Many- practically all.
I'm not arguing against targeted big spending. We don't win without Manny and maybe Lackey & JD.
Despite the feeling of JH turning miser, he did spend more than half of MLB after 2018, and what did it get him? We paid Devers almost 50% more than the previous record contract for the Sox (not a FA, I know.) We did spend rather largely on Story and Yoshida, and neither helped.
I went over the top 50 FA signings o fall time, a while back and found more than half we not a plus for the team or fell way short of expectations. It's a very hit or miss endeavor, but to me, it is necessary. As much as the Price signing did not work out as we hoped, we need an ace, and could not afford trading for one. I was all for it.
To be honest, I think we spent enough, this past winter. I wish we had added Scott, or even signed him over Buehler, but look at all our rotation injuries. It looks like a second major addition to the rotation was needed, even if Buehler does not work out.
I'm a tweener on this issue. As much as I want JH to spend more, and more and more, I can understand it's the American way to maximize profits. I also think there is a pride aspect to spending large, often. An owner/GM look better when they a team wins when not being a top 3-5 spender (just my opinion, there.)
I think we'd look like a sure playoff team had we signed Scott, and he's not really a top MLB FA signings- like Soto, Fried or Bregman were.
I see our team as being loaded with young and inexpensive talent, and we were rip for targeted big spending on our high need areas. To me, the closer and top set up roles were high on the priority list. We missed the boat, but I'm not complaining about how "little" we spent, this particular winter.