Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
People really need to curb the personal name-calling. It leads nowhere good.

 

Trolls are not people. They are mythical creatures with spiky hair and cute little outfits sold at the Dollar Tree for .99 Cents.

 

Besides the fact that this dude is clearly BOY aka Fire_Theo aka countless other tags.

  • Replies 5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Trolls are not people. They are mythical creatures with spiky hair and cute little outfits sold at the Dollar Tree for .99 Cents.

 

Besides the fact that this dude is clearly BOY aka Fire_Theo aka countless other tags.

 

You see I was waiting for you to throw BOY out there again. I did my homework the guy was a racist. So you could say I now get the illegials the blacks quiz.

 

Well, my good friend. I'M CAMPAIGNING FOR CARL CRAWFORD A BLACK MAN OVER JAYSON WERTH WHO IS CLEARLY WHITE!!

 

And if you aren't catching my drift on the campaigning comment he also called me some Republican poster. :dunno:

 

I want Crawford as bad as anyone who wants him yet I'm clearly BOY, a racist.

Posted
The Dunn signing takes an option off the board. The less options available the more intense the competition for the remaining talent will become. Crawford will cost a King's ransom, and if Werth goes for $17 million or more (Holliday money), our FO will have outsmarted itself.
Posted
The Dunn signing takes an option off the board. The less options available the more intense the competition for the remaining talent will become. Crawford will cost a King's ransom' date=' and if Werth goes for $17 million or more (Holliday money), our FO will have outsmarted itself.[/quote']

 

My point to the Tee.

Posted
You see I was waiting for you to throw BOY out there again. I did my homework the guy was a racist. So you could say I now get the illegials the blacks quiz.

 

Well, my good friend. I'M CAMPAIGNING FOR CARL CRAWFORD A BLACK MAN OVER JAYSON WERTH WHO IS CLEARLY WHITE!!

 

And if you aren't catching my drift on the campaigning comment he also called me some Republican poster. :dunno:

 

I want Crawford as bad as anyone who wants him yet I'm clearly BOY, a racist.

 

By you did your homework, you mean you yelled "I've been discovered!" and came up with this post?

 

Because BOY wasn't the guy's actual handle you know.

Posted
By you did your homework, you mean you yelled "I've been discovered!" and came up with this post?

 

Because BOY wasn't the guy's actual handle you know.

 

If you use the search engine alot of options present themselves. So as you read you find Boston owns U or something like that. They didn't teach you that in OPS and Sabremetrics class?

Posted
If you use the search engine alot of options present themselves. So as you read you find Boston owns U or something like that. They didn't teach you that in OPS and Sabremetrics class?

 

That wasn't part of the class. However "Troll-spotting" and "Multiple-account spotting" were.

 

On-topic:

 

Jose Lopez has been non-tendered.

 

Possible utility player candidate?

Posted
The Dunn signing takes an option off the board. The less options available the more intense the competition for the remaining talent will become. Crawford will cost a King's ransom' date=' and if Werth goes for $17 million or more (Holliday money), our FO will have outsmarted itself.[/quote']Why don't we stop the bickering and address real issues like this^.
Posted
Why don't we stop the bickering and address real issues like this^.

 

I have two questions for you:

 

1) With Boras as an agent, why do you believe Werth will sign before Crawford?

 

2) Can you name me an instance where you think the FO has done something right? Just one will be enough....

Posted
I have two questions for you:

 

1) With Boras as an agent, why do you believe Werth will sign before Crawford?

 

2) Can you name me an instance where you think the FO has done something right? Just one will be enough....

 

I know this wasn't for me to answer. But the Lackey deal. It was under the radar the Sox got their man. If you want a player don't negiotate through the media hello Tex. Either sign him or don't No need to chizzle the guy.

Posted
I have two questions for you:

 

1) With Boras as an agent, why do you believe Werth will sign before Crawford?

 

2) Can you name me an instance where you think the FO has done something right? Just one will be enough....

In answer to #1, I never said that Werth would sign first. Where did you get that?

 

Your question #2 is ridiculous. I present a concern about how the off season is going, and rather than address the issue, you come back with this?

 

Edit: Your question #2 is ridiculous and obnoxious.

Posted
In answer to #1' date=' I never said that Werth would sign first. Where did you get that?[/quote']

 

Because just like Werth getting a Holliday deal (not the AAV, but the years, or over 100 million for that matter), as well as Pujols leaving the Cards, him signing first is also a dream.

 

Your question #2 is ridiculous. I present a concern about how the off season is going, and rather than address the issue, you come back with this?

