As far as Brasier and Ort are concerned, even if they're halfway useful, they're fungible. And the Red Sox have room under the tax cap if they need to acquire another reliever. It's impossible to make a case for either of them as valuable assets.
In any case, as at least one other poster has pointed out, it does seem a little curious that a team that's supposedly building toward the future would leave unprotected two young pitchers like Song and Ward in favor of who they kept.
Philly can restrict Song to low leverage situations. They can phantom DL him. They can return him, right?
And in any case they're a pretty safe bet to make the playoffs.
Edit re phantom DL: he has to be on the active roster for 90 days. But that's only half the season.
The Rule 5 Draft was on Dec. 7. It wasn't until Feb. 22 that the Phillies announced he would be able to pitch in 2023.
Unless we hear anything further, it certainly seems like the Red Sox didn't know at the time.
And when exactly have you seen another draftee with his circumstances? The Red Sox knew there could be a waiting period of several years when they drafted him.
I think a bit too much is being made of Song's period of inactivity. He's only 25 and presumably 100% healthy.
Whitlock didn't pitch for 1.5 seasons because of TJ surgery and pitched brilliantly in 2021.
So what happens if the Phillies do put Song on the team, but at some point he really starts to struggle and they decide that's enough? Do they just return him to the Red Sox, no harm, no foul?