Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    54,662
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    75

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. On the RH bat thing, here's what might be the most telling 2024 split: Red Sox LHB at Fenway .775 Red Sox RHB at Fenway .698
  2. The only good idea in this area is to accept the way it is (controlled by greedy SOBs) and spend your energy elsewhere. 😇
  3. Which is a blatantly circular argument. Henry obviously wouldn't have brought DD in unless it was to go for a title and spend. Let's put the blame where it really belongs - on the pale, mercurial fellow, JH.
  4. Any talk on that Twins site about how they're the Yankees' whipping boys?
  5. Was the Bogaerts extension good or bad? I have to go with good. They got 3 good years pretty cheap, and it's hard to say the opt out has hurt us. I was fine with the Eovaldi extension. Nate has proven he's great when healthy, with health being a constant concern. Many of us lamented that we didn't keep him. The Sale extension has been beaten to death, of course.
  6. An interesting discussion would be "Who are the best CBOs in baseball and why?" Right away I think you'd have to divide them into 2 groups: CBOs with fat budgets and CBOs with tight budgets.
  7. It's really hard to repeat in MLB, seemingly harder all the time. Hasn't happened since 2000. In 2019 we experienced some of the reasons why that is. IMHO.
  8. Or for what Henry was offering. Dave has never been shy about offering top of the market money for elite talent, after all.
  9. Some things get changed and never come back. That's one of them.
  10. When those Sunday double headers get rained out, boy, you've really got problems. I don't think anyone would agree to that idea, frankly.
  11. One thing about Dombrowski is you don't get very many mystery moves. His moves are almost always self-explanatory.
  12. Yeah, it's just never as simple as we'd like it to be. I think he did an excellent job given the mandate most of us assume he had.
  13. There's really nothing wrong with having more than one #2. #2s might way the way to go, really. Plus a stronger bullpen, obviously.
  14. Guys you would have to consider no-doubt trade material and having some real market value: Abreu Hamilton Grissom Yoshida (would have to be plus money or talent, obviously) Prospects not in the Fab Four (Meidroth?)
  15. It seems like Anthony has risen so quickly that he's almost a proven commodity beyond any of those prospects we traded with the possible exception of Hanley. Personally I think we should just sign a starting pitcher. I don't think it's necessary to trade any of the Fab Four. Plus with the way they've been promoting the kids, and with all their other recent PR gaffes, I'm not sure they're even considering it.
  16. The available-for-money-only Jack Flaherty looked fairly ace-like last night. Of course he could be the next Montgomery, too.
  17. Rumor had it the Red Sox weren't really interested in Montgomery because they didn't think highly of his stuff.
×
×
  • Create New...