 

Hey now, no need to get all mad and defensive. A simple "I liked when they signed player X" or "I liked it when they extended player x" would have sufficed.

Posted
Rumor has it that Werth is waiting for Crawford' date=' and Crawford is waiting for Lee.[/quote']

 

I don't buy that. If they guy wants for example 125 bones the Red Sox would offer 90. If they offered 115 bones they would get the player. Just a example no real numbers thrown out there. The White Sox Tigers had no trouble signing guys fast. But the Red Sox do.

Posted
Because just like Werth getting a Holliday deal (not the AAV' date=' but the years, or over 100 million for that matter), as well as Pujols leaving the Cards, him signing first is also a dream.[/quote']I really don't understand the point you are making especially since I never even addressed who would sign first as between Crawford and Werth. And how is Pujols relevant to this?

 

 

Hey now' date=' no need to get all mad and defensive. A simple "I liked when they signed player X" or "I liked it when they extended player x" would have sufficed.[/quote']If I liked a move in 2007 or a move in 2009, how would that be relevant to this discussion?
Posted
Giants not biting on Scutaro

 

This from Nick Cafardo, who spoke to a source with the Giants: San Francisco is not trying to trade for Marco Scutaro to fill their hole at shortstop.

 

The Red Sox had reportedly made Scutaro available during the GM Meetings. But to date nothing has come of it.

 

Obviously the move would be to trade Scutaro then give Derek Jeter whatever he wants.

 

(Just kidding)

If the Sox are shopping Scutaro is it because they are so confident that Lowrie can fill the job on a full time basis, or do they expect Iglesias to make a splash in the majors in 2011? What do you think their game plan is at SS/
Posted
If the Sox are shopping Scutaro is it because they are so confident that Lowrie can fill the job on a full time basis' date=' or do they expect Iglesias to make a splash in the majors in 2011? What do you think their game plan is at SS/[/quote']

 

I think a little of both.

Posted
You see I was waiting for you to throw BOY out there again. I did my homework the guy was a racist. So you could say I now get the illegials the blacks quiz.

 

Well, my good friend. I'M CAMPAIGNING FOR CARL CRAWFORD A BLACK MAN OVER JAYSON WERTH WHO IS CLEARLY WHITE!!

 

And if you aren't catching my drift on the campaigning comment he also called me some Republican poster. :dunno:

 

I want Crawford as bad as anyone who wants him yet I'm clearly BOY, a racist.

 

Pretty sure anything he's ever written here was either, blocked or deleted. So either your him, or your lying about knowing about him. I'm not sure which one is dumber.

Posted
If the Sox are shopping Scutaro is it because they are so confident that Lowrie can fill the job on a full time basis' date=' or do they expect Iglesias to make a splash in the majors in 2011? What do you think their game plan is at SS/[/quote']

 

I think they are confident Lowrie and or Iglesias will become viable everyday SS option by 2012. I expect Iglesias to get a taste this year of the ML. I believe he's on the team or close coming out of 2012. And after that could very well be the everyday SS, while Lowries takes on Super Utility role.

Posted
CAP CANA, Domincan Republic — Adrian Beltre said just a few minutes ago that he could sign a deal "right now if I wanted to."

 

But the free agent third baseman is waiting to see what other options open up to him and maintained that his preference is to return to the Boston Red Sox.

 

"I got used to seeing that park full in the first inning and still full in the ninth inning. I liked that atmosphere," he said during an exclusive interview with the Globe. "If everything was close to the same, I would go back to Boston. But we have to see. The number of years is what is important to me."

 

Beltre flew from Los Angeles for David Ortiz's charity event here. He arrived at a seaside reception tonight with Hall of Famer Jim Rice and immediately gathered in a group to talk to Ortiz, Daniel Bard and Darnell McDonald.

 

"I would to play with these guys again," Beltre said. "I was disappointed Victor (Martinez) left because he helped make me comfortable. But I had a feeling that would happen because he wasn't happy with how (the Red Sox) approached it with him. But I would still come back. I liked playing there and I want to be with a contender."

 

Beltre said he could arrive at a decision soon. He would not get into specifics about what teams he was considering beyond saying he still hoped to return to Boston.

 

http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/extras/extra_bases/2010/12/beltre_hopes_to.html

 

Interesting.....

Posted

I have a question.

 

Who here besides me thinks that trading Kalish+ (without Kelly) for A-Gon and signing Crawford then Konerko makes sense?

Posted
I'd like it more if we didn't resign Big Papi.

 

Pfffft.......what a brainfart.

 

How about Gonzales + Crawford. Period.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...