
How could this happen to such an "above average SS" like Drew?!?

 

Draft-pick cost. And he's not an "above average SS" in quotation. He's an ABOVE AVERAGE SS in caps.

Posted
Toronto has the #11 pick in the draft. I do not think they will find Stephen Drew to be worth a pick that low.

 

That pick is exempt because it's compensation for failing to sign their 2013 first round pick.

Posted
How could this happen to such an "above average SS" like Drew?!?

 

 

A big part of it happened when the Yankees re-signed Derek Jeter. I don't think boras was counting on them fully recommitting themselves to a guy who looked ready to retire.

 

And yes, Drew is a very good shortstop on both sides of the ball. I'm amazed no one is going for him. If we didn't have a top prospect in the wings we'd be all over keeping this guy.

Posted
That pick is exempt because it's compensation for failing to sign their 2013 first round pick.

 

Are you sure it is exempt? I am reading over the rules and can find no reason why it would be.

Community Moderator
Posted
A big part of it happened when the Yankees re-signed Derek Jeter. I don't think boras was counting on them fully recommitting themselves to a guy who looked ready to retire.

 

And yes, Drew is a very good shortstop on both sides of the ball. I'm amazed no one is going for him. If we didn't have a top prospect in the wings we'd be all over keeping this guy.

If no gm in baseball is showing interest in a guy who helped win a WS, maybe he's overrated on here a little bit?

Posted
If no gm in baseball is showing interest in a guy who helped win a WS, maybe he's overrated on here a little bit?

 

Most people are saying he's an above-average SS, which I think is an accurate description. The problem is there aren't a lot of teams that are going to want to surrender a 1st round pick for a player like Drew. It doesn't help that most teams are set at SS. It also doesn't help that the teams that have a need at SS are awful (Mets) and Drew wouldn't impact their chances. Also, teams aren't going to forget that Drew was awful in 2012 and has an injury history. He's also in his decline years.

 

I think he's going to have agree to play 2B to get the best offer, unless he agrees to sign for 2/20 to sign with the Mets.

Posted
If no gm in baseball is showing interest in a guy who helped win a WS, maybe he's overrated on here a little bit?

 

His offense might be overrated a bit. The WAR projections for Drew for 2014 are only about 2, where he was 3.4 on FanGraphs for 2013. Looks like the main reason is his home/road splits. He had an 859 OPS at Fenway and 687 on the road. Which might be one more reason that Boston is the perfect fit for him.

Posted
Between Bogaerts, Middlebrooks and Drew, SS and 3B isn't likely to be an issue. The question in my mind is that if they can ever drag Pedroia off the field, who backs up at second, X or Drew.
Posted
If no gm in baseball is showing interest in a guy who helped win a WS, maybe he's overrated on here a little bit?

 

Or perhaps he came onto the market at a bad time.

 

baffles me that a SS who defended at a quite passable level and hit 50 XBH would have this much trouble finding a buyer.

Posted
Between Bogaerts, Middlebrooks and Drew, SS and 3B isn't likely to be an issue. The question in my mind is that if they can ever drag Pedroia off the field, who backs up at second, X or Drew.

 

the dude who they traded Morales for.

Posted
Or perhaps he came onto the market at a bad time.

 

baffles me that a SS who defended at a quite passable level and hit 50 XBH would have this much trouble finding a buyer.

 

I am pretty certain it has to do with multiple factors. First of all, the off season seems to have come to a halt while Tanaka finds a home. Drew will cost a draft pick. Many potential teams that would have been interested have other options. His agent, Scott Boras, likes to wait it out.

Posted
the dude who they traded Morales for.

 

If they have Drew, NWIH Herrerra is on the team. Probably he'd be shoved down to AAA to wait for an injury.

Community Moderator
Posted
I am pretty certain it has to do with multiple factors. First of all, the off season seems to have come to a halt while Tanaka finds a home. Drew will cost a draft pick. Many potential teams that would have been interested have other options. His agent, Scott Boras, likes to wait it out.

 

You think Boras isn't proactive enough, or just knows he'll get signed later anyway?

Posted
Or perhaps he came onto the market at a bad time.

 

baffles me that a SS who defended at a quite passable level and hit 50 XBH would have this much trouble finding a buyer.

 

How? How many teams are legitimate fits for Drew?

Posted
...and are willing to give up a draft pick for him. That's the real problem. Some team would have upgraded if he didn't come with the draft pick attachment.
Posted
There are very few good SS's in the game to begin with and there will be fewer available at the trade deadline. If you don't sign Drew now, you're not gonna get a shot at a player of his caliber at the deadline. That being said, you shouldn't need him. It's Bogaerts' time and you've built enough good will after the improbable title run to give the kid the appropriate time to develop at the big league level

 

Thanks Jacko; some of us here have been saying that for the past few weeks. This IS the perfect time to turn the page and get those young players into the mix. Let Drew go elsewhere or let him sit out until June when a team signing him will not cost them a draft pick.

Posted
I don't think you even read the post. You just picked out the part you thought resonated with your argument. We shouldn't "need" him, but he's clearly an upgrade.
Posted
I'd be surprised if they signed Drew. He doesn't fit moneywise or rosterwise--having just traded for a more versatile, younger and cheaper player. Getting Herrera showed me what the FO may be thinking. He's a guy who hits well enough to play for sustained periods at 3B, SS or 2B. Besides, the FO doesn't owe a damned thing to Boras, having just bartered off Ellsbury to the Yankees. Let him hang in the breeze.
Posted

More versatile? Check. Younger? Check. Cheaper? Check?

 

Better? By no means whatsoever. Herrera doesn't hold a candle to Drew, and by not bringing Drew back if he's out there for a decent price, you're gambling on Middlebrooks and bogaerts, two unproven unknowns, to a level that I do not believe a perennial championship contender should be doing.

Posted
'Play the kids' sounds great right now. If we're a few weeks into the season and the tandem of Bogaerts and Middlebrooks is looking shaky, we'll see how long that 'play the kids' attitude holds up. In my experience, not very long.
Posted
'Play the kids' sounds great right now. If we're a few weeks into the season and the tandem of Bogaerts and Middlebrooks is looking shaky, we'll see how long that 'play the kids' attitude holds up. In my experience, not very long.

 

The hilarious thing is that the first person who'd come out whining about the "FO's incompetence for not having a plan in case X/WMB struggled" is Fred. And he would deny it vehemently until someone came into this thread and called him out on it, at which point he still wouldn't shut up about it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...