Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    54,672
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    75

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Something like starting Denny Galehouse in the playoff game, huh?
  2. Now that is a great sounding team name.
  3. He must have. And I think this highlights one of the things that analytics can't capture. Cash had to make a gut decision on which history to rely on.
  4. You should check out Alex Speier's tweets from the game. He had some in-game analytics on Snell, swing-and-miss rate and exit velocity stuff, indicating that Snell was really having an extraordinarily game. In spite of which, Speier said that pulling Snell was defensible. But he thought that replacing him with Anderson did not make sense.
  5. In this particular situation, he went with a struggling reliever over his ace starter who was at only 73 pitches, had terrific stuff and had thus far mowed down the hitters who were due up. It seems like a case of analytics defying sense.
  6. His numbers in his 6 previous appearances were somewhat indicative.
  7. Baseball-Reference shows Win Probability, which I can wrap my head around a lot better. When Cash pulled Snell, the Dodgers had a 42% chance of winning. Mookie's double: increased to 56%. Wild pitch, run scores: increased to 65%. Seager's grounder, run scores: increased to 73%. So there was a hefty 31% change on those two at-bats.
  8. Win expectancy is an extremely difficult concept for me to wrap my head around. Would you be able to do a little analysis of it as it pertains to this situation?
  9. I just read that Anderson said after the game he was fatigued from the heavy postseason workload. That makes the decision look even worse.
  10. Bob Stanley, the most tragic figure in Red Sox history, in my books at least.
  11. "If he didn't" just isn't valid.
  12. "If he doesn't have that WP" is kind of like that joke, "other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, did you enjoy the play?"
  13. Pretty sure those numbers are regular season only, and don't include the 5 World Series PA's which resulted in 3 K's, a groundout and a walk. Not really scary enough numbers or a large enough sample to influence the move, IMHO.
  14. Cash said it was the pre-game plan not to let him face the lineup a third time, did he not?
  15. The hit by Posada may have been a flare - the issue is that it was the 4th hit in a row - and it came after a ROCKET by Matsui.
  16. That's true, but Anderson had been struggling badly, giving up runs in 6 straight appearances, probably showing signs of being worn down. You wonder why Cash gave so little weight to that side of it.
  17. Pedro gave the 'heavenward thank you' as he was coming off the mound after the 7th. He thought he was done. He said so later.
  18. Wow, you're more old school than I realized!
  19. Could be either, or some of both, right? A veritable spectrum of possibilities.
  20. To be fair, in Game 2 of this World Series, Snell was also cruising for 4.2 innings, and then failed to retire any of the next 4 hitters. Pitchers can seem to be cruising sometimes and suddenly lose it. I don't envy managers having to make those decisions.
  21. And Malcolm Butler's name actually appears twice on the list of questionable Super Bowl decisions...
  22. In-game tweet by Jon Heyman: "Dodgers ecstatic when Snell came out. That's something numbers don't show - other team doing backflips."
×
×
  • Create New...