I'll go with the common sense test, myself.
Crochet pitched great, Giolito pitched like crap, pitching wins and losses mean jack, because it's a team game.
And you can figure that out just by looking at box scores.
That's easy to say but not so easy to put into practice, mainly because it's such a team game.
Last night Giolito pitched horribly but the team got him off the hook for the loss. So his horrible pitching didn't actually lead to an L. Whereas Crochet's excellent performance in the previous game did lead to an L. So there you have 2 games in a row where the performance and the result didn't match up. And those are just the last 2 games played by our team.
All I'm really saying is, errors may be overrated, as has been discussed at length here, but the Red Sox leading in baseball in errors this year, and a close second last year, is still a bad thing.
This is a dumb argument. Making errors on basic plays is still bad, always has been and always will be. Range is a totally separate thing. And getting charged with an error on a really tough play is a mistake by the scorer. This is all Captain Obvious material.
To say that errors are just opinion is oversimplifying IMO. Most of them are obvious, and the bad calls should even out. And they do review the calls and change some of them.
But the Red Sox having the most errors and worst fielding pct. in MLB is probably not a good thing.
Range metrics are obviously very important, but the impact of muffing simple plays (for a major leaguer) shouldn't be dismissed either, IMHO .
You do have to wonder if the Driveline hitting philosophy even acknowledges there's such a thing as "situational hitting" or if they think every at-bat should be treated the same.
Not that it matters at this point, but if Sale hadn't been traded and if he pitched as well for the Sox as he did for the Braves, he'd be with us this year because of the vesting option in his contract.