Yup. And sometimes when a player has a decent year, it ends up hurting you because then you roll over mediocre production the next 4 years. And 20 HR/644 at-bats proves nothing. Its actually a low power output considering his slow feet and lack of athleticism.
One of the worst players to ever come through here. Because if he hit .000 in his first 665 at-bats, he would have been shipped out and we would have been better off.
Like I said, the stat line for those first 640 games wasnt bad on the surface, but it bought Verdugo too many years of stinky play and I just dont like the complacency of rolling over someone who isnt fast or strong.
To be honest, Im contradicting myself a bit here - so let me clarify. I agree with you that the 665 initial at-bats made Verdugo look like a serviceable player at the time. At the time, I thought hey, we may have something here. But he was overrated even after those first 665 at-bats becoming a fan favorite for really no good reason. I grew to hate the guy because I didnt like his loner demeanor and he stuck around entirely too long, way past his welcome.
In hindsight , the return for Betts was horrible. But I do think that regardless of stats over 644 at-bats, the fact that he was slow and not strong and not athletic were clues that he wasnt going to pan out. You shouldnt be surprised he failed in 2026. But I understand thinking at the time of trade, he would be a solid get.
Kind of like watching a movie a second time and seeing clues you missed the first time. (not you personally)
For me personally, I got so sick of all my friends loving Verdugo and Im like this guy is soooooo mediocre (this was well after his first 644 seasons)
Imagine playing a rookie QB who does well. Then stinks for 2 seasons. Going into that fourth season all your pals are like "hes good, look at that rookie season." then the team gave him that fourth year because in this example, that good rookie season wound up being a curse in disguise becasue you kept the player around too long hoping he can find it again. When that first season could have been luck and yes you can luck into 20 homeruns in 644 at-bats. Well not all 20, but if its a 15 homer season + 5 lucky homeruns due to conditions (wind blowing out, hitters parks...)