Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    54,866
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. #4, and possibly most important, it's something to jibber-jabber about between games.
  2. There's the MLBPA's concerns, and there's also MLB's concerns with the luxury tax.
  3. If my memory serves correctly, though, the Sox did recoup a million or something like that.
  4. What's getting a little buried in all this is that if Pedroia can't play any more, I wouldn't be surprised if he does try to work out something with the team where he stays on in another capacity.
  5. A-Rod's contract with the Yanks ran through 2017. In 2016 they released him. They then hired him to a new contract for 2017 as a 'special advisor'. But I don't think this had any effect on A-Rod's payroll cost for tax purposes. I think the speculation was that the release and the advisor contract were just preventative measures to keep him from trying to play for the Yanks in 2017 LOL.
  6. In 2012 the Red Sox settled with Bobby Jenks on a contract termination. I think they may have saved $1 million or something like that? But I think the reason none of us can remember a notable example of this happening is that it hasn't happened.
  7. What's the difference between that Ellsbury scenario and your Pedroia scenario?
  8. Good job going to all 3 games.
  9. Max, as fans our spirits tend to rise and fall with wins and losses.
  10. Nobody signs a consultant to a 20-30 year contract. Anything out of the ordinary would be looked at skeptically in this situation. Keep in mind that the team and Pedroia would have to agree to this sort of deal BEFORE he retires. Which is a problem.
  11. Hit Dawg Devers
  12. Copied from the end of last night's game thread: It's a funny old game, Jacks.
  13. The other Song of the Day for this game thread would be: Jimi Hendrix - If 6 Was 9
  14. When Pedroia signed the contract extension, in July 2013, he was neither clearly on the downswing nor with any obvious potential medical issues.
  15. The Red Sox have had some very good luck against Verlander over the years, beating him in games where he pitched well.
  16. If Pedey retires and the Sox hire him as a consultant or in some other capacity, how much would they pay him? That's the whole crux of the issue. If they pay him market rate for that position, there wouldn't be any issues. But if they pay him $10 million a year for 2 years, then it becomes an obvious attempt to circumvent the luxury tax.
  17. To me that makes no sense whatsoever. Dempster retired when he could still play, because of his marital issues. Pedroia is not retiring after devastating injury and difficult rehab because he wants to play. For all we know Pedroia might be willing to retire and give up the money. You're just assuming he wouldn't do that.
  18. No, he really doesn't need to do that to be seen as a team player. A lot of people would think he was an idiot (like Ryan Dempster) if he did that. And as notin says, this team has more than enough money to work with as is.
  19. Why should he give up the money, though, when he was obviously injured right on the field? This is no phantom injury or Cespedes-like idiot off-field injury.
  20. So that's the likely outcome here.
  21. Does the team have to declare him physically unable to play for him to collect his money without retiring? Any idea how that works?
  22. The question is becoming, what is the right thing for Pedey to do if in fact he just can't play any more. The right thing is not to give up the money. He deserves the money. He got injured on the battlefield.
×
×
  • Create New...