Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Hugh2

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,403

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Hugh2

  1. Hugh2
    I'm sure we will see 1-2 go in rounds 11-20. I think we see less HS players being drafted moving forward. I'm sure NIL is making a difference too. Kids can go to college, increase their stock and have a fallback education AND make money now.
  2. Hugh2
    https://www.mlb.com/draft/tracker/2025/all/team/redsox All pitchers and short stops lol
  3. Hugh2
    Very superficial compared to my overall point of plenty of pitchers going down this year. I didn't mean to imply that Dick Fitts had some high expectations.
  4. Hugh2
    I think they would net better than those two, but marginally better. We have to bid with about 20 teams here so if we want better talent this year it's going to have to sting a little.
  5. Hugh2
    Fangraphs has him at 1.8 FWar so far this year, and 2.8 for the previous two years combined. But yeah, he's distinctively been a different guy this year.
  6. Hugh2
    Soxprospects has said the following (not counting Mayer/Anthony Graduations) Witherspoon - between 4-7 Phillips - between 12-15 Godbout - between 25-30 Eyanson - 12-15
  7. Hugh2
    He was the best pitcher available by far, sometimes there's a difference between having a general organizational philosophy and recognizing there are more than one ways to skin a cat. If you get a chance to invest in a high end talent that might be a little outside your window of search parameters I think you still go for it and bet on the talent.
  8. Hugh2
    I suspect that any deal involving no top prospects is going to net you a return no better than what we've received the last few years. Lucas Sims and Luis Garcia weren't exactly difference makers last year. Could they make that kind of a move and it plays out better for them this time? it's certainly possible.
  9. Hugh2
    Also is it really Tanner Houcks fault? I'm not sure how he put us in a "bad spot" like he pitched bad and got hurt with malice. Also, what about Richard Fitts who hasn't quite lived up to expectations and got hurt, Crawford who got hurt, Now Dobbins got hurt, and Buehler who has not lived up to expectations. Maybe I missed interpreted the comment but I'm not really sure how Houck has put us in a bad spot. I also haven't 100% ruled out that Houck comes back and really helps us down the stretch, if not in the rotation then in the bullpen.
  10. Hugh2
    As good as Eovaldi is, a 35 year old pitcher with two TJS isn't exactly the type of risk I wanna bet on. He could easily be hurt this year or go down next. It would cost more, but I'd rather trade for a guy we would be interested in extended if it made sense. He's also on the rangers who are easily in the playoff hunt this year, he very well might not even be for sale.
  11. Hugh2
    I would be scanning the market for a good starting pitcher who has at least an extra year of control left. It's going to cost more and some people might be uncomfortable with that but it sets this team up nicely for the playoffs this year and for next year as well. Crochet/ Hypothetical Ace #2/ Giolito/ Bello/ put whoever you want here.
  12. Hugh2
    Not the first half MVP, but come back player of the year is definitely Story, and to think how bad he was for the first couple months (save the first two weeks). From June 1st he's had a .913 OPS. I do think he will have some regression in the second half, but as long as he's as good as he can be and not the black hole he was in May that's fine by me, especially if the defense still looks good. I knew Chapman was good, and I figured he was going to add value to this bullpen, but I never would have guessed he'd have this kind of resurgence and look like one of the top closers if not thee top in the league again.
  13. Hugh2
    I don’t see how Gio or Bello gets bumped Crochett hypothetical Ace Gio Bello I don’t care who you put here.
  14. Hugh2
    We literally just won 9 games in a row and we are still finding things to complain about. Sox looking like the best team in baseball lately.
  15. Hugh2
    I mean if I found a million dollars and someone offered me 2 million dollars for my car I'm not saying no because I already have a million dollars.
  16. Hugh2
    I haven't given up on Houck yet, I'm hoping his problem is more mechanical than talent. I'm also not convinced that his best position might still be in the bullpen opposed to starting.
  17. Hugh2
    BTV accepts. Duran/Arias/Sandlin for Joe Ryan
  18. Hugh2
    I've been wrong many times, but I doubt we ever see the 5'8" Yoshida at 1B
  19. Hugh2
    It’s not that I’m against an upgrade at 1b, I just feel it’s lower on the totem pole. but hey, I’ll jump on the Rafaela train with you any day.
  20. Hugh2
    Who says anything about platooning DH? no one is on this roster because they have to DH, except maybe Yoshida who has yet to take one at bat. DH, since Raffy left, has been the exact opposite of 1B, and Romy can play other positions as well, it's not like you're talking about having 4 guys on the roster for 4 spots. I'm also not 100% convinced that they're not trading from their outfield depth. THere's a decent chance they're trading one of Abreu or Duran and plugging Yoshida in left and rotating the DH the way they're doing it with Duran/Abreu/Rafaela/Anthony now. Look, we can argue all day long, I just don't agree that an upgrade at 1B is either necessary or that there's even a big upgrade available out there.
  21. Hugh2
    I would kindly disagree, and I believe I have addressed it. But to reiterate past points I have made I would prioritize starting pitching, relief pitching, and a 2nd catcher to split with Narvaez at the deadline. The Toro/Romy platoon at 1b has netted us a .965 OPS at 1B. If they're platooned right than Suarez is a downgrade. If regression comes into play then it's a marginal upgrade AT BEST. I'm sorry, I think people just get stuck on the long ball. Suarez swings hard, but the reality is I don't think he makes us that much better. Or at the veyr least, he does not make this team as better as getting pitching would. The team should buy pitching. The offense will be fine. Maybe get a catcher who is serviceable behind the plate who can hit, why not upgrade there? Wong is literally the worse offensive player in baseball this year so you'd think if you wanted to upgrade the offense you'd look there.
  22. Hugh2
    The Yankees and Dodgers get to beat up on crappy teams and pad their stats too. At least where finally doing that too now.
  23. Hugh2
    Are you talking about Eugenio Suarez? It's just odd that you think Toro is going to regress to the mean and not Suarez? who's had an OPS about .100 NORTH of his career average. Why should we believe he won't and Toro will? It's not like he's younger or anything. And his defense is not that great. And as I've pointed out the Toro/Romy platoon has performed well. Suarez is only an upgrade if those guys regress and Suarez does not.
  24. Hugh2
    We were 5th in MLB in OPS in June and have been 2nd in July. With guys getting healthy and youngsters growing and coming into their own I don't see the offense as first priority. Meanwhile, we've been in the bottom half of almost every pitching category. Pitching is more of an issue than hitting. I think this team is good, but I don't think they're so good that you empty the bank. So therefore you have limited bullets. I would spend them on pitching.
  25. Hugh2
    I don't think there's even anyone on the market who can play 1B who is going to give you more production than we've got already at 1B. In my opinion it's just wasting bullets.
×
×
  • Create New...