drewski6
Verified Member-
Posts
4,692 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by drewski6
-
Red Sox 2025 Season Review/Offseason Preview Thread
drewski6 replied to Brandon Glick's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
The red sox have an outstanding offer to bregman that pushes them above 264. If he says yes, i dont think we'll trade with the intention of getting under 264. If we like Lodolo more than duran, and that so happens to get us under the number thats one thing. But the 264 is barely a number. If you go over 244m thats a big deal, so it makes sense as number you want to circle because if you go over it , your tax for going over it again next year is higher. 284 is a nubmer because if you go over it, your draft picks move back. 264 does nothing. The difference in tax between 270 and 263 is very very very little. I dont think they can sign Bregman and stay under 264 for tax purposes. I think theyll be deferrals but not enough to get the cbt number THAT low. I think if bregman says yes, we'll be over 264. And JH already approved it, thats why there is an offer in bregmans hand. Theres only like 20m before 264. If the AAV of the outstanding offer to bregman was 20m (even net of deferrals) nobody would be calling it "aggressive" Right now, whether or not the sox go over 264 is up to bregman (my opinion) because if he says yes, i think we'll be over and stay over. Now to some of your other points....If lets say the phills sign Bo Bichette right now and then say we'll give Bohm away for free (like a prospect nobody has ever heard of). Then maybe we pull our offer for Breg and take Bohm for a non-prospect , prospect. Maybe the sox decide that if another option emerges like Bohm, theyd rather than than restricting future spending. Your point about is bregman worth restricting future spending? Its a good question and worth pondering. But none of this has anything to do with that 264 number. -
Red Sox Have "Aggressive" Offer On Table For Alex Bregman
drewski6 replied to Alex Mayes's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
mvp said something about "maybe cole back" for NYY, that was (I hate to admit this) music to my ears. I jsut assumed hed be back, and if i was wrong (and probably am cuz I trust MVP having an informed opinion vs my assumption) - that changes things and knocks NYY down significantly. ANd yes i could google gerrit cole injury timeline right now but i made this post instead. -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
drewski6 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
no the point is that dudes are going to move around the diamond all year, get use to it. -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
drewski6 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
we arent talking about valuing 3b vs 4th of'er we are talking about guys sticking to one position. My points is that we'll shuffle and we'll shuffle all season long Our defensive alignment will be fluid based on who is pitching that day, injuries, who is hot The days of "our first baseman is hurt, bring in backup 1b, keep everything else the same" are dead. Now if someone gets hurt, you move dudes around, if your backup 3b is better than your backup 1b. Positions arent rigid, is my point. If mayer and story are hurt AND Duran, Abreu, Cedanne, and Abreu are all swinging a hot bat, Cedanne is playing infield for a spell (not a game either). And thats not a 1% likely outcome either, its like 35% likely to happen. My point is that when you provided your who is playing where, injuries change that. But its not going to be, injured outfielder, replace with outfielder. If Nav gets hurt, Contreras will catch more. If multiple infielders get hurt, Cedanne will play more infield. Versatility is good. -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
drewski6 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Then mayer gets hurt? -
Red Sox 2025 Season Review/Offseason Preview Thread
drewski6 replied to Brandon Glick's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Teams dont intentionally bid against themselves. Maybe rarely. I agree that the Red Sox wont intentionally give Bregman way more money than his second best offer, but whats that really saying. Yesterday you said that you would rather trade for marte at 15m , you dont think the sox would go over 264, and that you would rather trade for marte than sign bregman (and start trading Duran for players making less to get under 264) Today , you are saying that youd rather sign Bregman than pay the trade capital for Marte. Not trying to call you out , and you are allowed to change your mind....Im genuinely asking, 1 of 3 things happened here either 1. you changed your mind and think the sox are willing to go above 264 2. you still dont think sox would go above 264, but youd now rather sign bregman and trade to get back under that number and youd rather do that than trade for marte (change from yesterday) 3. you think the sox can ink bregman and stay under 264 CBT Im jsut trying to understand. -
Red Sox Have "Aggressive" Offer On Table For Alex Bregman
drewski6 replied to Alex Mayes's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
My order is prob: TOronto, NYY, Mariners, Sox, Orioles NYY and SEa are very close. -
Red Sox Have "Aggressive" Offer On Table For Alex Bregman
drewski6 replied to Alex Mayes's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
This order, and if you say yes, you know who is going to appear Say their name (Mariners) and he appears, I believe in Harmony -
Im going to assume that our pitching coaches at the major league level are better than our pitching coaches at the minor league level. If he needs to tweak his changeup grip, or release point or any of that stuff, lets have him work with our best coaches to do it. Pitchers work in new pitches every year, sometimes between starts. Tolle needs to establish his identity but I think its more likely to happen at the major league level. I say, give him the chance to win the job.
