Why so cynical?

[Dipre]

LOL @ Grienke being higher the Cole Hamels, who might have the best change up in baseball.

 

 

Carpenter was good, but we haven't seen what he can do in awhile.

 

He said in no particular order.

[JimEdHOF2009]

LOL @ Grienke being higher the Cole Hamels, who might have the best change up in baseball.

 

 

Carpenter was good, but we haven't seen what he can do in awhile.

 

I guess you missed when I said.."In no particular order"..I even made a joke about it...sheez.

 

Anyhow, Grienke has 3 plus pitches. 95-97 Fastball(much harder than Hamels 91-92). Greinke also has a nasty 12-to-6 curve..better than Coles. Greinke also has a very nice changeup...nowhere near as god as Cole's.

 

How you would LOL, as you so eloquently put it, is beyond me. Grienke has a wider array of piches...and overall, I would say "stuff-wise", he is right there with Hamels-- although Hamels is the better pitcher at this juncture.

[example1]

LOL @ Grienke being higher the Cole Hamels, who might have the best change up in baseball.

 

 

Carpenter was good, but we haven't seen what he can do in awhile.

 

LOL @ you making fun of his post without noticing the "In no apparent order" label he put on his list.

 

EDIT: lol @ me for piling on

[BSN07]

Help help I can't breathe, get off me!!!!!!!!!!

 

 

LOL Sorry bought that guys, I was reading threw everything at warp speed to catch up on everything from last night. And obviously I have failed at reading and comprehending the complete post.

[jacksonianmarch]

JimEd, you sir, are a moron. Stuff is different from control. Stuff is velocity and movement. Control is how well you locate your stuff. Saying that you consider stuff to be stuff + control should make you think that maybe you are missing out on the whole point. But that sounds like we'd be reinventing the wheel. Yep, Jim Ed, missing a point. Never thought I'd see that one comin. Just sayin.

[Dojji]

It's official then: Daniel Cabrera has the best stuff in the majors. All he needs to do is locate it.

[jacksonianmarch]

and I would have a difficult time arguing that.

[Dojji]

That happens sometimes when you can't back off an argument in time and wind up trying to save it by playing word games. Been there. Many times.

[jacksonianmarch]

I am not backing off the argument.

[Dojji]

Then how about an actual defense if the concept of AJ Burnett's quality that doesn't nominate Cabrera for the hall of fame?

[diony]

Then how about an actual defense if the concept of AJ Burnett's quality that doesn't nominate Cabrera for the hall of fame?

 

Because Cabrera sucks.

[Dojji]

Brilliant.

[MANNYHOF24]

Brilliant.

 

He's right. That was a bad arguement.

[CrespoBlows]

Then how about an actual defense if the concept of AJ Burnett's quality that doesn't nominate Cabrera for the hall of fame?

 

A.J. Burnett actually has the ability to throw his pitches over the plate. Cabrera might settle for four feet out of the strike zone.

[rician blast]

I think that getting Mark Texiera would have instantly made our lineup historically good' date=' and I share the frusteration at the FO for losing by 10 million dollars, it sucks. Anyone who doesnt think that sucks is oblivious as hell. [/quote']

 

He

did

not

want

to

play

in

Boston.

 

So what's to be 'frusterated' about...it is what it is, the Sox now have to move on.

[jacksonianmarch]

Then how about an actual defense if the concept of AJ Burnett's quality that doesn't nominate Cabrera for the hall of fame?

 

My post was solely about stuff. In terms of his control, AJ's is world's better.

[Dipre]

JimEd' date='[b'] you sir[/b], are a moron. Stuff is different from control. Stuff is velocity and movement. Control is how well you locate your stuff. Saying that you consider stuff to be stuff + control should make you think that maybe you are missing out on the whole point. But that sounds like we'd be reinventing the wheel. Yep, Jim Ed, missing a point. Never thought I'd see that one comin. Just sayin.

 

It's catching on......i need to © it now!