Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    54,653
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    75

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Yes, they have certainly been accumulating a stockpile of prospects.
  2. Statements like that from Farrell seem a little comical to me. Somebody should ask John how he plans to deploy all those outfielders.
  3. Yes, I think that's what the history shows. Like I say, I understand it. It's a business and Red Sox fans are not the most patient constituency.
  4. What I mean is, I don't think they've ever really had a 'consistent philosophy' under this ownership - not for very long anyway.
  5. It's a conflicted philosophy, because no matter what they say, they always have an eye on attendance and ratings too. Personally the lack of consistency doesn't bother me too much. I expect it.
  6. Latest rumors on Lester: Cubs offer is 6 years 144 million Red Sox offer is 6 years 138 million
  7. No way in hell does that happen.
  8. I think the 3-4-5 would more likely be Ortiz-Hanley-Panda. Positions for Bogaerts and Castillo would depend on performance. I'd really love to see Napoli in that 6 slot.
  9. Nava's defence also had a big improvement according to the metrics.
  10. Nava is not a 'rather crappy starter' at all. In 113 games last year he had a 3.3 WAR per B-R and 2.6 per FanGraphs. Well above average.
  11. Ha...Nava will be with the Sox or some other MLB team...when will you learn not to write him off.
  12. FWIW this Jake Wesley kid is now tweeting some promising stuff about Lester...this kid apparently knows someone with the Red Sox.
  13. Maybe they trade Napoli and Hanley goes to 1B. There are enough scenarios to make your head spin. I'm sure they have a master plan all laid out.
  14. They gave him a starting price, sure, but it's been widely expected that he would get 130-150 million.
  15. Not necessarily. Pujols and Cano got $240 million. It all depends on his numbers and whether salaries ever do stabilize or if they climb some more. Right now the money is flowing in.
  16. He is. It's the team options for 2016 and 2017 that are at $10 million per.
  17. The chatter seems to be more like 8 million a year for Miller.
  18. 5 @ 19 doesn't strike me as nuts anymore, the way contracts are going.
  19. You might be a little too demanding. Only 8 pitchers in all MLB reached 220 IP this year.
  20. Hopefully you're right. I was about to say that we don't know enough to judge whether the offer they made Lester was dumb or smart. If it was 5/100, that's dumb. If it was 6/150, that's also dumb. But if it was 6/126, that seems about right - and as you say, that wouldn't be their final number. We also don't know what else was said when they met, about where things go from there.
  21. What approach do you think they should have used?
  22. Hey UN, welcome back. I agree about Castillo not being expensive, but I'd be pretty surprised to see them sign him and trade him right away.
  23. Price is a perfect example. The package you get in return depends a lot on circumstances.
  24. And the Marlins would have him for 5 years for 125 million (depending on the structure) so it makes sense for them too. Of course they're carrying a ton of risk those 5 years (which could be mitigated by insurance?)
  25. It also seems like it's what the Marlins had to do.
×
×
  • Create New...