moonslav59
-
Posts
105,519 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
136
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by moonslav59
-
BTV does not allow trades between the same club.
-
Rosters are 26, now, but is it possible nobody would not select Groome and have to keep him on their 26 man roster all year?
-
I'm fine with keeping Mazza, but we should protect Bazardo. There are still plenty of scrubs to DFA in order to keep Bazardo.
-
YES, in a heartbeat. I clicked "like" on your trade.
-
I'd trade 5 Chathams for 1 Houck.
-
They certainly are far from perfect. The top 3 or 4 seem fine, but after that... meh.
-
I saw your trade on that site. It does seem more realistic than before they adjusted Snell's value upwards.
-
One of the reasons I'm not very high on Chatham. The Trade Values site has him as much more valuable than many other Sox prospects. 26 Downs 22 Casas 18 Dalbec 12 Mata 12 Duran 9 Jimenez 6 Yorke 6 Jordan 6 Lugo 6 Houck 5 Chatham
-
I think he meant in trade.
-
Great stuff, MVP!
-
Many players are streaky. JBJ's issue was that he started most seasons very slowly, so it's not as easily hidden from view. If someone starts out at 1.000, then hits .500 for a few months, people see .750> .740>.730... When someone starts at .500, we see .510>.520>.540...
-
I see your point. I'm not high on Chatham, so maybe I should have swapped those two. I could also see Arauz, Grullon, Brewer, Valdez or Aybar gone, instead. The last 5-10 guys are pretty interchangeable.
-
Mazza or Chatham, but he can't be place on the IL until the offseason is over, so someone will have to be exposed to waivers until we add him (and maybe ERod) to the IL.
-
True. He did start out hot his first call-up. He was over a 1.000 OPS at game 23 and went .693 the last 35 games. In 2018, he was up and down all year: .740 the first 40 games .675 in the middle 40 games .779 the last 41 games (Want to see how one game can skew the numbers? Game 81, Devers went 5 for 5, so if I shift that one game to the middle group: .743 middle 41 games and .709 the last 40.) In 2019, Devers was at .690 after 25 games. He hit .897 his next 41 games and 1.115 the next 60 games before finishing with .693 the last 30 games. 2020: .556 after 20 games .907 the last 37
-
My guess is most players with good numbers in such small sample sizes can point to a great very short stretch. Many "bad" players can point to one bad stretch- sometimes just a game or two.
-
2021 Red Sox 40 Man Roster (assuming no trades & Pedey DFA) SP Sale (IL to start season), FA, ERod, Eovaldi, FA, Pivetta, Houck Seabold, Weber, Mata, Groome RP FA, FA, Barnes, Brasier, DHern, Taylor, Brewer Valdez, Bazardo, Aybar C Vazquez, Plawecki Wong, Grullon 1B Dalbec, Chavis 2B FA, Arroyo, Munoz Arauz 3B Devers SS Bogaerts Chatham* (see below) LF Benintendi CF FA Duran, Rosario RF Verdugo DH Martinez Gone from current roster: Brice Walden Hall Springs Stock Wilson Hart Mazza* (or Chatham)
-
...and the Tito reunion.
-
Seems like a hole in their system.
-
I actually submitted a trade on Trade Values for Polanco, Rodriguez & Musgrove. (I offered up Duran, Chavis and Chatham. I seriously doubt Pitt would say yes, but the site accepted it.)
-
Who leaves on top? Jim Brown and nobody else.
-
It's not so much about the current numbers as the owner's willingness to spend in a period of extreme economic unknowns and instability. I have no clue what Seattle's spending budget might be, this winter, but I'm thinking we may spend between $25-45M (per year rate) by the trade deadline.
-
Theo left both teams in similar situations. He got both teams their much needed and long-awaited ring(s). He left both teams with some salary & roster issues. I'm not bashin' the guy. He's the G.O.A.T.!
-
We are not trading prospects for 1 year players. The Astros would not do this deal, either. We may not see any blockbuster trades or signings- just a bunch of midlevel and under-the-radar moves that build our roster depth and set us on the way to competitiveness. We make one splash deal in hopes of luring fans back, but I doubt we'll trade 10 years of 2 young player's control for 1 year control of anyone, let alone a SS, the one position we are set.
-
Good news for teams looking to spend, this winter. Supply & Demand.
-
I could have been more specific.