-
Red Sox 2025 Season Review/Offseason Preview Thread
drewski6 replied to Brandon Glick's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
I dont know what you mean by you dont think we'll pay bregman more than other teams will offer, we dont know what other teams have offered. When both were options (Bregman, Marte) of course theres a point of negotiation with either , where you start focusing on the other side....SO for example Bregman laughs in your fact at 170 (not saying he did or would) you start focusing with Arizona for Marte, Arizona demands Roman Anthony or nothing, you start focusing on Bregman (and other options).....I get all that. So sure, there is always a point where you start looking for alternatives. Obvs new news changes things - but would I rather sign Bregman or trade for Marte. It depends on the cost for both. Id rather trade Duran and Harrison than sign Bregman for 200m But Id rather sign Bregman for $150m than trade Roman for Marte And I know Im not using realistic, but the point remains. -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
drewski6 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
And if story gets hurt? WHile all 4 OF'ers are playing great? They arent going to bench a hot player. Theyll shuffle. -
Red Sox 2025 Season Review/Offseason Preview Thread
drewski6 replied to Brandon Glick's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Go Skubal! -
Red Sox 2025 Season Review/Offseason Preview Thread
drewski6 replied to Brandon Glick's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Didnt you say the exact opposite to me yesterday? -
The real world is gray with an infinite number of ever-changing variables. Everything is case by case. Rigidity is for boomers. If you are unwilling to be flexible/creative/negotiate/think-outside-the-box/reconsider when uphill factors change (e.g. we missed out on player x, we are now willing to up our offer to player y)...you are being too rigid to your own detriment Nothing happens in a vacuum. The walk point on Bregman obvious changes as alternatives come off the board. Now I do agree that just 1m more, in perpetuity, can be a trap. But that doesnt mean that you view negotiations with a black/white/simple lens because if you are not willing to get creative, you are just not using everything available to you.
-
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
drewski6 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
I think there are only three players on this team who will be full time at a specific position (except when on bench) - Abreu, Nav, story Cedanne will play infield sparingly, Duran will play some outfield, some dh. If Nav is playing hes at C, if Abreu is playing hes at RF. If STory is playing he is at SS (personally, I would play cedanne at ss more than most) but I dont expect them too. But cedanne will play a little 2b here and there. They will rotate through the DH spot (Anthony, Duran, Romy, Yoshida) I wouldnt consider Yoshida a backup DH, I would consider him part of a DH committee, but I do agree that unless hes hitting gappers in ST, its hard to justify carrying that on the 26 over a second platoon bat. If Yoshida makes the team and his hitting gappers, fine. If hes rolling over everything, and a couple singles are getting through the infield and thats the extent of his contributions - but he stays with the major league team - then we'll (justifiably) complain that we shoulda kept Refsnyder. -
Red Sox Have "Aggressive" Offer On Table For Alex Bregman
drewski6 replied to Alex Mayes's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Ive heard plenty of musicians talk about similar stuff. Aaron Lewis of Stain'd once said when he was young , it was easy for him to write music because he was angry, driven, and determined. It was his outlet, it was his passion, it was his release, it was his therapy Flash forward, now he's rich and happy, and hes not as determined/passionate/angry which is great for his own mental health, more power to him, but his music went to s***. Not a perfect comparison, but even from my own standpoint - no WS will ever compare to 2004. Because once the monkey if off your back. Future championship are cool and great, but the first one (especially after a longish career) is just different. Look at KG running around screaming "im certified" The passion/desire/drive to get back to the top of the mountain may not be 100% of the passion/desire/drive of the first climb Your theory - we dont know for sure - but its not unreasonable -
Red Sox Have "Aggressive" Offer On Table For Alex Bregman
drewski6 replied to Alex Mayes's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Its okay to be a compassionate human. Hey HR, I know this person would take 115k. But beore you offer that, Im jazzed about this candidate, and they got f'd over in their last job. I know that they may be a little desperate cuz currently out of work, and they make take that 115k they made last job, they may even take a little less. But can we please offer 130k , so the candidate, after all that stress, after all that OMG I lost my job, this is terrible , what are we going to do!?! After all that panic, this PERSON can come away with a better paying job and think hey maybe that was all for a reason. They can feel like they landed on their feet. I really like the human. Lets do something swell and generous! Im willing to take the extra money from my budget even if it slightly decreases my bonus ^ people who are not ruthless jerks -
