The plight of Oakland does not refute the principles of Moneyball, since there is nothing in the book to say that these principles can make up for more than a 2x difference in payroll. It's going to be difficult to compete with a team that spends more than twice what you do no matter how foolishly that team may use its resources (and of course, there are teams that do not spend wisely--shocking as of course this may seem to contributors on this board!)
Maybe. But why would anyone assume they took the care required to vet cheap players like this, when they obviously didn't bother on the expensive ones they acquired over the winter?
Only the famous play last year where, after misplaying a ball, he refused to hustle after it because (employing the logic of Ray Lewis, I suppose) it might hurt his street cred.
Once again, my rapier-like wit is blunted by the whetstone of the world. The RS will be turning their season around due to the weather preventing them from losing. (Or maybe it's your rapier-like wit blunted on the stone of my mind.)
I have to disagree with that: he hit well, and fielded well. What more was he supposed to do? If he didn't 'fit', that's on the other players who didn't perform as well, not on him. (Now a .180 hitting Peguero, THERE's a great fit for the 2015 Sox!)
Yeah, you're right. My bad. Sorry. Must be the frustrations of the season; I keep wondering if Gary Geiger is still out there, or if Don Buddin is going to do something interesting at short.
$200/mil (Is that their payroll?) a year to "set things up" for two years down the road?? That may work, since anything can happen (e.g., 2013), but it doesn't sound like a coherent strategy to me. Exactly where is all this cash going that's supposed to pay dividends down the road?
I don't get that. Nava may be done, but at least he has shown over the past few years that he is or was once capable of hitting. Peguero has proven with several years of very consistent performances that he is not. What's the point? Play Bradley. Play anyone.
But if "underperformance" is found across the board, isn't that a condemnation of the manager/coaching staff or perhaps the FO who constructed the team under the delusion or hope that everything would go right (e.g., 2013)?
It's not that they're not coming through in RISP, it's that so many are hitting badly period: Ortiz, Nava, Swihart, Bradley, [Craig], Napoli, Victorino--all well below what was expected.