Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    54,653

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    75

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Bellhorn04
    Look at the grades - they're all over the place. Too funny. Nobody has a clue, like I said.
  2. Bellhorn04
    Seriously? Our starting rotation is slightly diminished from a day ago.
  3. Bellhorn04
    I have no f***ing idea. And I can tell nobody else does either because of the massive disparities of opinions I've read. There is no consensus among the fans, that's for sure. But the scribes seem to think the Red Sox did well.
  4. Bellhorn04
    Not a surprise.
  5. Bellhorn04
    But how do they replace a guy like Lester on the cheap? Can't be done. I don't doubt that a lot of moves are coming. But they are taking a pretty big risk letting Lester go. Could haunt them for the next 3-4 years.
  6. Bellhorn04
    He killed his value this year - horrible numbers, and seemingly confirmation of a lousy work ethic and attitude.
  7. Bellhorn04
    There's also talk that Lackey could be dealt, of course.
  8. Bellhorn04
    There's also a vesting option for 2017 which kicks in at $25 million unless he has a left shoulder injury in 2016. That would make it a 9 year deal.
  9. Bellhorn04
    Lester has been scratched from tomorrow's start. We may have seen him pitch for the last time as a member of the Red Sox.
  10. Bellhorn04
    Ahh, fiddlesticks! I knew you were going to crush us with the Edgar numbers. The more I look at it, the more of an injustice it seems that Edgar isn't in the HOF. Are there PED suspicions with Edgar?
  11. Bellhorn04
    Ortiz and Martinez have similar averages, but Ortiz's counting numbers are vastly better. And I have to disagree that Martinez was a 'much better player'.
  12. Bellhorn04
    This is great stuff.
  13. Bellhorn04
    It's the same one you've posted on before, Fred. I don't think it's actually called Dirt Dogs though. There is a page called Dirt Dogs in the Globe Sports Section, but what's on that page is headlines and pictures and cartoons and links to other Sox coverage.
  14. Bellhorn04
    Joyce gets green lighted on a 3-0 pitch, against a guy with 5 walks in the 4th inning, and DP's.
  15. Bellhorn04
    Good one, I like it. The Boston Globe Sox forum is quite entertaining these days, I have to say.
  16. Bellhorn04
    If the Sox can't get Stanton maybe they should go after Tulo.
  17. Bellhorn04
    Nice work, Fred. Peavy is a career 14-2 vs. the Dodgers with a 2.21 ERA.
  18. Bellhorn04
    Pretty much. The laws of business are on our side.
  19. Bellhorn04
    None that I've heard. I'm just saying, IMO, Henry and Lucchino, as good businessmen, know that in this market you can't keep putting s*** on the field and making money at it. So they will be looking to improve the team. Unless/until they get tired of it, and if that happens, I think they'd be ready to sell.
  20. Bellhorn04
    Yes, I think they are good businessmen, and I think they know they have to upgrade the team. Or sell it.
  21. Bellhorn04
    I'm only an outside observer, but Girardi seems like he must be doing a pretty good job to me.
  22. Bellhorn04
    Peavy will be traded. Gomes must be traded too, even if it's for balls, bats etc.
  23. Bellhorn04
    I have a feeling the Sox are serious about Hamels. I'm not saying I like it, but I can see the logic there.
  24. Bellhorn04
    If Gammons's report is accurate that the Sox had a chance to ink Lester for $105 million, then I'd say they definitely f***ed up royally.
  25. Bellhorn04
    As far as spending is concerned, the 2014 payroll is just as high as the 2013 payroll, and it's still one of the top 3 or 4 in baseball, lagging behind only the Yanks and Dodgers, really. The spending was there for 2014...the return on spending was not.
×
×
  • Create New...