Red Sox Have "Aggressive" Offer On Table For Alex Bregman
drewski6 replied to Alex Mayes's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Ive hired people for 130k that I know would have taken 115k, and ive done it multiple times. Its not always about MAX PROFITSSSSSS -
Red Sox Have "Aggressive" Offer On Table For Alex Bregman
drewski6 replied to Alex Mayes's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
6/170 is at the upper level, and I can see it, but its higher than I would guess. But when I say "deserve", what I mean is that his contract WILL BE compared to Alonso and Schwarber. If the offer is under 150m, I assure you Bregmans agent is reminding the team that Alonso and Schwarber did better. Now if Bregmans best offer is 140 from the sox and the sox are wise to it, it may not work, but I assure you its getting mentioned, if not anything but as a last ditch tactic...."You cant find a way to add 10m more so my client feels like he made the same as Alonso/Schwarber and doesnt have to feel like hes less than?" And if its the opposite, lets say the offer is sitting out there at 160m, again I assure you, the team is repeatedly reminding breg's agent that the offer is more than alonso/schwarber. Look, we do want Breg back ,we've offered more than Alonso got, more than Schwarber got, this shows Breg was always plan A, it proves we do really want him and we want him at fair price not just "our price". If it were me, and I was Bres, and I was getting a call about Breg from his agent, its how I would answer the phone: "Hi , thanks for calling. Sorry if youve heard this but the amount of our offer is more than alonso got , more than bregman got.... -
Red Sox Have "Aggressive" Offer On Table For Alex Bregman
drewski6 replied to Alex Mayes's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Heres what I keep coming back to: Schwarber vs Bregman HItting : Schwarber 2.5 points (significantly better) Fielding: Bregman 2 points (schwarb doesnt even field) Age: Bregman 0.5 pt (slightly younger) TIE Alonso vs Bregman Hitting : Alonso 1 pt Fielding Bregman 2 pts Age: Alonso 1 pt TIE So to me , the magic number is around 150 -
Red Sox Have "Aggressive" Offer On Table For Alex Bregman
drewski6 replied to Alex Mayes's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
To be clear - the 6/170 rumors are derived from that is what the tigers offered him last year. Thats not from like a current leak. -
Red Sox Have "Aggressive" Offer On Table For Alex Bregman
drewski6 replied to Alex Mayes's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
6/170 = very aggressive. We made an aggressive offer, hold the very So you could be correct, I could also be overanalyzing. Also both those things can be true (you win up being correct, while I am over here overanalyzing the absence of the word "very") I do think that ego matters to these athletes, and thats why I think the magic number is 156, not 140. Its silly but the team can be look, more than alonso, more than schwarber It may be 6/156, it may be 5/156, it may be 4/146 with a team option but 10m buyout for yr 5 like Moon's proposed structure. But I dont think Bregman deserves less than Schwarber/Alonso. It terms of total earning power, I would have ranked: Tucker Bo Breg Alonso Schwarber -
Red Sox 2025 Season Review/Offseason Preview Thread
drewski6 replied to Brandon Glick's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Yes, and my point is that I dont think they are concerned about 264, which this offer would put them past. -
Red Sox 2025 Season Review/Offseason Preview Thread
drewski6 replied to Brandon Glick's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Its out of the red sox hands, right? Because theres an offer in hand. So its bregmans call. I think that offer is around 30m/yr. Bring us up to about 275ish mil, thats about where i think our payroll will be. Now if bregman says no, and signs with toronto/arizona/cubs (anyone), and the red sox turn around and trade early,duran,philips for Marte, and you come on here saying, I think this is what i would have preferred and i therefore think its a blessing in disguise that bregman said no.....I would prob like the post. But right now, the red sox payroll stands at 245m, and they have an "aggressive" offer to Bregman. I assure you "aggressive" is more than 25m/yr, so... -
Red Sox 2025 Season Review/Offseason Preview Thread
drewski6 replied to Brandon Glick's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Regarding this: an aggressive offer is on the table. What do you think that means? Its not 20m/yr. So if Bregman, right now, calls Bres and says "yes" the payroll at that point in time , will be as high as I think it should. Our current payroll + pending offer is quite high. I think where we disagree is what that outstanding offer for Bregman is. I doubt its under 135m.

