Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Hugh2

Verified Member
  • Posts

    3,725
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Hugh2

  1. There’s low payroll teams who do well, and high payroll teams that do horribly. some years there’s more of these than others. but overall the long term trend is spending money wins you more games. that shouldn’t be undeniable.
  2. Well don’t let me stop you, and thank you for reminding me to go brew some coffee
  3. I get your point, but answering that question the way you want to creates a new one. Why go over in 2022? One year doesn’t start a trend, it will be more telling each year they don’t go over.
  4. Shedding payroll to get under the cap wasn’t a break away from the norm. The Sox have NEVER stayed over the cap staying under the cap is the break from norm.
  5. Ok, that totally makes sense, but I’m sure you can appreciate that having being responded to makes it feel like it’s me. it’s ok, I don’t feel attacked, no need to report me to the moderator lol
  6. I’m just not sure what people are even disagreeing with.
  7. How many times do I have to say I’m not advocating trading Duran. I want to keep Duran. I just don’t disagree that his value may be at peak right now.
  8. I don’t count 2020 and you shouldn’t too, and they did go over in 22. So maybe the new trend is to stay under two years in a row and then go over? I dunno, I don’t disagree the spending habits has changed. But we can’t say they decided to stay under the cap back in 2020 when they went over in 22
  9. There’s a difference between wanting to trade Duran and then agreeing his value may be at an all time high. I agree with the later not necessarily the former.
  10. 1. I’ve made this exact point in here, many times that his 2024 season also raises his floor with me. duran adds value in too many different ways to regress so much. Base running, defense, offense. He’s not crashing to a 2 War player. 2. This could be said about any player at any time.
  11. The yes, speed absolutely goes first. this is perhaps a physiological question and not a baseball question. genetic freaks can maintain an elite level of athleticism that still sets them apart for a few years longer because they’re falling from a higher point, and people’s training programs can stave off father of time slower. But the wall is undefeated. human athletic performance on average peaks at 27. That’s just a fact about the human body and has been pretty well documented.
  12. You’re right, but one could be forgiven last year for thinking such. This year was the first year they really broke the trend and went under two years in a row, before 2024 they’d dip under reset and then spend.
  13. I was told they made a two year offer. But front office aside, there were many Sox fans who didn’t wants Teoscar and I did and I was and they were wrong. Petty, I know I know….stop raining on my Sunday morning thoughts darn it!!!!
  14. Yes, but team aside many fans didn’t like the ideal because they said Teoscar was in serious decline. I was of the opinion he could have a huge comeback year to rebuild his value. I was right. however, I advocated the one year deal on the assumption that the Sox would continue their go over the cap two years and reset model. They broke that trend last year. Teoscar was never an option for them.
  15. If you’re using two HOFer against the larger sample size of literally everyone else to try and disprove that physical skills decline with age you’re actually proving that physical skills do decline. If you have two guys on your list who are generational talents and decades apart. i get it, i do. But betting on Duran to age like Ricky Henderson would be an awful bet. Im pro not trading Duran, but I certainly can’t argue against trading him from a value perspective. Betting his value is at an all time high right now seems like a fairly safe bet.
  16. That’s exactly what I said
  17. LA offered 24 million for one year, now he’s hitting free agency as the best outfielder not name Juan Soto. If the Sox wanted him he could be had. But the Boston brass, like many in here didn’t value him at all.
  18. Random Sunday morning thoughts. Yoshida trade talk should die, it’s very unlikely, unless you’re willing to pay it all down or trade a top prospect please stop with the proposals. Tyler O’Neill is the 3rd highest ranked free agent outfielder this year. That goes to show you how bad free agency has got. More and more teams are locking up their talent. i was 100% right about Teoscar Hernandez. I was a very strong advocate of giving him a 1 year deal to build his value and I was right. He had an outstanding year. I wish I can remember who argued against me so vehemently so I could rub it in your face. Oh well. Starting Today in a Cleveland fan for 1-2 weeks.
  19. That's a pretty good way of putting it.
  20. Do teams trade players based on their value 6 months ago?
  21. Jud Fabian was once considered a consensus top ten pick before heading into his first draft year
  22. Is this meant for someone else? I never suggested Yoshida would net a starting pitcher or Gausman.
  23. I don't really think those guys are blocking anyone, and Abreu could be packaged up seperately for something of actual value (a good reliever). I think they should just do that and buy pitching.
  24. They're of comparable value, but you're probably getting absolutely nothing in return in that scenario. A complete low level flier. Which is fine, but how many wins does this team gain by taking Yoshida and Abreu off the roster?
×
×
  • Create New...