Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    105,262
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    134

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. I know, right? I just noticed that trend.
  2. too bad JD plays for the O’s- cause we got only chokes on our team.
  3. I love how people think it’s as easy as the manager just telling the guys to loosen up.
  4. Again, I never said Schwarber was a clearly better choice. I just pointed out the 230 point better split. That equates to one more time on base per 4 ABs. I guess he might make two errors, tonight. I like having a better D, and Dugo is way better, but it’s doubtful LF defense comes into play as much as 4 ABs.
  5. He should have never told the team to choke.
  6. Is Eovaldi a Sox player?
  7. It looks that way, and the O’s have no reason to be “tight.” I happen to think trends can change on a dime and expect it to happen, soon. I’ve been wrong before, but I’m sticking with the ship- sink or float.
  8. Good thing he seems to be able to bounce out of funks in a big way.
  9. Devers is really bottoming out.
  10. Where did I ever say those games were equally pressure packed. Some were certainly very pressure-packed, and we won. If we win tonight, does the recen y bias project 4 more in a row?
  11. Let’s get off to a big start!
  12. Agreed, but I don’t want a .556 hitter in the line up when our offense is struggling and Schwarber wins your regency bias point.
  13. These games listed are from the last month.
  14. im not saying I like the one game nonsense, but I do think STL is better than ATL.
  15. No, but the goalposts are trying to be moved.
  16. Can’t it be a sac fly from 2nd to 3rd?
  17. The choice certainly helps the defense, although not in one of the most important positions. (Watch Dugo make a couple game saving plays!) It might be enough to outweigh the splits: Schwarber v L .794 (2021) Verdugo v L .556 (2021) I trust Cora, and having Schwarbs to PH might be helpful, too. BTW, we face a lefty, tomorrow and in the first Nats game, too.
  18. Today's big games: BOS (Eovalid) @ BAL (Lowther) If we can't beat Lowther, we are in deep doo-doo. NYY (Cole) @ TOR (Berrios) I can't bring myself to root for the Yanks, so I'll call it hoping TOR loses. A's (Go Frankie Montas) @ SEA (Gilbert) This may be the M's toughest remaining game on their schedule.
  19. Many games have several what if moments that might have flipped the result. I'm sure the M's have had a few, but with their significant negative run differential, my guess is they have won a bunch more of those what ifs than they lost. The Jays have likely lost more than their fair share.
  20. I don't disagree, but the third place team may have a better record and tougher schedule than one division winner. The Sox are just one game behind the CWS. The two WC teams in the NL blow away the Braves.
  21. Scratching my head on Dugo.
  22. I have been very clear in stating that only if all other things are equal- like OBP and OPS, then what kind of outs are not much of a factor. If Dalbec K's 200 times in 600 PAs and hits into 4 DPs. I'm not sure there is much difference from another player with the same OBP and OPS K'ing 150 times, hitting into 8-10 DPs, but in those 50 PAs where he put the ball in play for an out, it somehow helped the team by more than his extra DPs hurt the team. How many Sac flies and grounders that move the runner over a base lead to runs? And, we're talking maybe 50-70 PAs, only. Of course, it likely makes a difference, but how much? Does that difference make up for 4-6+ more DPs over a season?
×
×
  • Create New...