Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    103,768
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    128

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. I brought up Kike's CF and 2B numbers when we signed him, but very few agreed he should be our FT CF'er.
  2. Wow, Duran at -6 in what? 200 innings?
  3. I've talked about this issue many times before. I was no little fan, but I can't think leaving Pedro in a game can be an undebatable offense. Again, I'm not claiming I was right, but at the time of the choice, it was not a 100% clear what was the right thing to do, and if that bloop hit was a pop up, this wouldn't even be talked about. It wouldn't be on your list.
  4. LOL. It's what softy did.
  5. Totally false. It was always you who insulted me first. 100%. You think calling a position insane, dumb or silly is a personal insult. It's not.
  6. I saw that afterwards, and again, I'm not saying I was right, but I do think that point is up for debate. Pedro at 75% was better than anyone else the Sox had available. Maybe you can say he was at 64.7% at that moment, but that is something that can be further discussed. Had you said Ted Williams is the best Sox hitter of all time, I'd have said that was not up for debate, but you chose some real iffy claims, instead,
  7. He once bashed me for suggesting we move Papi down to the 6 slot during that down year. This was after he had suggested we demote him to AAA to "work on his swing."
  8. I was glad Pedro stayed in, at the time, so I'd be hypocritical to throw stones at Little on that. I'm not saying I was right. Hindsight shows I was not, but Pedro at 75% was better than anyone else, and we were beat by a bloop hit, so there is that to create a discussion.
  9. I misread the Buckner line. I agree with you, but some would debate this. Yes, nopes mean it's debatable.
  10. I never thought Mayer would drop to us. I was expecting and wishing for a college talent, but getting Mayer was nothing short of amazing. I do think it was a no-brainer, but Bloom should still get credit.
  11. I remember softlaw very well. I think I agreed with him on 2 issues over the years and years we both were on that site. He threw a lot of insults and was big on saying everyone was a Theo apologist. I guess he was right on that, since we had to continually defend Theo against his Theo-bashing. Was he the guy who also said "pink hats" and "pink glasses" all the time?
  12. I say: That makes total sense. lol You say: Douchebag _________________________ I say: No, I get your lame position very clearly. I didn't assume or mistake what you said and meant. Yes, both bear responsibility. I'm glad you saw the light. You honestly think Cora is doing or trying nothing or maybe just not doing enough? He's just "letting it happen?" Like if he spent 24/7 with these guys on D, they'd be any better? These guys suck on D. They always have. It might take years to turn them into just average. Just blame Bloom. You are much better at that. You say: You really are a dimwit. ______________________ This is who you are. It's not some rarity or once a month type of post. It's who you are.
  13. Yes, I have called people names. A lot of times, it was you. I admit that and regret it. You don't. I have never done that over someone criticizing my position on something, and as far as I know, always after being personally insulted first. You make personal insults very very often over just a criticism of a position you hold. I admit I push buttons when criticizing some positions I consider silly or outlandish. Maybe that warrants personal insults hurled my way. That doesn't take away from the fact that you are the master of hurling personal insults. That does not imply others don't do it, including myself, but you are the king.
  14. 1. I agree, but somone 150years old might say Cy Young or even the Babe. 2. Agreed, but it's not a skill. 3. Agreed, but nonSox fans would disagree. 4. I was calm with Barnes for a couple months. 5. I disagree. 6. Nope. 7. Nope. 8. You may have found #2. 9. Nope. 10. Nope.
  15. Criticizing positions are not personal insults. Calling someone a D-Bag or worse for saying your position is silly or illogical is what you have mastered.
  16. We don't have to keep discussing it, but it's something to find an issue beyond debate.
  17. Oh, I'm far from giving upon Casas, but he needs to show improvement before he gets called up, which I think he will do. How much improvement and how quickly will determine his call-up date. Devers has 2 years, after this. Moving Devers to 1B for 2022 should not e affected by the ETA of Casas.
  18. Mets claim Brad Hand. Starlin Castro released.
  19. Maybe the light bulb has already been turned on. I really like Casas, but he needs to hit better than .785 in AA to be considered a starter in 2022 or even 2023.
  20. Soxprospects.com has these projections: 2023 C Wong 1B Casas 2B Downs 3B Devers SS Bogey LF Verdugo CF Duran RF Renfroe DH Dalbec SP Sale, Whitlock, Pivetta, Bello, Seabold, Groome RP Houck, Barnes, Taylor, DHern, Valdez, Rios, Winckowski, Feltman, Bazardo 2024 Wong Casas Yorke Downs (SS) Bogey (3B) Verdugo Duran Jimenez Dalbec Same SP Same RP (replace Rios with Mata/Ward/Murphy)
  21. When you see other teams fast-tracking these studs and them starting off on fire, you start thinking maybe some near studs can do the same. I fall into the trap, too. (Not saying Mayer is a near stud. He could be a stud.)
  22. Hey, you found a position we all agree on! I thought that could never be done!
  23. ERA+ 117 HOU 116 NYY 112 OAK 108 BOS 108 TBR ERA- 87 HOU 89 TBR 89 NYY 92 BOS 96 OAK Maybe it's closer than plain old ERA shows it is.
  24. Isn't 1B more obvious? Dalbec has not improved his already bad defense at 1B over a nrea full season of play. But then, are we going to trade Dalbec and Duran? The only 2 min wage players with a chance to play a lot, next season?
  25. Innings in the OF: A- RF 261 A+ CF 424 AA CF 671 AAA CF 338 AAA RF 54 AAA LF 17 That's over 1400 in CF and over 300 in RF/LF. OF'ers have been known to get 1400 innings in one season (rare but true), and 1200-1300 is common. I still think Duran can grow into a decent to plus defender.
×
×
  • Create New...