Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

notin

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    54,649
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    53

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by notin

  1. I agree 100% here. With cp176? Yes I do. If we could get Díaz for our prospects, it’s a no-brainer. But that’s like trying to buy a Bentley with Monopoly money...
  2. I’d actually rather give up our prospects. Do we have anyone you’d consider untouchable? That said, the only way the Sox could get Diaz is if they also took Cano and probably one other bad contract as well. And for what Cano costs, the Sox could probably sign Kimbrel and Britton, which would be a much better move for every readon...
  3. Not sure why anyone would take in $120mill just to get Díaz, who will start making money himself one day as well. The Yankees could go sign Kimbrel and save $50mill+ instead...
  4. I thought that would be the one thing he was remembered for. Kevin Miller seems more forgotten for drawing the walk off Rivera...
  5. The Sox have some options here. They could spend heavy and go all in on Kimbrel and/or Eovaldi and take their best shot at repeating while the core is intact and before it breaks up and this team potentially crashes. Or be conservative and look for the lower cost, shorter term “value plays” that will enable extending some of the core players to keep the team competitive but less likely to win a title for a longer period...
  6. And for the last 50 years, it’s just $1 per year. I wonder who would freak out on a contract like that. If it was $29,999,995 for each of the first 10 years and then $1 recurring player options for the next 50 years....
  7. The only depth starter we have I have any faith in is Velasquez...
  8. The fear he might be a flash in the pan? Angels had a similar out-of-nowhere 30ish pitcher the year before named Blake Parker, a guy who had been up and down between MLB and MiLB for like 5 or 6 years. He had a good season in Anaheim. They named him closer. He flamed out fast. I think Brasier makes the team, but let’s not throw everything at him just yet...
  9. That actually is a pretty good call. Mueller might be about as underrated as it gets. The guy was an AL batting champion for the Sox, but who remembers that?
  10. In I remember Ankiel as pitcher his rookie year before all the psychological issues set in. On MLB Tonight one night, Tim Kurkjian actually said “If Rick Ankiel doesn’t cut it as a pitcher, he can still have a career as an outfielder because he’s such a good hitter.” How prophetic was that? Maybe Kurkjian needs to be in the Hall of Fame...
  11. You may not get the pitcher Kimbrel was for a lesser price, but you might get the pitcher he will be from here on for a lesser price...
  12. I don’t. I don’t think it’s fair to say relievers are inconsistent pitchers. To me that seems backwards. I would instead say that inconsistent pitchers are relievers. And those two statements are NOT the same thing...
  13. P Moncada was turned into Sale, so that money was well spent. If the Red Sox didn’t have Moncada, the White Sox likely would have insisted on Benintendi (reportedly their top choice) in that trade...
  14. This one could go any of 1,000 directions. But I’ll get the ball rolling with Greg Harris, who was a 33yo scrap heap pitcher for the Sox who pitched in 83 games, including 51 starts, over his best two year stretch with Boston. Tom Bolton was another name that crossed my mind right away, too...
  15. This is a tough call for me. Eovaldi would be more important going forward, but expecting 150-200IP from a guy whose thrown about 230 IP combined in the past 3 seasons does seem a little hopeful. Kimbrel seems like he’d be more important in 2019, but this rotation could have issues in 2020 and beyond once Sale and Porcello depart. Having (potentially) the most expensive closer in MLB history will cut into the Sox ability to fill those rotation spots while also retaining Bogaerts and/or Martinez...
  16. Noe Ramirez was a Sox draft pick who worked his way up through the system and Aro was an international free agent who did the same thing. You’re against that type of player? Heck even Machi and Mujica were both outstanding relievers before coming to Boston. Brasier is exactly the type of player you’re calling out. A career minor leaguer who crapped out of the Angels’ system and wound up in Japan because no one wanted him. But he had the type of radar gun readings DD likes, so that “ham and egger” got a shot and it worked out. It does happen sometimes. One has to wonder what issues he had that no one wanted him before. Since he still had a 98mph fastball at age 31, I’d guess he had some control problems at some point. One can only hope they don’t resurface...
  17. The Yankees should only consider trading for Bumgarner if the Giants are willing to also include a time machine that can go back to at least 2016. ...
  18. I like the idea of bringing Pomeranz back and spending bigger money on the bullpen. My only gripe with Pomeranz is the Sox rotaoisnpretty lefty-heavy to begin with, but that should not be a dealbreaker. Of course, Pomeranz might prefer an NL tea with a big ballpark to increase his numbers and get a bigger deal. If he does, adios Drew...
  19. So no more Ryan Brasier types?
  20. Well, the “not paying” part is really our interpretation of how this off-season is going to go. It doesn’t look like Henry is going to have an unlimited budget and it does look like Dombrowski is going to prioritize Eovaldi. I’ve always figured Eovaldi was Plan A and Kimbrel is Plan B, but it doesn’t look like both plans can happen simultaneously for purely financial reasons. That said, if we’re going to determine the cost of not having a closer, these rudimentary small sample size postseason-only techniques shouldn’t be how a closer gets evaluated. Per your argument, Familia can come into a game with the tying run in scoring position and no one out, induce 3 infield grounders that allow the run to score, and receive a label of not getting the job done. But Kimbrel can come in with a 2 run lead, walk the bases loaded, and escape because Andrew Benintendi made a catch he had no business making, and Kimbrel is clearly the guy. After all, he got the job done. If the Sox do sign a closer, there are numerous free agents available with experience, not just Kimbrel. Familia is one of the better ones and his 9ph fastball is certainly a trait Dombrowski has historically coveted in any pitcher (like Eovaldi and Brasier, for example). But the failures of his defense and manager back in 2015 don’t make him a “discount closer” destined to fail in the postseason...
  21. Based on what? Our minor league starters that are likely to make appearances in 2019 include no ranked prospects (which other teams will have) and no one in the top ten of the Sox own farm system, which has been universally rated as one of the worst systems in the game today. The rotation in Pawtucket figures to have two 30+ yo career minor leaguers and very, very little MLB experience, let alone success...
  22. It’s not a slavish devotion to Jamesian philosophy as much as it is a strong belief that Henry isn’t going to ignore economic realities, which he has shown in the very recent past he does not like to do. Not to mention the revised history that the Sox have ever gone into a season thinking “any schmuck can close” and been proven wrong. (The 2003 closer-by-committee experiment actually provided good results in ninth inning situations with only 3 lost leads in the ninth in a 54 game stretch, resulting in 2 losses). Bringing Kimbrel back is extremely likely to put a hole in the rotation, one only you think can be filled by Brian Johnson. The Sox seem to be prioritizing the rotation, and specifically Eovaldi. This very likely means they don’t want to pay Kimbrel...
  23. 3 blown saves and as you said, he was hurt by his defense. And in another of those blown saves, he faced 3 hitters and induced 3 groundouts. Is that blown save really his fault?
  24. So his 0.600 WHIP and 1 ER in the World Series 4 years ago is a disqualifier?
  25. Kela is a more likely option than LeClerc, since he is already making arbitration money and therefore more likely to be moved for less. Jimenez, Steckenrider and Garnett are all pre-arb and might not be as easy to acquire...
×
×
  • Create New...