Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    54,666
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    75

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. The only current/former MLB pitcher I would step in against is Tim Wakefield. I might not connect with anything but at least I wouldn't get killed.
  2. I said Vaz exceeded expectations. I think that's a fair statement. Holt only had 164 PA's this year. Pretty short sample. Plus the concussion/vertigo.
  3. Holt shouldn't be included. Vazquez exceeded expectations in 2017. Moreland probably exceeded expectations in 2017. Devers possibly exceeded expectations in 2017. I am picking cherries and coating them with sugar and they are quite tasty.
  4. With regard to the hitting declines, you may have to consider the possibility that the true outlier season was 2016. Some of these same hitters had big increases from 2015 to 2016.
  5. That's fair...increasing the probability is all you can ask.
  6. LOL nope, I wouldn't bet a quarter on a baseball prediction.
  7. I agree, the final verdict on JF's 2017 performance is not in yet.
  8. Larry really has it in for DD.
  9. Congratulations!
  10. Jeezus, no eephus pitches...Spaceman Lee throwing one to Tony Perez in 1975 Game 7 was a big reason we lost the Series.
  11. What are you saying?
  12. -No one knows what caused the hitting declines. I don't know on what basis these could be blamed on the manager. -Rick Porcello won a Cy Young, yes, but has generally been a 4+ ERA pitcher. Porcello is on Ben. -Wright can be pinned on Farrell, sure, but I have no idea what he had to do with Thornburg's injury.
  13. Hanley is quite capable of performing on the big stage, I have no doubt about that.
  14. Station13 comes up with some funny s*** on the game threads.
  15. With Porcello or Fister I think you're basically rolling the dice. They might pitch 7 innings of 1 run ball or they might give up 4 in the first.
  16. You may be right. Some of my thinking is based on the principle that the pitching and defense have a large advantage over the offense which dictates that only about 9 runs are going to be scored in a game. Therefore we essentially know in advance that the heavy majority of pitches are not going to lead to any runs.
  17. Statistically Porcello and Fister have been pretty close. At this point I'd probably rather have Fister start than Porcello. But that's probably based mostly on gut feelings and the Recency Effect.
  18. July/11, so Theo's.
  19. I agree with that. I think Ben also has to take some negative responsibility for leaving behind a pretty horrible pitching staff and some bad contracts. But he also left behind a lot of good pieces to be sure.
  20. Certainly one could argue that every single pitch in a baseball game contributes to the outcome. I understand that reasoning but I don't fully accept it. Historical facts show that in a major league baseball game the 2 teams will score about 9 runs on average. That's the way the way the game is set up. So nothing that leads to runs will happen on most of the 300 pitches or so thrown in the game. That means that there are only a limited number of pitches that actually impact the outcome of the game. The statements you referenced - 'Farrell cost us the game by leaving a pitcher in too long' or 'Beni's boneheaded running cost us that game' - I agree that statements like these are usually wrong. I do believe there are some games where the decision of when to pull the pitcher can be crucial to the outcome. I also realize that you can never really prove whether that was the case or not. Didn't mean to hijack the subject matter of this thread.
  21. David Robertson has been a beast for you guys. Of all the moves you made around the deadline, that was the one that made me the most nervous.
  22. It was plenty close by any reasonable definition. It went to the second-last day of the season and having to use our #2 starter and our best available players to win on that day.
  23. You make me laugh with statements like these, moon, you really do. For putting Holt in the lineup as much as he did and for putting him in the 1 and 2 spots, you were calling Farrell an idiot, clown, criminally negligent and on and on. Nobody on this site spent more time trashing Farrell than you did the last few months. You were going full-on Seabeachfred. Maybe you've changed over the years. But you have been a hardcore Farrell basher and there's no way around it. You're perfectly entitled to be that, it goes without saying...but don't try to portray yourself as a Mr. Reasonable type, because you haven't been.
  24. So you're counting Betts as a DD guy. You just have your own little rules for everything, don't you, Guru?
×
×
  • Create New...