Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

drewski6

Verified Member
  • Posts

    3,800
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by drewski6

  1. Im starting to think we dont have enough spots for the studs we have, clearly Eaton and Ward are all-stars. I might be drunk on spring hopefulness.
  2. Paredes isnt good enough to make this trade. If they are going to make a trade, packaging depth - it neesds to be for a superstar - not for a lesser player + improvements around the margins. Marte is worth trading Abreu, Paredes is not.
  3. It is a very good defense for sure.
  4. Sure, but Yoshida is more competing with Eaton and Ward than Campbell
  5. Sounds like he priced himself out of Boston this spring (kidding!)
  6. One from each word from a spacing perspective, not a technical perspective. Its for hand written notes and it just means (bring down above word). It doesnt matter , and Im not trying to be a jerk, but if you care, the "correct" would be: Sandoval (at some point) Crawford (" " ") But like if you used your imvho you would only put a " under that not 5 of them because even though its 5 words, its one word from a "between two spaces" point of view. Really its best use is when you are hand writing notes and want to change one thing from the note above. For eample: Amendment 2 Section II Article B (p.59) states Brands cost $70 " " " " " C " " generics " $15 Which means: Amendment 2 Section II Article C (p.59) states generics cost $15 Keep in mind this is for shorthand, like note taking during a meeting, so what is technically correct is really jsut whatever is gonna work for you.
  7. For a while my thought was : less bullpen pitchers = more innings for Kutter Crawford (a good thing) but I think I need to come off that. I do think we could use one more. Especially if they are going to start with Kutter/Sandoval on IL and Tolle/Early in AAA.
  8. Was he a 40 man roster crunch casualty? Please remind me :)
  9. Wait a minute. Sir, are you implying that the USA is not the world universe? That anywhere or anybody else matters? Are you sure its the right climate for that kind of talk? Dont find yourself on a list, bro
  10. See Ward is a guy who I want going to the plate, thinking "I really want a walk here". Casas, not so much.
  11. I found a few bunt doubles so its been done. Mostly harder bunts that went through the infield or down teh line against a shift and there was just nobody there. But its been done. Maybe Ward will hit the first bunt triple?
  12. If Ward spends this entire year for Woo, and does decently well, I bet he'll be on the team next year even at 28. Its hard to enter the prospect universe when you are north of 25 and were never considered a top prospect before, but its possible. I certainly agree age is taken into account. If you try out for WWE and do decent and you are 19 they would be more interested in you than if you were 37. I see what you are saying, and Im starting to agree. The only thing is that I dont think its a knock or anything based on anything "going-forward". By that I mean, I dont think they are like "yeah but heres why we dont think hes a future MLB player", I think the fact that hes not on the team is more because of hte past. Its hard to rise from off all prsopects lists/radars wh osigned for a chicken sandwich to on a breakout / future games in one spring. Its harder to make it if you are 27. So I get he has all that working against him. But this is more than just a fun story. Ward has real trade value TODAY. And his soxprospects page is coming. Id put him at like #17. ANd if he was 20 years old he'd be like #8.
  13. I see now that this is more of an MiLB thing than a local/team thing. And I assume that Ward rose too quickly to be considered for this. But I dont think its that he aged out or anything like that because Mullins in on the team and hes 26. I think Ward is a prospect, and a good one, the world just has to catch up. He'll be on soxprospects.com prospect list in 2 weeks. And he'll be higher than plenty of guys on the prospects team.
  14. I would assume not, but I would assume that because Watson has a sox prospects page that ranks him our #19 prospect, he is a prospect ....So Im not sure why Braiden Ward isnt on their radar at sox prospects or why he is considered a post-prospect. Unless its a timing thing, which I assume to be the case. I didnt realize this was an actual roster that plays a game. I thought it was someone ranking spring breakouts. Ward might not have been considerd a prospect a month ago, but he is now.
  15. Have we ever seen a bunt double?
  16. I think they need to update their prospect list and put him at....16? Bump Miguel to 17?
  17. Ryan Watson is 28 and has a page on sox prospects.
  18. Because hes not under 25? You cant be over 24 and be a prospect?
  19. Ward doesnt make the spring breakout roster? Shouldnt he be like: name 1.
  20. Make sure you turn the sound on. Found the bird I was talking about. I can watch this all day.
  21. Im not going to sub in for him and chat about birds with you, so be careful here. Ill chat about dogs with you, but not birds. Unless its this dancing parrot that keeps coming up on my social media feed....He gets after it.
  22. More like: Pedro Cerrano "Bats are sick, I cannot hit curveball"
  23. My buddy Pat is texting me about it right now, and he was an all-star closer in college so he knows (granted a division III school, but still) - further than I got. And I cant hit his slider, no way. Dudes turning 40 and still throws a low-eighties wipe out slider (it was mid 80s in his prime).
×
×
  • Create New...