Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

jad

Verified Member
  • Posts

    4,659
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by jad

  1. I am now seriously doubting your ability to read a simple English sentence. Where did I argue for not giving him an extension?
  2. There is no way Mookie was 'unaffordable', nor was Bogaerts, JT, nor anyone else. It's just that JH/Bloom did not want to pay them, thinking, apparently, they could be replaced with, say, .180 hitters for a mere $200 million.
  3. Yeah, not trading Mookie would have really sucked.
  4. Yoshida is leading the team in BA; Story is hitting around .180. Yoshida has an OPS of .793. Story is in the 500s. There is really no comparison between these two players. It reminds me of the antipathy of RS fans for A. Gonzales, also a .290s hitter who did exactly for the RS what he did everywhere he played.
  5. And that's why we gave a .180 hitter the big bucks, those that were left over from profits.
  6. Don't change.
  7. Trade him for Stanton?
  8. As I said. You're a Bloom fan. (What I mean by this is that you judge players as machines that can be evaluated by metrics, many of which claim to be quantitative. I look at them as human beings I get attached to and enjoy watching play. )
  9. Wow. I guess the old adage about 'the ball will find you' is true.
  10. In other words, you're a Bloom fan. Personally, I'd rather be watching generational talents like Betts every night, and productive players I've grown to like like Bogaerts, Benintendi, Vasquez, etc, rather than presumed bargains like Story and Kluber. If that means a billionaire spends more of his money, I don't give a crap.
  11. All? Oh. I see what you mean. I don't think all his decisions were bad, of course--he was well-dressed, polite to reporters, and doubtless brought good people into the organization we've never heard of. The decisions I'm thinking of are the obv. ones: getting rid of popular players, signing players with questionable health and legal issues apparently in hopes of getting a bargain, gobbledegook on what the 'plan' was, etc.
  12. The problem is we have no idea what Henry "mandated." Thus, we use the name "Bloom" to refer to all of the personnel decisions made since he got here. I don't care who made those decisions as long as the RS now essentially have stated that they were bad ones.
  13. You believe a $200 million player can hit over .180?
  14. Reset!!!!
  15. OK. RS need better defense, base-running and 'situational hitting'. I don't think anyone here or in RS organization disagrees. That's the easy part. Now: exactly which available players do you wish to get who will do that and how will you get them? And which players will you get rid of because they are thought not to be doing that?
  16. Maybe. Reyes is a career .260 hitter. Story and Urias are right now hitting .183. Doesn't sound like a good hitting middle infield to me. Even Story's stellar defense can't make up for this.
  17. Maybe you should explain that, since most English speakers would see that these are two completely different statements.
  18. Sure he can! He cut salary, got cheap players (Verdugo/Story) for expensive ones (Betts/Bogaerts), put an entertaining product on the field (who doesn't love a game with two dozen runs?), and even got the team over .500. His boss made tons of money. What's the problem?
  19. Totally! I also think LAD will agree to trade Betts for Verdugo, and SD will trade Bogaerts for Story.
  20. Just turned the game on to watch the run-down. Yikes.
  21. Has the RS season deteriorated to such a point that we are now discussing (in part, unironically it seems) the issue of whether having better players makes for a better team?
  22. When I saw Devers in AA, I was impressed most by his fielding (he 'looked' like a major-leaguer, which not all players in AA do). I didn't know he had a reputation as a hitter. So I'm fine with his fielding. [And btw, Moon, you know perffectly well that no one here gives a cr*p about what anyone else says, will say, or has said in the past. Why would they?]
  23. Oh right. We had this discussion a month ago (or someone did). I was arguing the reverse of what I just posted, right? THus making it impossible to determine whether either of us is being ironic.
  24. I'd be happy to! ... (What did I do?)
×
×
  • Create New...