notin
-
Posts
52,022 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
44
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by notin
-
Remember after opening day when everyone wanted him gone?
-
The Sox need to identify some underrated pitching talent. While likely unaffordable anyway, they did miss out on Miles Mikolas this off-season. Mikolas was an underrated guy I was writing about back on BDC in my occasional "Hidden Gem" posts. (I'm not calling myself a scout here. "Hidden Gems" had more misses than hits, and calling Mikolas a hit is probably premature right now. But there are guys like him out there.)
-
Agreed. The Sox aren't moving Devers off third, errors or not. Where would Machado fit on? At this point, I'll take one and a half seasons of Bogaerts over a half season of Machado. ..
-
Betts brings to memory one heck of a player.
notin replied to dustcover's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
That be a bit lofty to put Betts in the same argument as Foxx and Williams, let alone Devers. Williams is considered one of the greatest pure hitters of all time, if not the best. Foxx might be the most underrated slugger in MLB history. We're talking about the greatest hitters in history. Is Betts really in that argument yet? -
Betts brings to memory one heck of a player.
notin replied to dustcover's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Dimaggio -
I'm sure Baltimore would love to cash in on Machado this summer. But they will have an exorbitant asking price. Likely a difficult one for the Sox to afford. ..
-
Right now, less ball Bradley means more Moreland. And right now, that is the right way to go. ...
-
Not if the Sox pay too many other players too much money. They have a big budget, but not an unlimited budget...
-
The future of this team is Betts, not Kimbrel. Every big contract added over the next couple of seasons makes it more likely Betts walks away when his time is due. ..
-
I doubt the Sox even add a closer. Kelly or Thornburg likely take the role with the other doing setup. Its too early to fill out th he rest of the names in the bullpen right now, but of the candidates are already here.
-
I'm sure you also remember Bernie Carbo's home run. And there was that guy whatsisname who hit one off the foul pole in game 6. I think that hit might have made its way into pop culture lore at some point...
-
True, the WebGem has become an ESPN staple. But historically, big hits have been revered more than big defensive plays. We all remember Bucky Dent's home run. But how many remember Lou Pinella's sun-blind stab of Jerry Remy's single to RF?
-
Certainly, depending on the play itself. But most fans identify with offense. Baseball cards have revolved around it for decades. Fantasy baseball has been built around it. And the stats are so identifiable and recognizable. Batting average and it's teminology is used to describe success rates of nearly any situation. Fielding percentage? Errors? not so much. Really the only time defense gets the bigger nod is the view of the Gold Glove over the Silver Slugger. But even then, Gold Gloves frequently carry controversy. You never hear about questionable choices for Silver Slugger...
-
Just because a play is routine for one player doesn't necessarily make it routine for another. And if you want to look at it that way, really what percentage of plate appearances - the overwhelming majority of which will result in outs for every player - really have the chance to severly impact the outcome? Especially from a guy batting eighth...
-
No. I am saying the successes and failures of Lowell, Middlebrooks and Sandoval are irrelevant when discussing the defense abilities of Devers. Actually, I did not mind the Iglesias trade as much as some. But - and I said this all over BDC at the time - I would have preferred to deal Middlebrooks. Granted, this would have severely modified the trade to the point where Chicago (who had not had a 3B since Joe Crede at the time) might not have been interested, and might have even cut Detroit out altogether. I can't fault Cherington there. For all I know, maybe he did offer Middlebrooks first...
-
I think the Sox might be better served to let him go for that reason. While he won't be looking at 7 years, and while closers and their fewer IP should age a bit better than starters, at some point the Sox need to learn a lesson from the signing of Price...
-
Well, some of that improvement in ERA could be attributable to the additions of Price, Kimbrel and Sale, too...
-
It certainly is a big part, although I am hesitant to say 80%.
-
Missing the relevance here? If anything, Middlebrooks is the cautionary tale. He was a fan favorite right out of the gate, but turned into a massive flop rather quickly. (But at least Devers doesn't have Middlebrooks' noticeable poor strike zone judgement. They are not the same player at the plate.) Regardless, that Sandoval and Middlebrooks were not good players doesn't make Devers a better defender. If anything, he looks like a hitter who is given defensive pass because of his bat, while other players who excel at their positions are crucified because of their bats. Defense is about the glove and the arm and using them to make plays. To date, that has not been Devers forte. On the bright side, even if he does move off third, he will still be a bat in the middle of the Sox lineup for 5 more years...
-
The only reason I liked the Price contract at all was because of the opt out clause, which, when you look at what Grienke got at his age, looked like a distinct possibility to be exercised. But given how Price has pitched since coming to Boston, both in terms of quality and frequency, and coupled with last year's free agent salaries, it looks all but assured Price will be in Boston for the full contract. Maybe at some point Price gets traded, but even then a huge chunk of that contract is still staying in Boston. Or an equally ugly one coming back in return. Or both...
-
The only reason to play Swihart anywhere at this point is to hope he hits well enough to be a marketable trade piece capable of getting a better return than what was already turned down for him this spring, whatever that was. But as long as the Sox are atop the AL East with one of the best records in baseball, it is not likely Swihart gets that type of chance...
-
Even if that was the best solution - which i doubt, as I'd rather have Bradley in CF than Nunez at 3B - Pedroia is still without a return date and there could be a lot of baseball between now and when that scenario is even possible...
-
Offense is more fun to watch and more easily understandable. Defense, especially in this "post-Fielding percentage and errors" era, is much tougher to quantify and harder to relate directly to wins. That doesn't mean defense is less important.
-
That logic turns in to "Let's sell low on Bradley." For a team with a few tradeable commodities as the Sox, that is a bad idea...
-
The general theme here is - if you can hit, you don't need to field your position well. But, according to the Vazquez and Bradley threads, if you can field your position extremely well, you still better hit. Players spend much more time in the field manning their positions and many make more plays than they get plate appearances. Yet fans seem to like having these defensive positions need to be governed by offensive output alone? Devers is not good at third. He might get better, but that doesn't mean he will ever be good. Really, first base or DH is probably in his future. (Maybe the Bradley detractors would not mind seeing Devers to DH and JD to LF, Benitendi to CF and Bradley to the bench? Not sure who mans third in that scenario. Maybe the Sox will just have to pitch everyone away...)
